You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2016

Vietnam’s New Pharmaceutical Law

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

The National Assembly of Vietnam adopted a new Law on Pharmacy on June 4, 2016. The new law will take effect on January 1, 2017, replacing the current version which was passed in 2005. In an effort to update certain aspects of Vietnam’s legal framework to be more in line with international practices, the new pharmaceutical law is expected to provide quicker access to drugs for patients, increased consumer protection, and more incentives for local manufacturing of drugs.

Removing the Five-Year Rule for Clinical Trials

Under the Law on Pharmacy of 2005, which is currently in effect, before a new drug can be circulated in Vietnam, it must undergo clinical trials in Vietnam for registration purposes. The drug is only exempted from this requirement if it has already been circulated legally for at least five years in its country of origin. As a result, unless costly and cumbersome clinical trials are performed, Vietnamese patients have to wait at least five years to gain access to new drugs that have already been approved for circulation in other countries.

Under the new Law on Pharmacy, this barrier has been lifted. Accordingly, the clinical trial requirement would be waived for all new drugs, except vaccines, provided that they have sufficient clinical data on safety and efficiency and are circulated in at least one country anywhere in the world. With this change, Vietnamese patients will gain earlier access to new drugs, especially those that treat life-threatening diseases. Pharmaceutical companies will also benefit by not being forced to repeat clinical trials that have already been performed.

Expanding Retail of OTC Drugs

The new Law on Pharmacy allows certain non-prescription drugs, also known as over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, to be sold by a business establishment that does not have a certificate of eligibility for pharmaceutical business. These establishments include, among others, venues that have drug counters or cabinets, such as supermarkets.

Although the list of OTC drugs is not yet available and the relevant establishments still need to satisfy certain criteria on storage conditions and human resources, this is still a major change, as it appears likely to provide consumers with improved access to certain OTC drugs.

Acknowledging Patient Assistance Programs

Article 42 of the new law permits pharmaceutical companies to provide free drugs to health establishments through a patient assistance program. Previously, pharmaceutical companies always had to be concerned as to whether directly conducting such programs would be in breach of the law, as conducting promotional activities in relation to drugs targeting patients is prohibited in Vietnam.

Recognizing Clinical Pharmacology

The new Law on Pharmacy provides a separate chapter dedicated to clinical pharmacology, instead of scattered regulations as in the previous law. The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that drugs will be used in a reasonable, safe, and effective manner. While the contents of this chapter are cursory, its existence suggests that the government views clinical pharmacology and drug safety as an important issue.

Permitting Parallel Imports

  The new Law on Pharmacy specifically allows parallel import of drugs as long as the price of the parallel-imported product is lower than the price of the original brand-name drug currently being circulated in Vietnam. Though the general concept of parallel imports is not new to the pharmaceutical industry in Vietnam, this is the first time that a regulation on parallel imports has been promulgated under a law.

Incentivizing Local Manufacturing

The new Law on Pharmacy clearly shows that national policy prioritizes the purchase of domestically produced products, including domestically manufactured generics and biosimilars, herbal and traditional medicines manufactured from domestic herbal ingredients, and drugs manufactured in domestic facilities meeting good manufacturing practice standards.

Moreover, the new law reflects a preferential treatment for domestically produced drugs over imported drugs that first appeared in the Law on Procurement. That is, when domestically produced drugs are available that satisfy the Ministry of Health’s requirements on medical treatment, price, and supply, the dossier for a drug tender must stipulate that tenderers are not allowed to offer imported drugs. As a result of those regulations, there are more foreign pharmaceutical companies considering the option of going “local.”

Summary

The new Law on Pharmacy represents a milestone achievement in healthcare in Vietnam and is likely to have a major impact on patients and pharmaceutical companies, with the key benefit for consumers being earlier access to pharmaceutical products, due to the removal of the clinical trial requirement. As the new Law on Pharmacy is of critical importance, the government will likely issue a large number of decrees and circulars that will guide the implementation of the new law when it takes effect next year.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More