You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 28, 2017

Seven Things to Look for in Your Private Power Purchase Agreement

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

As the costs of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels decrease, new business opportunities are emerging. In addition to the traditional model of independent power producers establishing large-scale power generating facilities to sell electricity directly to public utilities, a new dynamic model of direct electricity selling is beginning to take shape.

Solar PV panels can be installed on roofs to supply electricity directly to the building’s occupants, bypassing the need for a local electricity utility. Under a contract between private parties, the customer and power producer are able to negotiate directly on the cost of the electricity to be supplied. The resulting increase in competition has the potential to reduce energy costs across the market.

Typically, the electricity seller will remain the owner of the PV panels, the inverter, and other components of the generating system. As the seller will be financing the installation of the system, this will allow the purchaser to sign up with minimal initial costs.

The principal contractual document governing the relationship between the seller and purchaser is the power purchase agreement (PPA). PPAs are traditionally executed between independent power producers and the local electricity utility, which in Thailand has been the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA), the Metropolitan Electricity Authority (MEA), or the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT).

The form PPAs from the MEA, PEA, and EGAT generally do not allow for much negotiation on the part of the independent power producers. But with rooftop solar installations, both the seller and the purchaser of the electricity being generated are private parties, meaning there is greater room for flexibility.

Here are seven issues that both parties should be aware of from the outset:

1. Ownership of the facilities: Ideally, the purchaser will be the owner of both the building and the land. However, if the purchaser is leasing the property, it is important to ensure that installation of the system will not violate the lease agreement, or will not result in the system becoming attached to the building as a permanent fixture. If the building and/or land are being leased, the term of the lease should also be confirmed in order to ensure that installation of the system will be economical for the seller.

2. Minimum purchase requirements: The purchaser should ideally be required to purchase a minimum amount of electricity each month, failing which, it will still be required to compensate the seller. This “take or pay” model is optimal for ensuring financial predictability on the part of the seller and its financiers. The purchaser should take care to ensure that its minimum commitments are not excessive and can easily be managed in light of anticipated future use.

3. Clear lines between Force Majeure and Events of Default: A key issue to consider in the PPA is how to address changes to the environment which are beyond the control of the purchaser. If the purchaser’s neighbor to the south erects a tall building, trees, or other obstructions, the solar PV system may be rendered effectively worthless. It will be important to ensure that the PPA clearly outlines whether the purchaser is entitled to terminate the agreement in such circumstances.

4. Ownership of the system: Since the seller will retain ownership of the system, it will want to affix conspicuous markings on all equipment to ensure that its ownership interests are clear. The PPA should contain a clause which requires the purchaser to assist the seller in the event the seller wishes to register its ownership interests at any relevant government agencies. Furthermore, the PPA should contain covenants on the part of the purchaser that it will take no actions which will result in the system being deemed a fixture.

5. Mortgages and encumbrances: The seller must be aware if the land and/or building on which the panels will be placed has been mortgaged. Additionally, the PPA may contain a negative covenant on the part of the purchaser not to mortgage the building, or an undertaking to notify the seller in the event it mortgages the building. The seller’s lenders may consider securing their loans to the seller by taking the solar PV system as collateral.

6. Regulatory environment: As this is a new area of business, the regulatory framework is still in the process of being devised. The purchaser and seller must stay apprised of new rules and regulations promulgated by the Energy Regulatory Commission, and the PPA must envision how new rules affecting the transaction will be addressed.

7. Payment terms: Delayed payment by the purchaser should ideally result in automatic interest payments being levied. It will not be in the seller’s best interests to terminate the agreement immediately in the event of non-payment; however, the purchaser must have a clear disincentive to delay on making its regular payments.

Private PPAs for solar PV systems are still in their infancy in Thailand, and best practices will continue to develop. It is important that both purchasers and sellers of electricity are aware of the legal risks involved when negotiating PPAs and have taken all appropriate steps to maximize their bargaining position.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 25, 2026
After several years of policy discussion and continued efforts led by the Ministry of Commerce (MOC) to relax the list of reserved businesses under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), the reform process has now reached a significant milestone. On May 12, 2026, the Thai cabinet approved in principle two draft subordinate legislative instruments aimed at delisting certain reserved business activities under the FBA and reducing licensing requirements for foreign business operators. These developments signal a renewed and concrete effort by the government to modernize Thailand’s business regulatory framework in order to attract foreign investment and boost Thailand’s competitiveness in the global market. Nine Businesses Set for FBA Delisting Below is a list of the nine businesses that are being targeted for delisting from the FBA’s restrictions. A draft ministerial regulation would delist the first eight reserved businesses, while a royal decree has been drafted to delist the ninth business: Telecommunications services (Type 1 license only, covering operators without their own telecommunications infrastructure), under the supervision of the Office of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission. Treasury center services subject to the Foreign Exchange Control Act B.E. 2485 and under the supervision of the Bank of Thailand. Securities-collateralized lending, pursuant to the laws governing securities and exchange and derivatives regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Agency, dealer, advisory, or fund management services relating to derivatives where the underlying assets fall outside the scope of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) Intra-group shared services, including administrative, human resources, and IT functions Intra-group domestic debt guarantee services Leasing of partial space for installation of financial service machines and automatic vending machines for employee use Petroleum drilling services Trading of agricultural product derivatives through a futures exchange, with physical delivery or receipt of agricultural products at a futures exchange–designated
February 10, 2026
Data center and cloud investments are forming a major focus of private-sector investment in Thailand, with tech giants like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and TikTok, as well as numerous telecom and data center companies, committing significant outlays to data center and cloud development. The country’s Board of Investment (BOI) approved projects worth THB 1.87 trillion in 2025, and THB 746 billion of this was from planned data center investments—by far the largest amount from any single industry. Thailand’s swift rise as a regional data center hub is fueled by surging demand for cloud, AI, and digital services, as well as large-scale investments from global tech firms. The country’s strategic location, competitive power costs, robust fiber infrastructure, expanding IT talent, and supportive government policies—including BOI incentives and streamlined approvals—have made it an attractive destination for scalable and sustainable digital infrastructure investments. The BOI’s proactive approach in updating promoted categories and providing both tax and non-tax incentives further ensures Thailand’s continued growth in this sector. 2025 BOI Changes for Data Centers In the middle of 2025, the BOI responded to the remarkable trend by updating investment‑promotion categories across various sectors (e.g., machinery and electrical equipment, public utilities, digital and innovative industries) to accommodate growing investment in data‑center projects. Before the change, which was detailed in a notification that has applied to investment promotion applications submitted from July 1, 2025, onward, data‑center projects under BOI promotion were granted a single A1 incentive (an eight‑year corporate income‑tax exemption) and subject to one uniform set of conditions. The July 2025 notification restructured promotion for data centers into two categories based on power‑usage efficiency: high‑efficiency data centers and other data centers. Under these rules, qualified high‑efficiency data centers are eligible for an eight‑year corporate income tax (CIT) exemption, while for other data centers this exemption is
November 21, 2025
On November 17, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Interior introduced significant regulatory changes to make rooftop solar adoption easier and more cost-effective for property owners. Ministerial Regulation No. 72 B.E. 2568 (2025), issued under the Building Control Act B.E. 2522 (1979), was published in the Government Gazette on November 19, 2025, with immediate effect. Background Under the Building Control Act (BCA), any alteration made to a building requires either notification of the relevant authority or application for a building alteration permit—unless the alteration falls under a separate list of exceptions specified in the ministerial regulations issued under the BCA. In 2015, installation of solar rooftops on any residential building under 160 square meters was added to this list of exceptions, subject to inspection and notification requirements. The newly enacted regulation now eliminates many of these requirements and introduces a broader and more permissive framework to promote solar adoption nationwide. Key Changes Specifically, the regulation introduces three major changes: Expanded exemption from the definition of “building alteration”: The installation of solar panels on any building roof—regardless of the type of building or the total area of the installation—is no longer considered a building alteration under the BCA, provided that the total weight of the installation does not exceed 20 kg/m2. Removal of structural integrity certification requirement: The new regulation eliminates the obligation to obtain a structural stability certificate from a licensed civil engineer. Removal of notification requirement: Property owners or possessors are no longer required to notify the local authority before installation of a solar rooftop. Impact This significant streamlining of requirements for solar rooftop installation is expected to accelerate the adoption of renewable energy in the country, particularly for residential and commercial properties—similar to the way Thailand’s December 2024 removal of licensing requirements for factory solar rooftop installations encouraged such
September 25, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins’ labor and employment team in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City has contributed the Vietnam chapter to Labor and Employment Disputes 2026. Drawing on the expertise of three of the firm’s employment specialists, the chapter provides practical guidance for navigating employment disputes in Vietnam and covers: Pre-action considerations: key requirements, third-party funding, contingency fee arrangements Issuing a claim: forum, territorial jurisdiction, standing, commencing claims, fees, service, defendants and legal personality, types of claims, time limits, counterclaims Case management: procedure, rules, amendments to claims, adding parties, consolidating proceedings, class and collective actions, evidence, witnesses, tactical considerations Interim relief: availability, requirements Trial: hearings conduct and time frames, confidentiality and public access, media reporting, elements of successful claims and burden of proof Alternative dispute resolution: available types, requirements and expectations, enforcement Collective employment and labor rights: enforcement and standing Remedies and enforcement: available remedies, assessing compensation, enforcement mechanisms Appeals: procedure, time frames, other means of challenge Updates and trends: recent cases and developments, technology developments, other issues The Vietnam chapter is available for download below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia and Thailand chapters to Labor and Employment Disputes 2026. Readers can also gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Labor and Employment Disputes 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.