You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 27, 2016

The Hague Agreement and Thailand’s Design System

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Under the ASEAN IPR Action Plan—a plan to harmonize intellectual property (IP) systems in the region—member countries such as Thailand are expected to join the Hague Agreement, which allows applicants to register a design in any number of participating countries by filing a single application. This saves applicants time and costs, compared with filing a separate application in each country where they want to register their design.

As Thailand is not yet a member of the Hague Agreement, this article looks at the process of applying for a design under the agreement, its impact on the European Union as a standard-bearer, and the possibility of integrating the agreement into Thailand’s design system.

Application Process

Under the Hague Agreement, instead of filing separate applications in different countries, applicants designate the countries in which they want to register their design at the time of filing an application at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). WIPO then examines the application to ensure that the correct formalities have been followed.

Applicants from countries that belong to the Hague Agreement must follow certain formality rules. For example, they must allow dotted or broken lines in parts of a design where protection is not sought. Photographs or other graphic representations are allowed. If an application meets the formality requirements, WIPO will publish the design in the International Design Bulletin. The countries designated in the application are notified, after which they must examine the application according to their own design laws.

Each country must decide whether to register or reject the design within six months. If a country has an objection system, it has 12 months to render a decision. Conditions that are acceptable in one country may not be acceptable in another, so an applicant needs to ascertain each country’s requirements before filing an application.

Impact on the European Union

The EU joined the Hague Agreement in 2008. When a design application designating the EU as the registration jurisdiction is filed and published, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) receives a notification from WIPO and examines the application.

EUIPO examines whether the design complies with Article 9 of the Community Design Regulation, which does not allow a design to be registered if it is contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality. Then it sends a notification of either refusal or acceptance to WIPO, which forwards the notification to the applicant.

If a notification of refusal is issued, the applicant can amend the application and may submit a response directly to EUIPO. If EUIPO finds that the applicant has overcome the refusal, it issues a notice to withdraw the refusal.

EUIPO requires the representation of each design to consist of at least one view, and each design is limited to seven views. There can be more than one design in an application as long as they are all in the same Locarno Classification or international classification of industrial design. The term of protection is five years from the date of filing, and this can be renewed for additional terms of five years each, up to 25 years.

Thailand’s Design System

Thailand’s design system differs from that of the EU under the Hague Agreement in a number of ways. A Thai design application requires a claim and seven views of the design with some exceptions such as surface patterns that do not have any dimensions. The representations include top, bottom, left, right, front, back, and perspective views. Only one design is allowed per application.

Even if there is a variation of the design, a separate application must be filed for each variation. Dotted or dashed lines cannot be used in representations of the design. The prosecution process begins with a preliminary examination.

If the requirements are met, the application is published. The objection period lasts for 90 days after the date of publication. After the objection period, the application is substantively examined. To receive protection, the design must be new. The term of protection is ten years from the date the application was filed in Thailand, and extensions are not available.

Hague Compliance

Before Thailand accedes to the Hague Agreement, a number of changes must be made to the country’s current design system. Some considerations include whether Thailand should remove substantive examination, keep the requirement to have a claim, extend the terms of protection, and accept multiple design applications.

In addition, the Intellectual Property Department has a limited number of examiners, meaning that deciding whether to register or reject a design within 12 months may be challenging. To speed up the process and meet this requirement, the department may consider combining preliminary examination with substantive examination or eliminating substantive examination altogether.

Changes to Thailand’s design system must be made before the country accedes to the Hague Agreement. Once these changes are made, the country will be able to fulfill its obligations as an ASEAN member, and applicants will benefit from reduced times and costs to register designs.

Related Professionals

RELATED INSIGHTS​

July 24, 2024
Experts from Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property team have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam to Thomson Reuters Practical Law, a high-level comparative overview of  laws and regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Intellectual Property Transactions focuses on business-related aspects of intellectual property, such as the value of intellectual assets in M&A transactions, and the licensing of IP portfolios. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations. IP audits. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence, warranties/indemnities, and transfer of IPRs. Employee and consultant agreements. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Intellectual property specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Thailand have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview for Thomson Reuters Practical Law, an online publication that provides comprehensive legal guides for jurisdictions worldwide. The Thailand overview was authored by Darani Vachanavuttivong, managing partner of Tilleke & Gibbins and managing director of the firm’s regional IP practice; Titikaan Ungbhakorn, senior associate and patent agent; and San Chaithiraphant, senior associate. The chapter delivers a high-level examination of critical aspects of IP law, including IP assignment and licensing, research and development collaborations, IP in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), securing loans with intellectual property rights, settlement agreements, employee-related IP issues, competition law, taxation, and non-tariff trade barriers. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations: Management of improvements, derivatives, and joint ownership of IP. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence and critical considerations during mergers and acquisitions. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Acted as lead counsel for Nordic Transport Group A/S (NTG), an international freight forwarding company based in Denmark, in its acquisition of a stake in Asia-based Freightzen Logistics Ltd., Inc. through a newly established subsidiary, NTG APAC Holding Pte. Ltd.
July 23, 2024
In the Who’s Who Legal (WWL) Southeast Asia guide for 2024, a total of 12 Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers have been distinguished as market leaders in various legal practice areas. The firm’s 12 recognized lawyers, singled out for their commitment to delivering exceptional legal services to Tilleke & Gibbins’ clients, are grouped into seven practice areas: Asset Recovery: Thawat Damsa-ard Data: Alan Adcock, Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh Franchise: Alan Adcock, Jay Cohen Intellectual Property: Alan Adcock (Patents, Trademarks), Darani Vachanavuttivong (Patents, Trademarks), Kasama Sriwatanakul (Trademarks), Linh Thi Mai Nguyen (Trademarks), Somboon Earterasarun (Trademarks), Wongrat Ratanaprayul (Patents) Investigations: John Frangos and Thawat Damsa-ard Labor, Employment, and Benefits: Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut Life Sciences: Alan Adcock, Loc Xuan Le The annual WWL Southeast Asia rankings guide, published by the London-based group Law Business Research, aims to identify the foremost legal practitioners across a range of business law practice areas. The rankings are largely based on feedback and nominations received from other WWL-ranked and nominated attorneys around the world. These peer-driven recognitions highlight Tilleke & Gibbins’ dedication to maintaining the highest standards of legal service and helping clients achieve success. To read more about the WWL Southeast Asia guide, or to browse the full results, please visit the WWL website.