China Tightens Food Safety Standards with Sweeping New Regulations on Food Importation

February 5, 2020

China Tightens Food Safety Standards with Sweeping New Regulations on Food Importation

Southeast Asian food exporters to China should be aware of new regulations announced in late November 2019 by China’s General Administration of Customs (GAC) for all food products. The first is still in draft form and seeks to expand the scope of the GAC’s role in policing all food products, while the second update—already implemented–makes the application process for an import license for animal and plant food products much more rigorous. These two updates deal primarily with the GAC; applicants for an import license must also comply with the regulations of the Chinese Food and Drug Administration.

Draft Update

The GAC issued its Revised Draft Management Rules for the Registration of Overseas Production Enterprises of Imported Food on November 26, 2019, and accepted public comment until December 25, 2019. The draft proposes to expand the scope of registration—from the current requirement of having only overseas manufacturers of meat products, aquatic products, and dairy products register with the GAC—to extend to overseas manufacturers of all food categories who export their products to China. For example, under the draft, manufacturers will need to register with the GAC in categories such as health foods, foods for special medical purposes, infant foods, wines, prepackaged foods like beverages, candy, chocolates, and so on. This means that overseas manufacturers who were previously able to export their food products to China without registering for approval from the GAC will have to register their food products if the draft rules are implemented.

The draft imposes a new risk-based system for registration. Imported foods with higher levels of food safety risks—for example, meat, aquatic, dairy, and edible bird’s nest products—will merit greater scrutiny. Registration for low-risk food categories will be more straightforward and have simpler requirements. The draft also imposes increased responsibility on the exporting country’s local regulatory authority with regard to the supervision and management of manufacturers before, during, and after registration. If the local authority is deficient in its duties, the GAC may reject the manufacturer’s registration. The draft also puts more responsibility on the Chinese importer, which is required to check that the overseas food manufacturer has been properly registered with a confirmed name, address, and registration code.

New Regulations in Effect

Also on November 29, 2019, the GAC released new regulations that add additional scrutiny for foreign applicants looking to secure an import license for plant and animal food products. Applicants now need to undergo an initial documentation review before an application is accepted. Once the application is accepted, the GAC will then form two expert panels to examine the safety, hygiene conditions, and quality control system at the point of manufacture, as well as compliance aspects such as formal business registration and management systems in the applicant’s country of origin. The regulations also require compliance with Chinese regulations and standards, as well as adherence to labor standards equivalent to those imposed on companies registered in China. Current license holders will be able to export and distribute their items until their current license expires. After expiration, they will be subject to the new application procedures.

These new requirements coincide with new certification regulations for organic products, in effect from January 1, 2020. Under these changes, applications for organic certification will only be granted for products found in the “Organic Product Certification Catalogue.” Companies that have received prior certification for products not included in the list can continue using the granted certificate until expiration. However, after expiration, organic products not listed in the new catalogue will no longer be deemed organic-certified.

These new regulations signal a push for the GAC to play a more active role in importing food products from overseas manufacturers. It is recommended that all food exporters to China review their current practices and make sure they are aligned with the GAC’s new regulations currently enforced and those that will be enforced in the near future.

Related Professionals

Kris Leevongcharoen

Email

RELATED INSIGHTS

July 27, 2026

Vietnam’s E-Commerce Law Reshapes Online IP Enforcement

Vietnam’s new E-Commerce Law, which took effect on 1 July 2026 along with its implementing Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP (Decree 248), marks a significant development in the country’s approach to online intellectual property (IP) enforcement, reflecting a clear shift from a reactive model of intermediary liability to one that expects platforms to play a more active role in preventing infringement. From notice-and-takedown to platform responsibility The most significant change introduced by the E-Commerce Law is the transformation of the legal role of e-commerce platforms. The existing safe harbor provisions under the IP Law and the copyright notice-and-takedown regime established by Decree 17/2023/ND-CP (Decree 17) largely required intermediaries to act only after receiving notice of infringement. Once infringing content had been removed, the platform’s legal obligation was generally considered fulfilled. The new legislation adopts a fundamentally different approach. Article 17 of the E-Commerce Law requires intermediary platforms to screen information relating to goods and services before publication in order to prevent listings involving counterfeit or IP-infringing goods, and goods of unknown origin. Rather than relying exclusively on complaints from rights holders, platforms are now expected to implement preventive measures before infringing listings become publicly available. Decree 248 further requires platforms to update keyword filters based on recommendations issued by competent authorities. These filtering mechanisms are intended to prevent prohibited listings from appearing on the platform and represent a further move away from a purely complaint-driven enforcement model. The legislation also introduces Vietnam’s first statutory stay-down obligation. Under the E-Commerce Law and Decree 248, major digital platforms must maintain automated systems capable of reviewing, warning against, and removing unlawful listings while also implementing measures to prevent repeat violations, defined under Decree 248 as conduct that has previously been identified and handled by the platform, but continues to recur. This obligation addresses one

July 24, 2026

Thailand’s New Public Novel Food List and Exclusivity Period Survey

As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.

July 24, 2026

Thailand’s Licensing Facilitation Act 2026: A Step Forward for Regulated Industries

For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses

July 13, 2026

Indonesia Tightens Halal Compliance Enforcement with New Administrative Sanctions

Indonesia’s Halal Product Assurance Agency (BPJPH) has issued new regulations establishing clearer procedures for imposing administrative sanctions on businesses that violate halal product assurance requirements. BPJPH Regulation No. 2 of 2026 on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions for Violations of Halal Product Assurance Implementation, issued on June 5, 2026, strengthens Indonesia’s halal compliance framework, as mandated under Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Assurance and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 on the Implementation of Halal Product Assurance. BPJPH Regulation No. 2/2026 also supports the upcoming mandatory halal compliance deadline of October 17, 2026, which will apply to a broad range of products and services, including imported food and beverages, slaughtering products and services, natural and quasi-drugs, health supplements, cosmetics, chemical and genetically engineered products, clothing and accessories, household goods, prayer equipment, stationery, and class A medical devices. Scope BPJPH is authorized to impose administrative sanctions for violations of halal product assurance requirements committed by businesses, halal inspection agencies (LPH), halal auditors, halal product process companion institutions (lembaga pendamping PPH), and halal product process companions (pendamping PPH). The head of BPJPH has authority to determine, cancel, or amend the imposition of administrative sanctions, including upon receipt of objections. This authority covers revocation of Halal Certificates (including foreign halal certificate registration numbers), withdrawal of goods from circulation, freezing of LPH operations, freezing of halal product process companion institutions, revocation of PPH companion institution registration numbers, revocation of halal auditor registration numbers, and revocation of LPH accreditation status. Administrative Sanctions Businesses may be subject to any of the following administrative sanctions: Written warning; Administrative fine; Revocation of the halal certificate, including revocation of foreign halal certificate registration numbers; and Withdrawal of goods from circulation. The regulation sets out the types of violations that may trigger these sanctions, with each

Industries

Practices

February 5, 2020