You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 29, 2017

Spam and the Computer Crimes Act 2017: What Do Businesses Need to Know?

Informed Counsel

As the government seeks to elevate Thailand to the status of a high-income nation, the formation of a digital platform through the “Thailand 4.0” project is seen as an essential element of economic transformation, with the focus now fixed firmly on enhancing research and development, science and technology, and creative thinking and innovation.

To facilitate this economic change, the government and the National Legislative Assembly have made a number of changes to the law, including updates to the Computer Crimes Act (CCA) which were enacted earlier this year. The Ministry of Digital Economy and Society is responsible for issuing subordinate regulations under the CCA.

Spam e-Message Offense

Section 11 of the old CCA previously prohibited sending to another person any email or computer data that concealed or forged its source in a manner that disturbed the normal use of another’s computer system. However, it did not apply to disturbing or bothering the recipient themselves. The new version has been amended in direct response to developments in tech-related activities, and now makes it an offense to send an email, or computer data, in a manner that disturbs the recipient and that does not allow the recipient to opt out or unsubscribe.

In addition, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society has issued a notification under the new section 11 that sets out the characteristics and methods of sending emails and data, and characteristics of computer data or e-mails, which are not considered to cause a disturbance to the recipient. This notification acts as a set of “Safe Harbor Rules” for business operators when sending e-messages to their customers, prospective customers, or even to business partners or third parties.

The notification defines a “sender” as any person who intends to send company data or emails primarily for commercial purposes, and any website, application, and social media operators that advertise or support the sending of such data or emails. However, it does not include telecommunications business operators that act as intermediaries for transmitting such data or emails.

Safe Harbor Rules

The following types of e-messages are assumed not to cause a disturbance to the recipient.

  1. An e-message sent to another person as evidence of an agreed contractual transaction, or for compliance with law, or for expressing a relationship or a legal relationship between each other.
  2. An e-message sent by a government body that enforces the law, for the purpose of providing communications that are not for commercial purposes.
  3. An e-message sent by an educational institution, a charitable body, or other organizations, which is not for commercial purposes.
  4. An e-message sent in a legal manner which does not violate any individual rights and which is not for commercial purposes.

The notification states that e-messages for commercial purposes (and not within the scope of 1– 4 above) are only permissible when consent has been obtained from the recipient, and the following conditions are met:

  • E-messages must specify the signs, details, and processes that will enable the recipient to opt out of or unsubscribe from receiving such e-messages, including technical measures allowing the recipient to do so quickly.
  • After a request to unsubscribe has been made, the sender must suspend the sending of e-messages to the recipient immediately or, in certain circumstances, within seven days from the receipt of the request.
  • It is strictly prohibited for the process or request form for opting out/unsubscribing to be conditional or to divert for any additional commercial purposes (for example, if clicking the opt-out request routes the user to other websites or other sales distribution channels).
  • If the sender continues to send e-messages to the recipient after a request has been made, the recipient may send another request, in writing, by way of an email, registered mail with return receipt, or any other way by which they can confirm receipt. If the sender continues to send e-messages after receiving a request of this nature, the sender is deemed to be committing the spam offense under section 11 of the CCA.

Practical Issues

It remains to be seen how the requirements can be complied with in practice. For example, some businesses have asked how they should get consent from the recipient and whether implied consent could be acceptable.

Since this spam e-message offense could attract a maximum fine of THB 200,000 per spam communication, companies that engage in online business activities need to proceed with caution in their electronic marketing and adhere to the safe harbor rules in order to avoid exposure to potential regulatory penalties.

Though the notification provides further guidance and clarification on the spam e-message offense and what business operators should do to avoid committing it, there will still be a number of practical issues on compliance, going forward, that will require further interpretation. The notification grants the Permanent Secretary of the Minister of Digital Economy and Society the power to interpret and consider any issues resulting from any actions that arise from the notification, and companies would be well advised to be alert for any such interpretations in the near future.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
Thailand has established a new cross-ministerial committee to oversee data center operations nationwide. On August 5, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s Office Regulation on the Data Center Business Policy Committee, which was published in the Government Gazette on August 13, 2026, and is now in effect. The regulation reflects the government’s policy to elevate Thailand’s digital economy and promote investment in digital infrastructure and AI. The key features of the new committee are outlined below. Definition of “Data Center” Under the regulation, “data center” is defined as a building, premises, or structure that uses electronic equipment to provide services related to the collection, storage, processing, hosting, or transmission of data by electronic means to third parties that are not affiliates, as further determined by the Data Center Business Policy Committee. Committee Composition The committee will be chaired by a deputy prime minister designated by the prime minister, and will have three vice-chairs comprising the ministers of digital economy and society, interior, and energy. The committee also includes 12 ex-officio members: the permanent secretaries of finance, agriculture, natural resources, energy, interior, digital economy, industry, and commerce; the secretaries-general of the Board of Investment (BOI), Energy Regulatory Commission, National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), and National Water Resources Office; and the director of the Energy Policy and Planning Office. Up to three expert members may be appointed by the prime minister for two-year terms, renewable once. The secretary-general of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC) serves as member and secretary, with up to two NESDC officials serving as assistant secretaries. Powers and Duties The committee is empowered to: Propose policies, standards, and operational frameworks for government agencies in approving, licensing, issuing investment promotion certificates, or providing services to data center operators in Thailand; Study, analyze, and
August 14, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has issued guidelines clarifying the boundaries between permissible and prohibited activities for unlicensed individuals—including influencers, bloggers, and content creators—when communicating about insurance products on social media. The Good Practice Guidelines for Persons Not Licensed as Insurance Agents or Brokers Regarding the Dissemination of Insurance Content Through Digital Media B.E. 2569 (2026) took effect on July 24, 2026. Activities Requiring a License The guidelines reserve the following activities for licensed agents and brokers: Soliciting or facilitating insurance contracts. Providing personalized advice on product suitability. Recommending policy cancellation to purchase promoted products. Creating links that facilitate contract formation. Receiving performance-based compensation tied to policies or premiums generated. Importantly, boilerplate disclaimers such as “this is not a recommendation to buy insurance” will not shield individuals from liability if the OIC views the content as personalized advice or solicitation. Permitted Activities Unlicensed persons may present general educational content about insurance—such as explaining terminology, sharing industry statistics, reporting news, or sharing personal experiences—provided the content does not target specific individuals to purchase from specific companies. The guidelines also set out best practices for communication, including presenting information in a fair and balanced manner that covers both benefits and limitations, encouraging consumers to read policy terms and consult licensed professionals, verifying information from credible sources before dissemination, and exercising special care when the audience may include vulnerable groups such as persons aged 60 and older. Prohibited Practices Prohibited practices include fear-based marketing, creating artificial urgency, omitting material limitations, making exaggerated claims, falsely claiming professional credentials, using fake engagement mechanisms, and sharing false or misleading content. The guidelines also reinforce the prohibitions under section 83 of the Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 and section 78 of the Non-Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 against soliciting insurance contracts with foreign operators
August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for