You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 3, 2019

Allowing Foreign Investment in the Yangon Stock Exchange Is Good News for Myanmar

Informed Counsel

On July 12, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Myanmar issued Notification 1/2019, which announced that foreign individuals and foreign entities will be permitted to invest in up to 35% of the shares in Myanmar companies listed on the Yangon Stock Exchange (YSX). This limitation aligns with the classification of any company with greater than 35% foreign shareholding as a “foreign” company under the Myanmar Companies Law (2017)—a classification which introduces many complications, not least of which is a restriction against owning land under the Transfer of Immoveable Property (Restriction) Act (1987). For a listed company, designation as a foreign company could therefore be ruinous, and although the YSX’s 35% foreign investment cap may seem a heavy fetter at first glance, in that context it is very reasonable.

In fact, the entire program of foreign investment, although not materialized in full at the time of writing, so far seems to be very progressive and reasonable. For example, trading on the YSX will be open to all foreigners, not restricted to Myanmar residents, and unlike the somewhat slow pace of reforms often seen in developing countries, foreign trading on the YSX is expected to begin in the near future—perhaps even sometime before the end of 2019 according to our sources. We understand that the YSX has even invested in the necessary software systems to allow for calculation of the 35% threshold, and had already implemented them ready for trading to begin. To the uninitiated, this may seem entirely at odds with the usual pace of reforms in developing countries. To regular Myanmar watchers, however, this kind of rapid and progressive change to the commercial landscape is becoming a regular feature.

This is, to some degree, because Myanmar’s determination to foster rapid economic growth is rooted in a strong understanding of the precedents set elsewhere. Research has shown that stock exchange development is extremely important for economic development. According to a report by the World Federation of Exchanges and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development entitled The Role of Stock Exchanges in Fostering Economic Growth and Sustainable Development, “[w]ell-functioning exchanges enable economic growth and development by facilitating the mobilisation of financial resources—by bringing together those who need capital to innovate and grow, with those who have resources to invest. They do this within an environment that is regulated, secure, transparent and equitable. Exchanges also seek to promote good corporate governance amongst their listed issuers, encouraging transparency, accountability and respect for the rights of shareholders and key stakeholders.”

Furthermore, the theoretical and academic literature predominantly finds positive links between well-functioning exchanges and economic development. In a study looking at the performance of firms (used here in the economic sense to mean “business organizations”), Demigüç-Kunt and Vojislav (1996) found that firms in countries with “active” stock markets experience higher-than-predicted growth rates. Another study by Beck and Levine (2002), looking at data from 40 countries over four five-year periods, found not only that financial market development is important for economic growth but that both banks and stock markets independently and concurrently have a role to play. Caporale et al (2004) looked explicitly at the question of causality and concluded that well-developed stock markets can foster economic growth (see here).

Although some may be skeptical of the prospects for the YSX, in the medium to longer term we have more confidence. Our sources tell us that a number of foreign institutions have already expressed interest in investing in the YSX, with funds already allocated for investment in Myanmar. Furthermore, although there are only five companies currently listed on the YSX, we understand that there are at least two further companies already in the listing pipeline. With foreign investment coming to the YSX, interest by domestic companies in listing is only likely to increase. Those wishing to familiarize themselves with the procedure required for listing on the YSX might be interested in referring back to a previous article by this author written for Frontier Myanmar (see here).    

It would also be wrong to see the liberalization of investment in the YSX in isolation. Over the past several years, Myanmar has liberalized the telecommunications, banking, insurance, and wholesale/retail trading sectors, which collectively mark a huge stride forward for what was long regarded as an isolated and impenetrable economy, not to mention the reforms to the Myanmar Investment Law, the new Companies Law, and the new electronic company registration system in Myanmar. This pattern of economic liberalization shows no sign of slowing—for example, foreign banks are expected to be permitted to provide retail banking services in the very near future, and other highly regulated industries will likely follow suit. The liberalization of the YSX is just part of this pattern.    

With this latest announcement, it would seem that this  is now the “end of the beginning” of the YSX. We are moving forward into a new era.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 4, 2026
Carbon markets have moved to the forefront of corporate and regulatory agendas as global attention to climate change and sustainability intensifies. Worldwide, many jurisdictions—including Thailand—are finding carbon markets to be promising tools in their efforts to combat climate-warming emissions and accelerate their net-zero pathways and sustainability commitments. According to the Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization’s (TGO) 2025 Voluntary Carbon Market Survey, approximately 3.29 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂eq) were traded under Thailand’s domestic standard between 2020 and 2024 with a cumulative market value of approximately THB 314.5 million (approximately USD 9.43 million), and 524 projects had been registered under the Thailand Voluntary Emission Reduction Program (T-VER) framework. Carbon Credits in Thailand Thailand’s carbon credit regime is, at present, entirely voluntary. There is not yet any obligation for businesses to purchase or retire carbon credits, although this may change once the draft Climate Change Act is enacted. The draft Climate Change Act, which is currently undergoing legal review before submission to Parliament, is expected to introduce a mandatory emissions trading system (ETS), under which  legal entities in designated sectors will be allocated emissions allowances and will be required to surrender sufficient allowances to cover their verified emissions, with penalties for shortfalls. Rather than imposing a blanket obligation on all businesses to purchase or retire carbon credits, the draft act is expected to allow ETS-covered entities to use eligible carbon credits (for example, those certified under T-VER) to meet only a limited, capped portion of their compliance obligation, with the applicable cap and eligibility criteria to be set out in subordinate regulations and the relevant allocation plan. The principal domestic framework for carbon credits is the T-VER, administered by the TGO. While some project developers in Thailand also operate under international standards such as Verified Carbon Standard or the Gold
July 8, 2026
The Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) has issued new oversight and disclosure rules, effective July 1, 2026, overhauling the previous requirements. The reforms apply to listed companies, REITs, and property and infrastructure funds, and aim to enhance transparency, align with international standards, and ensure timely investor information. The key changes and practical implications are highlighted below. Major Shareholder Reporting When a shareholding change reaching or crossing 5% or any subsequent multiple of 5% is reported under section 246 of the Securities and Exchange Act or a tender offer is completed (except for voluntary delisting), listed companies must disclose an updated shareholder list for the month in which the triggering event occurred. The list must be compiled within five business days after month-end and disclosed within 14 days thereafter. Noncompliance will trigger a “notice pending” (NP) sign. This replaces the previous requirement to disclose shareholder lists only at annual general meetings or on record dates. Companies should coordinate with their share registrars to meet the new event-driven timelines. New Financial and Internal Control Disclosures The new rules require disclosure of material impairment, expected credit losses, and unreturned business deposits when these reach specified thresholds. Companies must also disclose events or indicators that may materially affect their internal control systems. Boards and audit committees should expect to escalate accounting and internal-control issues earlier, as these matters may now trigger standalone SET disclosure obligations—not just financial statement treatment. Backdoor Listing With the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulation on material transactions (MTs) taking effect on July 1, 2026, and now serving as the primary, standalone framework governing acquisitions and disposals, the SET needed to issue a standalone rule on backdoor listing matters. These matters had been covered by a previous regulation on MTs issued by the SET. The key differences between the SET’s
June 29, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seeking public input on significant amendments to the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) that would address recurring market abuses and eroded investor confidence observed by the SEC. Published on June 24, 2026, the consultation document targets share-pledging disclosure failures, hidden beneficial ownership, and fraudulent transactions by listed companies, all of which are issues that have threatened share prices and market stability across the Thai capital markets. Comments on the proposals are due by July 24, 2026. Mandatory Disclosure of Short Sales and Share Pledges The draft amendments introduce new reporting obligations for both short sales and share pledges. Persons who sell listed securities without having such securities in their possession (“short sales”) must comply with rules prescribed by the Capital Market Supervisory Board, ensuring standardized practices and preventing risks from such transactions. Major shareholders who pledge or encumber their shares in significant amounts must report those arrangements to the SEC, which may then disclose the information to the public. These amendments directly respond to recent market abuses, including short selling without proper safeguards and instances where directors or major shareholders have pledged large share blocks without disclosure to investors, only to have those shares forcibly sold when collateral was called, causing dramatic share price declines and disrupting ownership structures and market stability. Reportable transactions for share pledges include the following: Shares used as margin account collateral Shares pledged as loan security, with immediate transfer upon default Shares formally pledged under the Civil and Commercial Code or registered with the Thailand Securities Depository Failure to report share pledges triggers criminal penalties, as does failure to comply with short sale requirements. By requiring advance disclosure and standardized short sale procedures, the SEC aims to enable investors to assess ownership stability and default
June 18, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released a detailed draft notification expanding its oversight to cover the funding sources behind major shareholdings in licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Published on June 8, 2026, as Public Hearing Document No. 30/2569, the draft builds on funding-source principles introduced in an April hearing and on recently amended Ministry of Finance notifications issued in February 2026 that broadened the definition of major shareholder of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. A public comment period on the draft closes on June 23, 2026. An earlier version of the SEC’s proposal brought the issue of funding behind significant shareholdings within the SEC’s regulatory perimeter, signaling intent to look beyond shareholding to the persons and capital ultimately financing major shareholdings in licensed securities and digital asset business operators. The concern is that control may be exercised through financing arrangements rather than through equity ownership alone. The draft notification advances that initiative into a more detailed regulatory framework, as summarized below. Expanded Definition Captures Funding Sources Throughout Ownership Chains The draft regulation introduces a “material funding source” concept. A material funding source is the principal capital that enables a major shareholder to acquire its shareholding, without which the shareholding could not be obtained. Under the proposed rules, any person who provides such funding, whether directly to the major shareholder or indirectly through any tier of the ownership chain above the operator, is deemed a controller subject to SEC approval. The draft also captures any person acting as a conduit or intermediary in facilitating financial assistance to a major shareholder, deeming each of these persons to be a material funding source and aggregating it into the same control group as the ultimate funding source. The definition covers not only cash loans and equity investments,