You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 16, 2012

Logistics Services in Thailand under the AEC

Informed Counsel

Italian-Thai Development Plc, a major Thai construction company, has been making headlines in the region due to its major investment in building the Dawei Deep-Sea Port and Infrastructure Project in Myanmar. Located roughly 300 kilometers from the Thai border, this USD 8.6 billion project will open the gate for import and export of goods from countries to the east of Thailand, like Cambodia, and those to the north, like Laos and China, through Thailand to Myanmar via Kanchanaburi province.

This new shipping route—and other major projects that will move forward under the ASEAN Economic Community—will depend on a thriving regional logistics industry. To help drive this growth, Thailand is now moving to strengthen its local logistics operators and amend the legislative framework to allow for greater foreign investment in the sector as the AEC approaches.

Increasing Regional Competition

In Thailand, domestic transportation and other services businesses are among the activities restricted by the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA), under which foreign shareholding cannot exceed 49% of the total shareholding in an entity. The logistics industry is one of the services in which equity participation in ASEAN countries is set to change under the AEC. The AEC Blueprint currently allows equity participation of 51%, which will increase to 70% by 2013.

Given the variety of logistics services—ranging from maritime cargo handling services to warehousing to customs clearance and more—the development of competitive logistics businesses in Thailand will require not only financial capability, but also technological know-how. As other ASEAN member states increase their equity participation in Thai businesses to up to 70%, local players will need to develop their capacity in order to compete effectively.

Developing Local Capacity

The Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board is aware of the need to develop the local industry. To take action, it has divided Thailand’s logistics sector into a business framework across five types of activities: (1) cargo transportation inside and outside the country, by road, rail, sea, or air; (2) cargo storage, warehousing, packaging, and cargo distribution; (3) customs formalities; (4) other auxiliary logistics works; and (5) postal and parcel services.

According to company registration statistics, more than 70% of Thai logistics businesses involved in these activities are small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with less than THB 5 million capital. For these operators to compete with global firms, the government agencies involved in these activities will open a dialogue with the private sector in order to form a master plan to implement laws and regulations or procedures.

To develop local logistic businesses, several weaknesses need to be remedied. These weaknesses include lack of basic data and technical information, lack of capital investment, lack of manpower in the field, and inefficient connection among transportation modes. The Thai government has laid out plans to remedy these weaknesses, one of which is to draft new legislation to promote and develop the Thai logistics industry. This legislation has not yet been enacted, but the provisions of the draft bill express methods to tackle the key issues.

Possible Legislative Changes

Under the draft bill, the definition of “Thai logistic business” is a company not less than 50% owned by Thai individuals with the majority of its directors Thai nationals. Once the law is enacted, a special committee will be set up with the duty to set policies suitable for logistics business operators, improve laws and regulations to enhance efficiency, etc.

Privileges will also be granted such as exempting or reducing corporate income tax or value added tax, and allowing shippers of goods from Thailand to other countries a deduction of 50% of the service provided by promoted logistics business operators from net income. Also under the bill, government agencies and state enterprises will be encouraged to use services from promoted logistics operators; training for personnel in administration, marketing, and technology will be developed; logistics businesses will be expanded outside Thailand; and new rules and procedures will be implemented.

Other local laws relating to the logistics industry, such as the Thai Vessels Act, Air Navigation Act, Land Transportation Act, Automobile Act, State Railway of Thailand Act, Multimodal Transport Act, and Merchant Marine Promotion Act, also need to be taken into consideration. In this respect, it is essential for the Thai government to consider whether these laws will require amendment, so that local logistics operators will be able to compete with investors from other ASEAN member states.

Due to Thailand’s location in the center of the ASEAN region, with a long coastal area, deep-sea ports, and modern infrastructure, the Thai government is aware of the necessity to set up a government agency to assist local logistics business operators, such as by providing information of logistics business operators of other ASEAN countries and updating laws and regulations affecting the logistics sector.

Implications for Foreign Business Act

These actions intended to develop local capacity are likely to provide a good first step toward strengthening Thailand’s logistics industry. At the same time, it will be interesting to monitor the next steps of the Ministry of Commerce, which is the government organization responsible for company registration and Foreign Business Act compliance.

As discussed above, the AEC Blueprint allows for 70% equity participation, whereas the FBA restricts foreign shareholding. Logistics businesses cover domestic land, waterway, and air transport, which is classified under List Two of the FBA, and other services such as packaging, which is classified under List Three of the FBA. Each list provides certain restrictions on equity participation by foreigners.

With the new equity participation percentage under the AEC Blueprint, it is likely that, in practice, the officials of the Department of Business Development at the Ministry of Commerce may rely on exceptions available under the FBA for granting licenses to ASEAN investors to operate logistics business in Thailand. This would allow them to adhere to the AEC Blueprint without the need to amend current, or implement new, legislation.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 23, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins’ Bangkok-based aviation specialists have authored the Thailand chapter of Aviation Finance & Leasing 2026 from Chambers and Partners. This annual guide examines the key legal issues impacting aircraft lessors, lessees, and financiers in nearly 40 jurisdictions worldwide. In addition to the Thailand chapter, Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Vietnam chapter to this year’s edition. The Thailand chapter offers a comprehensive overview of the country’s legal framework governing all aspects of aircraft sale and purchase, aircraft and engine leasing, and aircraft debt finance. Some topics covered include: sale and lease agreement terms taxation lease registration and enforcement lease assignment/novation insurance and reinsurance debt structuring securities liens The guide also examines other matters with practical implications for the aviation industry’s day-to-day operations. Chambers and Partners’ Global Practice Guides provide in-house counsel with authoritative commentary on practical legal issues affecting business, enabling readers to compare legislation and procedures across multiple jurisdictions. The Thailand chapter of Aviation Finance & Leasing 2026 is available as a PDF through the button below. The full guide can be accessed for free on the Chambers and Partners website.
July 23, 2026
Aviation law experts from Tilleke & Gibbins’ Vietnam offices have prepared the Vietnam chapter of Aviation Finance & Leasing 2026 from Chambers and Partners. Covering nearly 40 jurisdictions worldwide, the guide addresses key legal considerations for aircraft lessors, lessees, and financiers. Alongside the Vietnam chapter, Tilleke & Gibbins also provided the Thailand chapter for this year’s edition. The Vietnam chapter delivers detailed insights into the legal environment affecting aircraft sale and purchase, aircraft and engine leasing, and aircraft debt finance. Some of the topics it examines include: sale and lease agreement terms taxation lease registration and enforcement lease assignment/novation insurance and reinsurance debt structuring securities liens The guide also covers other issues influencing the day-to-day activities of aviation industry participants in Vietnam. Chambers and Partners’ Global Practice Guides provide in-house counsel with authoritative analysis of practical legal matters impacting business, enabling readers to compare legislation and relevant procedures across leading jurisdictions. The Vietnam chapter of Aviation Finance & Leasing 2026 is available as a PDF through the button below. The full guide can be accessed for free on the Chambers and Partners website.
February 20, 2026
Thailand’s Supreme Administrative Court has issued a decisive ruling annulling the Ministry of Labor’s notification that had granted an exemption for foreign pilots to fly domestic routes under wet‑lease arrangements. A wet lease is a leasing arrangement in which the aircraft is provided together with its foreign flight crew, including pilots, and related operational support, rather than the airline supplying its own pilots. The judgment, delivered on November 17, 2025, and published in the Government Gazette on January 30, 2026, follows a legal challenge brought by the Thai Pilots Association, which argued that the exemption unlawfully enabled foreign workers to assume a role traditionally reserved for Thai nationals. The notification in question, dated December 13, 2024, authorized foreign pilots who came as part of wet‑leased aircraft to fly domestic routes. The Thai Pilots Association disputed the legality of this rationale, asserting that the exemption was triggered by a private airline’s request rather than by any statutory necessity. The Ministry of Labor justified this measure by relying on aircraft‑specific approvals issued by the Ministry of Transport and by enabling the Department of Employment to issue corresponding work permits. Arguments Presented in the Case The Thai Pilots Association argued that the exemption undermined the interests of domestic pilots and conflicted with the policy intent of Thailand’s foreign‑worker regulatory framework. The lawsuit emphasized that the notification arose directly from a private airline company’s request to operate two A320 aircraft under a wet lease and that the measure had the practical effect of displacing Thai pilots who remained unemployed. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Labor defended the exemption as a temporary and necessary response to industry shortages and part of national efforts to support tourism and restore aviation capacity. Legal Framework Thai law establishes a general prohibition against foreign nationals piloting domestic aircraft. Section
December 4, 2025
Thailand has expanded the circumstances under which state agencies may bypass competitive bidding procedures to address urgent security challenges. On November 28, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Finance published the Ministerial Regulation Determining Cases of Procurement by Specific Method (No. 6) B.E. 2568 in the Royal Gazette, introducing a new pathway for procuring supplies and services needed to address cyber and military threats that may affect the stability of government agencies or the nation. For technology vendors, cybersecurity firms, and defense contractors, this regulatory change creates immediate opportunities to engage directly with government buyers facing urgent security challenges. New Fast-Track Category for Security Threats The regulation amends Thailand’s Public Procurement and Supplies Management Act B.E. 2560 (2017) to add a new category of procurement that qualifies for the “specific method”—a noncompetitive, direct selection process. Previously, agencies could use this expedited method only in limited circumstances, such as emergencies, cases with proprietary technology requirements, or national security operations. The new provision explicitly covers procurement of supplies related to preventing or resolving cyber or military threats that could impact the stability of a state agency or the country. This addition recognizes the urgent nature of modern security challenges, where competitive bidding timelines may leave agencies vulnerable during critical threat windows. State agencies dealing with active cyberattacks, preparing defensive measures against anticipated threats, or responding to military security concerns can now move directly to negotiate with qualified vendors rather than conducting lengthy public tender processes. Vendor Considerations Vendors offering cybersecurity solutions now have a regulatory avenue to work directly with government clients when stability concerns are present. These solutions include threat detection systems, anti-ransomware tools, incident response services, firewalls, and security consulting. Similarly, defense contractors providing military equipment or specialized security supplies can pursue direct engagement channels where traditional procurement methods would create