You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 17, 2014

Understanding the Asean Collective Investment Scheme

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

In the latest step towards the integration of Asean capital markets, Thailand-based fund managers can now offer retail funds directly to investors in Malaysia and Singapore —and vice versa — through a streamlined process. This change follows the launch on Aug 25 of the Asean Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) Framework by Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission, Malaysia’s Securities Commission and the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

Initially, the Asean CIS will offer retail investors in all three countries a wide range of innovative cross-border funds. In the future, more Asean members will take part. Fund managers will also benefit in that they will have a direct and efficient route through which to offer their funds to retail investors throughout the region.

Fund managers using the framework must abide by a set of common standards designed to ensure they have the necessary experience and track record. A handbook provides guidance to fund managers on the operational aspects.

Qualifying as an Asean CIS is a two-step process — an application must be made to the regulator in the fund’s home jurisdiction, followed by an application to the host jurisdiction where the fund manager intends to offer the CIS.

In assessing whether a CIS is suitable to be an Asean CIS, the home regulator will consider among other things the following:

  • the qualifications of the CIS operator and the trustee/fund supervisor;
  • the custody arrangements for the CIS assets; and
  • compliance with certain product restrictions specified in the Standards of Qualifying CIS.

The CIS operator, for example, must be licensed or registered by its home regulator and maintain shareholders’ equity of at least US$1 million. In addition, the chief executive must have at least 10 years’ experience in financial and capital markets, and all board members must have a minimum five years’ experience.

Also, the underlying investments of the qualifying CIS may consist only of the following assets: transferable securities, money market instruments, deposits, units in other CIS vehicles or financial derivatives. To eliminate any doubt, a qualifying CIS must not engage in non-permissible activities such as securities lending, repurchase transactions and direct lending of monies.

Once approval is obtained from the home regulator, the following documents must be submitted to the host regulator together with the Asean CIS application form:

  • a letter issued by the home regulator stating the CIS has been approved for public offering in the home jurisdiction and that there is no objection to the CIS being deemed an Asean CIS;
  • offering documents, which must be in compliance with the host jurisdiction’s laws and regulations;
  • an undertaking to submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the host jurisdiction’s courts; and
  • other documents that may be required by the host regulator including other application forms used in the host jurisdiction.

All documents submitted to the host regulator must be written in English and may also need to be translated into the official language of the host jurisdiction. Thailand, for example, requires submission of a fact sheet for the Asean CIS prepared by a local intermediary in Thai. The time frame for this review is subject to the host regulator’s discretion.

A host regulator also retains the right to decline a qualifying CIS operator’s application if, for example, it deems the application contains any false or misleading information or it is not satisfied the host jurisdiction’s laws are being complied with.

Post-approval obligations: Upon approval, a qualifying CIS may be offered to the general public in a host jurisdiction, provided the operator meets the following obligations:

  • The offer in a host jurisdiction may be made only through locally licensed or regulated intermediaries in that host jurisdiction;
  • A qualifying CIS operator is required to appoint an independent auditor to conduct an annual audit of the qualifying CIS operator covering, at a minimum, the compliance with the
  • standards of a qualifying CIS; and
  • A qualifying CIS operator is required to inform both the home and host regulators of significant changes to the qualifying CIS operator or the Asean CIS.

In addition, host regulators may require the qualifying CIS operator similarly to notify investors in the Asean CIS.

More products and improved efficiency: The Asean CIS Framework promises to increase the range of products and provide fund managers with a direct and efficient route to offer funds to retail investors in other Asean members. This is a welcome step towards achieving the vision of an integrated Asean Economic Community under the Asean Capital Markets Forum Implementation Plan.

 

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Banking and Finance

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
Read More
August 11, 2026
Cambodia’s Ministry of Justice has launched a new platform on its official website to publish notices of forced sales issued by each municipal and provincial court of first instance. The platform’s stated purpose is to inform the public and facilitate greater participation in forced-sale auctions conducted in connection with court-ordered enforcement proceedings. How the Platform Works The platform publishes forced-sale notices from courts of first instance across Cambodia’s municipalities and provinces and includes a link where the public can view properties currently subject to forced sale. To participate in a forced-sale auction, individuals can download Khmer-language bidding application forms through links provided on the platform. The form typically requires the applicant’s name, sex, year of birth, identity card number and issue date, and address, together with details identifying the immovable property (including its ownership certificate number), the relevant enforcement case number and date, and the reference to the public auction or tender announcement issued by the court. Completed application forms must be submitted directly to the specific municipal or provincial court that issued the forced sale. For further inquiries about a particular forced sale, interested parties should likewise contact the relevant municipal or provincial court. Forced Sale of Immovable Property in Cambodia The publication of these notices relates to the forced sale procedure for immovable property under Cambodia’s Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). Unlike property seizure by a court, a forced sale is a compulsory execution proceeding—a subsequent enforcement step that arises only after an underlying dispute has been adjudicated and a debtor fails to pay the debt or outstanding amount due under a final and binding judgment or other enforceable title of execution. For the purposes of this procedure, the term “immovable property” under the CPC refers to land, registered buildings, jointly held shares of such property, registered
Read More
August 3, 2026
On July 23, 2026, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) released for public comment its draft Notification on Digital Channel Security, which would significantly expand the scope and stringency of Thailand’s existing mobile banking security framework. If finalized in its current form, the draft notification would extend mandatory security requirements to credit card providers and credit providers, cover internet banking in addition to mobile applications, phase out SMS one-time passwords (OTPs) for transaction authentication, and introduce biometric verification requirements for high-value transactions. The public comment period is open through August 24, 2026. Background The BOT’s existing Mobile Banking Security Notification, issued in 2024, sets minimum security standards for financial institutions, specialized financial institutions (SFIs), and e-money providers, significantly reducing “money-draining app” fraud. However, fraudsters have since shifted to nonbank providers and internet banking channels, prompting the BOT to propose broader security requirements. Expanded Scope of Regulated Entities and Channels The existing Mobile Banking Security Notification covers only financial institutions, SFIs, and e-money providers offering mobile banking services. The draft expands coverage in two key areas: entities and channels. On the entity side, it adds credit card providers and credit providers that offer fund transfers to third parties at other financial service providers or that provide cash withdrawal services to individual retail customers. On the channel side, it broadens coverage to include internet banking in addition to mobile banking. Strengthened Customer Authentication The draft introduces enhanced authentication requirements in three areas: Service enrollment and device changes. Providers must implement rigorous identity verification, notify customers of enrollment results through out-of-band communication channels, and adopt risk-mitigation measures such as cooling-off periods and temporary transaction limits. Transaction-level authentication. Providers must use two-factor authentication for fund transfers, cardless ATM withdrawals, and transaction limit increases. Secure authentication factors. Key requirements include the following: “What-you-know” factors must
Read More
July 27, 2026
A new decree on penalties for violations related to the crypto asset market creates compliance risks for offshore crypto asset exchanges in Vietnam that do not hold, and practically cannot obtain, a Vietnamese license, and for Vietnamese users who continue to transact on those platforms. Decree No. 284/2026/ND-CP (Decree 284), issued by the government of Vietnam on July 16, 2026, formally establishes an administrative penalty framework for violations related to crypto assets and the crypto asset market. The decree takes effect on September 1, 2026, and will remain in force for the duration of the five-year pilot program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, which is scheduled to end in September 2030. Direct Penalties on Vietnamese Users The most immediate commercial risk to offshore platforms is that their Vietnamese users now face direct personal liability for using their exchanges. Vietnamese users who trade crypto assets outside of a Ministry of Finance-licensed service provider face fines of up to VND 50 million (approximately USD 1,900). Vietnamese users trading in crypto assets that are offered or issued to foreign users face higher penalties of up to VND 100 million (approximately USD 3,800). It is expected that Vietnamese users will be more willing to migrate away from offshore platforms now that there is a risk of real enforcement against them. Penalties on Unlicensed Service Providers Violations of providing crypto asset services or advertising crypto-related services without a license face fines of up to VND 200 million (approximately USD 7,700). Operating a crypto asset trading market without proper authorization falls within the same highest penalty bands. Organizations that violate issuance, provision, or disclosure rules may face fines of up to VND 200 million. Although the maximum administrative fine per violation is capped at VND 200 million for organizations and VND 100 million for individuals, these
Read More