You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 17, 2023

Vietnam: Draft Circulars Set Out Rating Systems for Film and Non-Film Content

Subscribe to Updates

Since the issuance last October of Decree No. 71/2022/ND-CP (“Decree 71”), the differentiation of film vs. non-film content has become increasingly important for pay-TV service providers in Vietnam, because they are subject to completely different licensing requirements. With the effectiveness of Decree 71 on January 1, 2023, overseas providers of over-the-top (OTT) pay-TV services, including video on demand (VOD) content, to Vietnamese users are subject to licensing requirements and the establishment of a local presence in Vietnam. Meanwhile, the new Cinema Law promulgated on June 15, 2022, and its guiding Decree No. 131/2022/ND-CP dated December 31, 2022—both of which also took effect on January 1, 2023—do not impose any licensing requirements on film disseminators.

Although there are ambiguities in Decree 71’s wording, the Ministry of Information and Communication (MIC) and the Authority for Broadcasting and Electronic Information (ABEI) under the MIC have confirmed orally in a closed industry meeting, without written confirmation, that for VOD film-only content, OTT pay-TV service providers are exempted from the licensing requirements of Decree 71 and are instead subject to regulations of the Cinema Law. This is why film vs. non-film content has become critical in shaping the business models of overseas pay-TV service providers.

In this article, we provide an overview of the current regulations and draft regulations with regard to the classification/rating of film content under the regulations of the Cinema Law and its sub-laws, and the classification/rating of non-film content under the regulations of Decree 71.

 

Film Classification/Rating

Under the Cinema Law, “films” are defined to include feature films, documentaries, cartoons, and films of combined genres. The law explicitly provides that “films” do not include recorded products for disseminating news, art shows, video games, recorded products that show the activities of one or more people and describe events and situations, or reality shows. These exclusions could be interpreted to be “non-film” content.

Starting from January 1, 2023, in respect of film dissemination in cyberspace (notably including the streaming of films in the form of OTT TV services), onshore and offshore film disseminators are permitted to self-rate their films according to the government’s regulations before disseminating them in cyberspace, and they must display film ratings and warnings according to the regulations of the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MOCST). However, if (i) the disseminators do not meet the conditions for self-rating of the films set out by law and (ii) such films have not yet been granted a Film Classification License or a Broadcast Decision (as the case may be), the film disseminators must request the MOCST or its authorized agency to rate the films for them.

Decree 131 provides the set of conditions for a film disseminator to perform the mandatory self-rating of films to be disseminated in cyberspace, which include:

  • Having a film rating council or technical software or a mechanism to rate the films according to Vietnamese regulations on film rating and taking responsibility for the results of the film rating;
  • Having a plan to amend and update film rating results at the request of the cinematography authority (for most providers, this is the Cinematography Department under the MOCST);
  • Having an administrative tool to support the rating of films according to each of the rating criteria and to flexibly display the updated rating immediately after the rating is changed; and
  • Having a technical plan and process for suspending and removing films at the request of the cinematography authority. Upon a request for removal of the film, the disseminator must proceed to implement the removal functionality available on the administrative tool.

In addition, Decree 131 also provides for the formality requirements for an online film disseminator to request recognition from the MOCST that they meet the self-rating conditions, as well as the procedures for the MOCST to receive and handle the dossier.

With regard to age rating, from January 1, 2023, the Cinema Law prescribes the following new categories for films:

  • P rated: Eligible for dissemination to viewers of all ages.
  • K rated: Eligible for dissemination to viewers under 13 years old, provided that they are with their parents or guardians.
  • T13 rated (13+): Eligible for dissemination to viewers from 13 years old or older.
  • T16 rated (16+): Eligible for dissemination to viewers from 16 years old or older.
  • T18 rated (18+): Eligible for dissemination to viewers from 18 years old or older.
  • C rated: Prohibited from dissemination.

Apart from age ratings, online film disseminators (OTT TV service providers) are also required to display rating descriptors and warnings. The requirements are provided in a draft circular of the MOCST on film rating criteria and instructions for displaying age ratings and rating descriptors that was issued for public comments on September 21, 2022 (“Draft Circular on Film Ratings”). The Vietnamese version of this Draft can be accessed here and its Appendix can be accessed here.

According to the Draft Circular on Film Ratings, the rating descriptors on OTT TV platforms must appear on a black stripe displayed on the screens before the film starts; while the rating must be clearly and prominently displayed before the film starts and must keep appearing in the left corner of the screen during the entire streaming period. For example, the rating and rating descriptor for T18 films (films that are allowed to be disseminated to viewers aged 18 and over) should be displayed as: “T18: Strong violence, sex, language, drug abuse.” Rating descriptors are mandatory for films rated T13, T16, and T18; for films rated below T13, these descriptors are not mandatory, but are recommended.

 

Non-Film VOD Classification/Rating

Currently, under Decree 71, there are only regulations on the rating of sports and entertainment programs, which are subject to being self-edited and self-rated by the licensed OTT service providers before being provided on OTT services, and must display warnings throughout the process of provision of services in order to ensure that the programs do not commit violations of the law.

Detailed proposed regulations for the rating of these sports and entertainment programs have been provided in a Draft Circular on Non-Film VOD Content Rating (“Draft Circular on Non-Film Ratings”), the Vietnamese version of which was posted on the MIC website for public consultation from February 27 to April 27, 2023, and can be accessed here.

Under the Draft Circular on Non-Film Ratings, the age ratings for entertainment programs are similar to those for films under the Cinema Law as mentioned above (i.e., P, K, T13, T16, T17, C), with further details provided in an appendix.

The ratings for entertainment programs are based on factors including topic and content; violence; nudity and sex; drugs, stimulants and addictive substances; horror; vulgar images, sounds, and language; and dangerous behavior that is easy to imitate.

In general, entertainment programs are to be rated in consideration of the manner of expression; specific situations and contexts; interactivity; frequency; duration; level of detail of images, sound, lighting, and dialogue; and the level of impact of the program on viewers and listeners, in which the importance of the context and the level of impact on viewers and listeners are priority factors in rating the program.

Entertainment programs are rated at a lower level (e.g., P, K, T13) when:

  • The program content is depicted verbally rather than visually; and
  • The images and words of the program have a low impact on viewers/listeners.

Entertainment programs are rated at a more stringent level (e.g., T18, C) when the program content:

  • Contains more details, including close-ups and slow motion;
  • Uses highlighting techniques such as lighting, perspective, and resolution;
  • Uses special effects such as light, sound, noise, resolution, color, image size, characteristics, and tones;
  • Is realistic instead of stylized; and
  • Encourages interaction.

The principles for displaying the rating descriptor of entertainment programs include:

  • The rating must be displayed clearly and prominently in the program introduction/display folder on the device’s screen interface so that listeners and viewers can make a decision to listen to or watch the program provided on the service.
  • For TV programs and audiovisual programs: The rating must continuously appear in the upper left or right corner of the screen during the program broadcast, ensuring that it does not overlap with the service icons or other icons.
  • For radio programs and audio-only programs: There is no need to display the rating during the program broadcast.

 

Warnings for Non-Film Content

The Draft Circular on Non-Film Ratings also provides principles for displaying warnings, as follows:

  • For entertainment programs classified from K to T18 and sports programs in extreme sports, combat sports, and martial arts: Warnings must be displayed.
  • For entertainment programs that are reality TV shows; art performances; TV talent contests; exhibitions of risky and dangerous acts, with the risk of causing injury; or fictional TV shows based on real-life events: There must be warning content addressing that viewers should not imitate and follow the acts in these programs. In these programs, there must be warning text at the bottom of the screen during the program.
  • C-rated programs are not allowed to be provided on the service.

The display of a warning must be done before and during the broadcast of the program using one or more appropriate methods, including but not limited to verbal or written warnings, such as:

  • For TV programs and audiovisual programs: Display/play a written or verbal warning at least three seconds before the broadcast, right below the rating icon for entertainment programs; display the warning up to three times during program broadcast for programs with a duration of 15 minutes or more.
  • For radio programs and audio-only programs: Play a verbal warning at least three seconds before broadcasting the program.

 

Outlook

Because VOD OTT TV service providers, under the Cinema Law and Decree 71, can now self-rate films and non-film content, it is important that they know how this rating is regulated in order to fully comply with Vietnamese law before providing VOD OTT TV services to Vietnamese users.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
Read More
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
Read More
August 10, 2026
On July 31, 2026, Thailand’s Big Data Institute (BDI) launched a public consultation on the principles of a proposed new data-sharing law, with comments accepted until August 31, 2026. If enacted, the law would establish Thailand’s first comprehensive framework for government and private-sector data sharing, creating a systematic, secure, and transparent regime to support analytics, policymaking, research, and innovation. Central Data-Sharing Platform The draft law establishes a central system for data sharing, managed by the BDI. Government agencies would be required to connect to the BDI’s Data Integration and Intelligence Platform (also referred to as D2), in accordance with the BDI’s rules and procedures. Five Dimensions of Data Sharing The draft law covers five key types of data sharing between government (G), businesses (B), and consumers (C): G2B: Private organizations may request government data specifically for research and development purposes. The BDI will assess the applicant’s data governance, security, and privacy capabilities whether such measures meet prescribed standards before forwarding the request to the relevant government agency within 90 days. Any dispute may be escalated to a newly established Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for final determination. G2G: Government agencies may request data from other agencies through the central system. The data-holding agency must respond within 90 days, taking legality, necessity, proportionality, public interest, and personal data protection into account. Disputes may be referred to the Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for adjudication. B2G: In emergency situations involving public safety, economic security, or disaster response, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society may require private entities to provide data through the central data-sharing system. Government agencies must specify the data requested, demonstrate its necessity and expected benefits, and request only data reasonably available to the data holder. Requests for personal data must be limited to the minimum amount necessary. B2C: Royal decrees may
Read More
August 10, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) recently released draft guidance on records of processing activities (ROPA) for personal data controllers and processors under the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA). The draft guidance, which was presented to the public on July 7, 2026, addresses both controller records of collection, use, and disclosure of personal data and processor records of processing activities carried out on behalf of controllers. If implemented, the guidance will significantly expand organizational expectations for ROPA preparation, maintenance, and use across all sectors. Key Takeaways The draft guidance contains several important implications for organizations subject to the PDPA: ROPA reframed as a core accountability tool. The guidance elevates ROPA from an administrative record to a central accountability mechanism, connecting controller duties with recordkeeping obligations. ROPA as a source for privacy notices and governance documents. ROPA should serve as the primary source for privacy notices and align with consent management, retention schedules, DPIAs, incident response plans, and vendor contracts. Expanded scope across all activities. ROPA must cover all processing activities across the organization—including security, finance, HR, and external contractors—with correct controller or processor classification for each. Ongoing maintenance and auditability. ROPA must be updated for any change to systems, purposes, or processors, reviewed at least annually, and maintained with version control and a designated owner. Enhanced vendor, processor, and cross-border transfer requirements. Organizations must document all processors, external recipients, and cross-border transfers, specifying purposes, access scope, and destination countries. Linkage with risk assessment, DPIAs, and LIAs. ROPA should assign risk levels to each activity and identify when data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) or legitimate interests assessments (LIAs) are required, functioning as a risk-management tool. ROPA and data breach readiness. Incomplete ROPA can delay breach response and notification. Organizations should map data flows, vendors,
Read More