You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 18, 2024

New Telecom Services Set Out in Vietnam’s Telecom Law and Draft Decree

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s new Telecom Law 2023 was promulgated on November 24, 2023, and will take effect on July 1, 2024, for most telecom services. For three newly introduced telecom services—OTT telecom services, internet data center services, and cloud computing services—implementation and compliance will be delayed until January 1, 2025. These new services will be explored briefly below.

The Ministry of Information Communication (MIC) is currently in the process of developing a number of decrees and circulars that will detail the implementation of the Telecom Law 2023, including one main decree that guides the new law in general. This decree is scheduled for prompt promulgation to coincide with the law’s effective date of July 1, 2024.

The draft version of this decree, dated February 22, 2024 (“Draft Decree”), was shared for consultation with international organizations, associations, and enterprises by the Vietnam Telecom Agency (VNTA) in early March 2024 to gather feedback. The Draft Decree is expected to undergo further revisions before being sent to relevant state agencies for input and submission to the Ministry of Justice for assessment by the end of March 2024. The MIC anticipates submitting the subsequent version to the government by April 15, 2024.

 

New Telecom Services: OTT Telecom Services, IDC Services, and Cloud Computing Services

In comparison to the Telecom Law 2009, the Telecom Law 2023 has three new telecom services:

  • Basic telecommunications services on the internet (OTT telecom services) are defined as services whose primary functions including the sending, transmission, and receipt of information between two persons or a group of people using telecommunications services on the internet (Article 3.8 of the Telecom Law 2023). By incorporating the term “primary functions” into the definition, the Telecom Law 2023 aims to exclude services such as ride-hailing platforms where the primary function is transportation, not telecom services for sending and receiving messages between users. This intention has been clearly confirmed by the VNTA in its series of consultation meetings with industry groups during the development process of the new law.
  • Internet data center (IDC) services are services that provide functions including processing, storage, and retrieving information for users via the telecom network by partially or fully leasing a data center.
  • Cloud computing services are telecom services that provide functions including processing, storage, and retrieving information for users over the telecom network via cloud computing.

Under the Draft Decree (Article 5.3), these three new services are all classified as “value-added telecom services.”

 

Indications of Light-Touch Management Principle

Unlike traditional telecom services, these three new services will be subject to a light-touch management principle. While this was not clearly provided in the new Telecom Law 2023, which left it to future decrees to provide further guidelines, the Draft Decree reflects this intention much more clearly.

Cross-border service provision: In particular, the Draft Decree excludes these three new services from the requirement of subjecting offshore companies to sign a commercial agreement with a local licensed telecom company for service provision. Providers of these three new services only need to notify the VNTA before service provision.

Nevertheless, there are certain unclear matters that require refinement in a subsequent version of the Draft Decree. One such issue is whether offshore service providers can commence services immediately after notifying the VNTA, or if they must wait for the VNTA to issue a confirmation of notification. During its meeting for gathering feedback in early March 2024, the VNTA affirmed that offshore companies could provide services immediately upon notification, eliminating the need for any confirmation, and noted that it will consider removing the confirmation requirement from the Draft Decree.

Onshore service provision: The Draft Decree has also lifted the foreign ownership restriction applied to these three new telecom services. It requires onshore service providers of OTT telecom and cloud computing services to merely notify VNTA before providing their services. Onshore IDC service providers must register with VNTA before beginning service provision.

Similarly, there is ambiguity regarding whether IDC service providers must wait for the issuance of a confirmation of registration before providing the services, or can provide the services immediately upon registration. In response to this query, VNTA clarified that IDC service providers are required to obtain a registration certificate before commencing their services.

 

Key Obligations of Service Providers

The Draft Decree introduces a few key obligations of service providers:

  • Verify information about users’ mobile phone numbers before providing services, and store users’ information (service username and mobile phone number) and information about the service usage for the duration specified in the cybersecurity law with regard to OTT telecom service providers.
  • Store and manage user information (full name and telephone or email for individuals; organization name and address, and full name, telephone or email of contact person for organizations) with regard to IDC and cloud computing services. The industry has expressed concerns that this Draft Decree might pose a trade barrier, as current trends among OTT service providers involve minimizing the collection and storage of users’ personal information, aligning with their obligations for personal data protection. By reducing the collection and storage of personal information, not only are costs lowered, but the risk of user data leakage during system attacks is also diminished. Despite these concerns, VNTA has justified the inclusion of telephone numbers, asserting that they are essential for tracking violators in the event of violations through OTT services. Furthermore, VNTA highlighted the effective management of junk SIM cards by the MIC, reducing the risk of being unable to trace individuals based on such junk SIM cards. It is worth noting that the name provided to OTT service providers is the service username, not the actual name of the users.
  • Protect state secrets pursuant to the law on protection of state secrets: This requirement introduces compliance risks as service providers primarily serve as intermediaries without direct access to user information, which is typically encrypted. In response, VNTA has expressed an intention to review and clarify the wording, emphasizing that the obligation applies when service providers are aware of violations but fail to comply with authorities’ requests to prevent or stop such violations.
Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 4, 2026
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) could soon see some important changes, as a draft bill to amend the PDPA has been introduced in the House of Representatives. The draft amendment is currently in the public consultation phase, with comments accepted from July 16 to August 15, 2026. If enacted in its current form, the amendment would make three key changes: expanding the government exemption to cover anticorruption operations, introducing a statutory definition of “government agency,” and restructuring the lawful bases for personal data processing to align with international standards. Background The PDPA has encountered several enforcement challenges since its implementation, including three core problems identified by the bill’s sponsors: (1) the current exemptions for government agencies do not cover anticorruption and misconduct-prevention operations; (2) the PDPA lacks a clear statutory definition of “government agency,” causing legal uncertainty as to which entities are covered; and (3) the existing framework for lawful bases of data processing does not align with international standards—particularly the multiple-lawful-bases system in the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—making compliance inflexible for both government and private sector entities. Expanded Government Exemption The current PDPA exempts government agencies performing duties related to national security (including fiscal security), public safety, anti-money laundering, forensic science, and cybersecurity. The proposed amendment adds “prevention and suppression of corruption and misconduct” to this list of exempted functions. This would allow anticorruption bodies—most notably the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC), which is identified as a directly affected party—to collect, use, and disclose personal data without being subject to PDPA requirements when carrying out their duties. New Statutory Definition of “Government Agency” Notably, while the current PDPA use the term “government agency” in several provisions, the term is not comprehensively defined, creating potential uncertainty as to its scope. The draft bill therefore
Read More
August 3, 2026
On July 23, 2026, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) released for public comment its draft Notification on Digital Channel Security, which would significantly expand the scope and stringency of Thailand’s existing mobile banking security framework. If finalized in its current form, the draft notification would extend mandatory security requirements to credit card providers and credit providers, cover internet banking in addition to mobile applications, phase out SMS one-time passwords (OTPs) for transaction authentication, and introduce biometric verification requirements for high-value transactions. The public comment period is open through August 24, 2026. Background The BOT’s existing Mobile Banking Security Notification, issued in 2024, sets minimum security standards for financial institutions, specialized financial institutions (SFIs), and e-money providers, significantly reducing “money-draining app” fraud. However, fraudsters have since shifted to nonbank providers and internet banking channels, prompting the BOT to propose broader security requirements. Expanded Scope of Regulated Entities and Channels The existing Mobile Banking Security Notification covers only financial institutions, SFIs, and e-money providers offering mobile banking services. The draft expands coverage in two key areas: entities and channels. On the entity side, it adds credit card providers and credit providers that offer fund transfers to third parties at other financial service providers or that provide cash withdrawal services to individual retail customers. On the channel side, it broadens coverage to include internet banking in addition to mobile banking. Strengthened Customer Authentication The draft introduces enhanced authentication requirements in three areas: Service enrollment and device changes. Providers must implement rigorous identity verification, notify customers of enrollment results through out-of-band communication channels, and adopt risk-mitigation measures such as cooling-off periods and temporary transaction limits. Transaction-level authentication. Providers must use two-factor authentication for fund transfers, cardless ATM withdrawals, and transaction limit increases. Secure authentication factors. Key requirements include the following: “What-you-know” factors must
Read More
July 28, 2026
Data protection officers (DPOs) have become a fixture of Thailand’s privacy compliance landscape since the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) took full effect and the Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) began requiring certain organizations to appoint them. On July 7, 2026, the Office of the PDPC presented draft guidance on DPOs as part of a public consultation on a series of draft personal data protection manuals and recommendations. The draft offers the clearest indication yet of how the regulator expects the DPO role to work in practice, addressing recurring implementation issues under the PDPA—including when an organization must appoint a DPO, how the DPO should operate independently, how to manage conflicts of interest, and how data subjects and regulators should be able to contact the DPO. Because it remains in draft, organizations have an opportunity to weigh the practical implications now before the guidance is finalized. When a DPO Must Be Appointed The draft guidance clarifies the triggers for mandatory DPO appointment, including: Regular and systematic monitoring of personal data or systems on a large scale, such as tracking, analyzing, or predicting behavior, attitudes, or individual characteristics. Core activities involving large-scale processing of sensitive personal data, such as health data, biometric data, or criminal records. Certain foreign-organization representative arrangements. Public-sector coverage under relevant notifications identifying government entities that must appoint a DPO. Processing involving 100,000 or more data subjects may be considered large-scale. The guidance also contemplates voluntary DPO appointment for organizations that wish to raise their privacy governance standards, and such organizations should still comply with the standards applicable to DPOs under the law. Independence and Reporting Lines The draft guidance identifies lack of DPO independence as a core risk because an ineffective or constrained DPO may be unable to raise deficiencies
Read More
July 27, 2026
Vietnam’s new E-Commerce Law, which took effect on 1 July 2026 along with its implementing Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP (Decree 248), marks a significant development in the country’s approach to online intellectual property (IP) enforcement, reflecting a clear shift from a reactive model of intermediary liability to one that expects platforms to play a more active role in preventing infringement. From notice-and-takedown to platform responsibility The most significant change introduced by the E-Commerce Law is the transformation of the legal role of e-commerce platforms. The existing safe harbor provisions under the IP Law and the copyright notice-and-takedown regime established by Decree 17/2023/ND-CP (Decree 17) largely required intermediaries to act only after receiving notice of infringement. Once infringing content had been removed, the platform’s legal obligation was generally considered fulfilled. The new legislation adopts a fundamentally different approach. Article 17 of the E-Commerce Law requires intermediary platforms to screen information relating to goods and services before publication in order to prevent listings involving counterfeit or IP-infringing goods, and goods of unknown origin. Rather than relying exclusively on complaints from rights holders, platforms are now expected to implement preventive measures before infringing listings become publicly available. Decree 248 further requires platforms to update keyword filters based on recommendations issued by competent authorities. These filtering mechanisms are intended to prevent prohibited listings from appearing on the platform and represent a further move away from a purely complaint-driven enforcement model. The legislation also introduces Vietnam’s first statutory stay-down obligation. Under the E-Commerce Law and Decree 248, major digital platforms must maintain automated systems capable of reviewing, warning against, and removing unlawful listings while also implementing measures to prevent repeat violations, defined under Decree 248 as conduct that has previously been identified and handled by the platform, but continues to recur. This obligation addresses one
Read More