You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 5, 2012

Import Challenges for Cosmetic Products

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

By harmonizing the technical regulations governing the cosmetics industry in the ASEAN region over the past few years, the ASEAN Cosmetics Association has been the driving force toward better quality and standards. This harmonization has also helped remove trade barriers under the ASEAN Free Trade Area.

The ASEAN Harmonized Cosmetic Regulatory Scheme (AHCRS) has set out the requirements for cosmetic products for all signatories, including Thailand, since January 1, 2008. Since then, a product manufactured or marketed in any signatory country can enter any other signatory country if it complies with the AHCRS requirements.

By harmonizing their regulations, the ten ASEAN countries, and particularly Thailand, have become an extremely attractive market in which cosmetics distributors can expand their businesses. There are, however, some technical regulations that have not been harmonized as they are subject to national controls, such as the restrictions on importation into Thailand.

Importing for Personal Use

The Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set forth clear guidelines to differentiate between cosmetic product imports intended for personal use and for sale. If a person brings into Thailand more than six items of the same cosmetic product from another country, the Import and Export Inspector from the Thai FDA at the port will conclude that the person intends to import the products for local sale.

Registration Requirements

When importing products for sale, each ASEAN country requires individual registration with the regulatory authorities where the product will be marketed. In Thailand, the FDA is flexible in allowing either a company or an individual to register as a distributor for a cosmetics business. And there is no limitation on the number of importers of one product, so the same product, with the same name, can be imported by several companies.

The Thai FDA requires that the company or person who intends to place any cosmetic on the market must register as an importer with the FDA, as well as register the product itself after the FDA approves the company’s or individual’s registration.

Using the established registration process, many individuals have tried to register themselves as authorized marketers or importers of a broad range of cosmetic products—even well-known products that are already registered with the FDA. These individuals have all eventually failed, as they are unable to produce the specific documentation the FDA requires for product registration. This includes, for example, the full ingredient listing and percentages of all ingredients contained in the product formula. This is important because this kind of information is extremely confidential and belongs only to the product owner and its authorized marketer.

A letter of authorization from the product owner or manufacturer is also required, especially when a well-known product brand is already registered with the FDA. It appears that some of these individuals lack the knowledge and experience to be importers or authorized marketers in accordance with FDA practice.

The FDA has also become more rigorous in post-marketing steps. FDA officials now regularly conduct random inspections of importers. Thai cosmetic companies are therefore required to prepare the four parts of the product information files, which consist of more detailed product information, in case they are randomly inspected.

Parallel Import

Importing cosmetics products into Thailand also creates some uncertainties with regard to parallel imports. For example, a manufacturer might give exclusive authorization to different distributors to sell its products in Malaysia and Thailand. The Malaysian distributor might then decide that it wishes to export the product to Thailand. In doing so, the Malaysian distributor will be required to carry out the registration process, and the Thai FDA will still be in a position to authorize the registration and import of such cosmetics on the basis that all documents have been provided.

If this happens, the Thai distributor, who had independently reached an agreement with the foreign manufacturer to be the only distributor in Thailand, will no longer be the exclusive distributor. The Thai importer would also not be able to claim trademark infringement against the Malaysian distributor. This is because Thailand recognizes the principle of exhaustion of rights. This principle holds that once a product has legally entered the market somewhere (in this case, in Malaysia), then resale of the product anywhere in the world no longer constitutes trademark infringement.

Faced with this scenario, the only available option is for the foreign manufacturer to claim breach of the contract it signed with the parallel importer (the Malaysian distributor), provided a clause exists that indicates that such distributor will not sell outside its designated territory.

In summary, if an individual wishes to import cosmetics into Thailand, he or she should first check the requirements, and then ensure that if they have a distribution agreement with the foreign manufacturer, sufficient provisions are included to allow them to enforce their rights.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 10, 2026
On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels. The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period. Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging. The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content. For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml. Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING). Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a
Read More
August 10, 2026
The drug registration process in Vietnam will be simplified, particularly for foreign applicants, following the recent issuance by Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) of a new circular that is expected to reduce administrative hurdles. Circular No. 32/2026/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and medicinal ingredients (Circular 32) was issued on July 29, 2026, and will take effect on October 1, 2026, replacing Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT. Key provisions of the new circular are discussed below. Five-Year Data Exclusivity and Five-Month Public Disclosure Framework Circular 32 updates data protection guidelines by explicitly referencing Article 128 of the amended Intellectual Property Law, which sets out that new drugs supported by clinical trial data submitted for the first time will be granted a five-year data exclusivity period from the date of the initial marketing authorization (MA) approval. Subsequent applications that rely on the originator’s protected data will not be eligible for approval from the date of submission of the originator’s registration dossier until five years after the first MA is granted. Furthermore, in accordance with the new regulations, the regulatory authority must publicly disclose information on subsequent applications five months before the granting of MA, providing originator companies with an opportunity to exercise and enforce their intellectual property rights. Simplified Requirements for Foreign Legal Documents Circular 32 expands the circumstances under which legal documents issued by foreign authorities are exempt from consular legalization and authenticity verification requirements. Specifically, such documents may be exempt if the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) is able to verify their authenticity directly through official electronic means, including written confirmation or email correspondence sent directly to the MOH by the competent foreign authority, or publicly accessible English-language databases maintained by recognized foreign regulatory authorities. In addition, the new circular permits the submission of electronic notarized copies of legal documents
Read More
July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
Read More
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
Read More