You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 4, 2020

Laos Provides Tax Relief and Other Measures to Reduce the Economic Impact of COVID-19

Subscribe to Updates

On April 2, the prime minister of Laos issued the Decision on the Policies and Measures to Reduce the Impact from the COVID-19 Pandemic. A number of the measures announced will affect locally established business operators.

Relief Measures

The latest decision reiterates previously issued measures from the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Laos (see here and here). The most salient new measures provided in the decision are primarily concerned with tax relief as follows:

  • Salary tax exemption for both private and public sector employees, applicable for monthly salaries below LAK 5 million (approx. USD 550), in effect from April to June.
  • Deferment of payments for affected businesses, including normal contributions to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF), in effect for the months of April to June. The new deadline for contributions to the NSSF has not yet been specified.
  • Profit tax exemption for micro-enterprises from April to June.
  • Exemption from customs duties, tax, and related official fees, on medical devices and other products for prevention, control, and preparation in regard to COVID-19 (e.g., masks, sanitizers, medical equipment, and other necessary items—a more detailed list will be provided later).
  • Postponement of tax obligations for eligible business operators in the tourism industry for the months of April to June 2020. A detailed list of the businesses that will benefit from this provision will be provided by the Ministry of Information, Culture, and Tourism.

Other measures in the decision include postponement of the payment of annual road tax to June 30; confirmation of the Bank of Laos’ proposal to decrease the interest rate and ratio of the compulsory reserve for private commercial banks; and an announcement that the government is studying the possibility of reducing and deferring electricity and water bill payments for both individuals and businesses.

Public Sector Expenditures

The prime minister stated that large-scale investment projects should be encouraged to maintain their ongoing operations, private investment should be facilitated, and ministries and local authorities should decrease their usual administrative expenses by at least 10% of their budget for 2020. Expenses that will be reduced include those relating to (1) meetings and seminars, (2) welcoming of foreign guests, (3) scientific studies, (4) construction expenses, (5) national celebrations, (6) fixed assets, and (7) other expenses. The resulting cost savings will be redirected to the government’s COVID-19 prevention efforts.

New public investment infrastructure projects that have already been approved by the National Assembly in 2020 will be delayed to 2021. Projects deemed to be overvalued or to have a limited impact will be reassessed and suspended or renegotiated.

Lao Airlines is singled out as a state enterprise that may need to adapt its business plan, and it should be ready to resume its activities as soon as the COVID-19 pandemic has passed.

Comments

As is the case in many other jurisdictions, the government of Laos has taken a series of extraordinary measures over the past week to address the far-reaching impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, and these further clarifications by the prime minister are welcome. Further details will be required in regard to the deadlines and eligibility for some of the relief measures, and we expect that these issues will be treated on a case-by-case basis by the line ministries until further explanations are provided through official channels.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Employment

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 11, 2026
Cambodia’s Ministry of Justice has launched a new platform on its official website to publish notices of forced sales issued by each municipal and provincial court of first instance. The platform’s stated purpose is to inform the public and facilitate greater participation in forced-sale auctions conducted in connection with court-ordered enforcement proceedings. How the Platform Works The platform publishes forced-sale notices from courts of first instance across Cambodia’s municipalities and provinces and includes a link where the public can view properties currently subject to forced sale. To participate in a forced-sale auction, individuals can download Khmer-language bidding application forms through links provided on the platform. The form typically requires the applicant’s name, sex, year of birth, identity card number and issue date, and address, together with details identifying the immovable property (including its ownership certificate number), the relevant enforcement case number and date, and the reference to the public auction or tender announcement issued by the court. Completed application forms must be submitted directly to the specific municipal or provincial court that issued the forced sale. For further inquiries about a particular forced sale, interested parties should likewise contact the relevant municipal or provincial court. Forced Sale of Immovable Property in Cambodia The publication of these notices relates to the forced sale procedure for immovable property under Cambodia’s Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). Unlike property seizure by a court, a forced sale is a compulsory execution proceeding—a subsequent enforcement step that arises only after an underlying dispute has been adjudicated and a debtor fails to pay the debt or outstanding amount due under a final and binding judgment or other enforceable title of execution. For the purposes of this procedure, the term “immovable property” under the CPC refers to land, registered buildings, jointly held shares of such property, registered
Read More
August 6, 2026
Every month, VAT-registered businesses in Thailand calculate their output and input VAT and file a return to pay the net amount due or claim a refund. Yet a common and costly dispute arises when a business that has paid input VAT to its supplier—and done everything asked of it—later finds that input VAT rejected on the grounds that the tax invoice was issued by “a person not entitled to issue tax invoices.” In these cases, a buyer may have confirmed the supplier’s VAT registration on the Revenue Department’s website, paid through the banking system, received a complete tax invoice, and kept full payment and inventory records. Even so, if the Revenue Department later determines that the supplier did not genuinely make the sale or collected the VAT without remitting it, the department can disallow the input VAT and assess additional tax, surcharge, and penalty—often more than a year after the transaction. A new article from tax and dispute resolution specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok examines how the Revenue Department and the courts approach these disputes, including two recent Supreme Court (Tax Division) decisions confirming that the taxpayer bears the burden of proving a supplier genuinely sold and delivered the goods and received payment. It considers why the VAT registration system offers no legal safe harbor, why the evidentiary burden falls hardest on online and cross-border transactions where buyers and sellers never meet, and how the Revenue Department’s own digital infrastructure could detect non-remitting suppliers at the source rather than shifting the loss to good-faith buyers. The article also sets out practical guidance: how to build a comprehensive “know-your-supplier” file at the time of a transaction, the procedural steps and strict deadlines for challenging a VAT assessment, and why dispute readiness belongs alongside tax planning at the center
Read More
July 30, 2026
Thailand’s cabinet has approved a draft ministerial regulation introducing significant changes to the calculation of old-age pension and old-age gratuity benefits under the Social Security Fund. The reform would replace the current pension calculation method with a career average revalued earnings (CARE) model designed to better reflect an individual’s lifetime contributions while supporting the long-term financial sustainability of the Social Security Fund. The changes are also intended to improve fairness and align Thailand’s pension framework with international practices. Key proposed changes under the draft ministerial regulation are outlined below. CARE-Based Formula for Old-Age Pension Calculations Currently, old-age pensions are calculated based on the insured person’s average salary over the preceding 60 months. The proposed regulation would replace this approach with the CARE model, under which pension benefits will be calculated based on earnings throughout an individual’s entire working life. Historical earnings will be revalued to reflect their present value before the pension benefit is calculated. According to the Ministry of Labor, this change is intended to better align pension benefits with an individual’s lifetime contribution history and provide a fairer basis for calculating benefits. Pension Accrual Rate for Contributions Exceeding 180 Months Under the current rules, insured persons who contribute for more than 180 months receive an additional pension accrual of 1.5% for each completed 12-month contribution period, with any remaining months disregarded. The proposed regulation would instead calculate the additional accrual on a monthly basis at a rate of 0.125% of actual monthly contributions; this aims to make pension benefits more accurately reflect the actual duration of each individual’s contribution history. Transitional Protections for Insured Persons The draft regulation includes transitional protections for both existing pension recipients and those who will become eligible within five years of the CARE model taking effect. For existing recipients, the following protections
Read More
July 15, 2026
On July 8, 2026, Thailand enacted a new law significantly expanding the framework for government service delivery and licensing facilitation. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Services Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Facilitation Act 2026) replaces and expands the framework of governmental services under the Facilitation of Official Licensing Consideration Act B.E. 2558 (2015) (Facilitation Act 2015) and broadens its scope to cover public services, administrative processes, and public benefits. The Facilitation Act 2026 aims to modernize government services by promoting e-filing, reducing administrative burdens and repeated document requests, and improving predictability. For businesses, this should ease compliance and shorten approval timelines, subject to implementing regulations and agency readiness. Public Services Facilitation Scope The Facilitation Act 2015 applied mainly to permissions, registrations, and notifications required before conducting activities that require licenses, certificates, permits, approvals, or registrations. The Facilitation Act 2026 broadens this framework to include public services and other benefits, such as welfare, subsidies, and grants, provided to Thai citizens, expanding government agencies’ responsibilities beyond licensing facilitation into a wider administrative-service framework. It also introduces a broader definition of “government agency” to include central, regional, and local government bodies, state enterprises, public organizations, and other state entities. Licensing Changes The Facilitation Act 2026 introduces a “super license” (termed a “main license” under the act) that exempts the holder from obtaining multiple related or ancillary licenses issued by different government agencies. Obtaining a super license deems the licensee to have automatically obtained the related “sublicenses” required to conduct the relevant activities. The cabinet will designate eligible activities by royal decree. The act also introduces an expedited licensing option, allowing applicants to pay an additional fee to fast-track their applications in urgent cases. Expedited processing must not interfere with standard application timelines. The criteria, procedures, conditions, and fees for expedited licensing
Read More