You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 19, 2017

Technological Disruptions in the Insurance Industry

T-AB: Thai-American Business, Journal of the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand

“InsurTech” is a term that people may not be able to find a definition for, even in modern dictionaries. There is no Thai translation of it, or for its sister term “FinTech.” The popular opinion is that the term InsurTech was inspired by FinTech, and it should generally be used to refer to the use of technological innovation which enhances the economic efficiency of the insurance industry.

If InsurTech’s primary goal is to drive efficiency through the use of technology, thus creating a cheaper model for conducting insurance business, the traditional way of carrying out insurance business will need to evolve in order to absorb these new technological innovations, or risk becoming obsolete.

There are a wide range of InsurTech models, especially in more developed markets such as the U.S. and some European countries. In the Asia Pacific region—especially Southeast Asia—InsurTech startups are fast entering the market and beginning to grow rapidly. The Thai insurance market is steadily growing with strong upside potential in the penetration rate, which is complimented by the national “Thailand 4.0” policy of digitally transforming the country. These factors fuel the interest in how InsurTech will transform the country’s insurance industry.

InsurTech Tools

Aggregators, comparison tools, and marketplaces are a few types of InsurTech that are already prevalent in Thailand, and which have altered typical insurance market practices. Thailand has already seen the emergence of a number of international and local online aggregators, such as Easy Compare and gobear.com. The aggregator concept is simple: cut out the middle man by allowing customers to quickly compare insurance products (car insurance being the most common in Thailand) with a few clicks. To use an aggregator website, the user merely has to input their requirements and information. The aggregator will then analyze them to provide product quotations in a way that makes it possible to easily see and compare premium rates, summarized coverage, and exclusions. The process can be completed instantly by making an online payment, and the insurance policy will then be emailed to the customer.

Although the process sounds very simple, it significantly impacts the industry by changing customer behavior. With all the compared products easily visible, customers will focus heavily on the premium rates and will usually purchase the cheapest product that provides their required coverage. Consequently, insurers will need to offer their products at the lowest possible margin if they are to be selected. In other words, aggregators drive down prices and increase efficiency. These insurance intermediaries and online platforms will surely become one of the most important distribution channels, to the detriment of bancassurance or agents/broker.

A more sophisticated InsurTech business structure exists in the UK, where an interesting InsurTech innovation called “Spixii” has been developed. The concept behind Spixii is also simple: a chatbot for insurance. It claims to be an “automated insurance agent” that will eventually allow you to make enquiries, buy insurance, and even manage your policy through a chatbot. Although still in a beta version, the full version of Spixii is expected to allow customers to enquire about anything concerning insurance, and its AI technology will automate the response and give customers the correct answers and solutions. If this InsurTech chatbot becomes the new automated insurance agent in the future, what will become of traditional agents?

Technology for Insurers

Transformations to the market will not be limited to distribution channels. For example, another type of InsurTech known as “telematics” could change the concept of underwriting insurance. Telematics involve the use of devices which track data relevant to underwriters, for example in the form of a wearable device that keeps track of your health habits (and your location), or a small black box hidden in your car to capture data relating to usage and driving behavior. These technologies will allow the insurer to analyze individual behavior, in order to personalize tailor-made insurance that fits a customer’s personal risks.

A health telematic device can capture your health statistics, exercise habits, or even locate your travel habits, which could enable an insurer to offer a combination of health, travel and life insurance in a single, bundled, tailor-made policy. This means the expenses pertaining to insurance risks can be focused on the areas that are most needed. Ultimately, with this telematic technology, and the “internet of things” revolution, it will be possible to see increasingly more tailor-made products until insurance eventually becomes simply another utility, like water or electricity, for which customers only pay for what they use.

Peer-to-Peer Insurance Platforms

InsurTech also offers solutions for people who have lost confidence in the concept of insurance. Some people believe that when companies keep all the premiums as their own capital, and only pay a fraction when claims are successfully made, then technically, these people believe that if the money is safely in the pockets of insurers, there is an incentive for them not to pay, or to slowly make payments, or to pay insufficient amounts. InsurTech however allows for the concept of a peer-to-peer (P2P) insurance platforms that people contribute to pooled funds are generally paid back if there are no claims. This allows participants to share the risk of an accident/damage with other people in a manner in which the facilitator, which is the insurance company, will only earn a service fee when it processes the P2P transactions.

One of the successful U.S.-based P2P InsurTech companies is Lemonade, which allows each participant to pay a fee into a pooling fund. If no claims, the funds will be given back to a charity of the participant’s choice. Lemonade only charges the facilitation fee, and offers a “fast, affordable and hassle-free insurance experience.” It offers zero paperwork and instantly provides all services relating to buying and claiming insurance through the Lemonade app, which claims it takes “90 seconds to get insured and just three minutes to get paid.”

In Thailand, to date, the InsurTech era is not far-reaching. “Claim Di,” which originated in Bangkok, is a networked claims process InsurTech service that enables car drivers involved in a car accident to submit real-time claims directly to the insurer, using handheld devices to capture photos or videos and then upload them through the application platform. This networked claims process InsurTech reflects the same concept (i.e., driving efficiency). In a heavy-traffic environment such as Bangkok, it offers a much more pleasant process for drivers than having to call a contact center and wait 30 minutes before communicating with the agent, then submit their claims through “surveyors,” and later still have to wait until their transactions are completed at a later stage. In contrast, the transaction time could be reduced to less than 10 to 15 minutes by using the networked InsurTech claims process. Therefore, customer experience, when transacting using these types of InsurTech claims, will be substantially and positively changed.

Regulatory Environment

In theory, InsurTech concepts sound constructive, positive, and promising for customers. However, the question remains as to how Thailand will further open up and embrace InsurTech. With the government’s Thailand 4.0 project aiming to digitally transform the country, would Thailand be the right forum for an InsurTech revolution? If Thailand hypothetically changed immediately and dramatically, would consumers be ready for this evolution, and what would the collateral damage of such a change be? As these elements remain unclear, they may represent the unforeseen cons of introducing InsurTech in Thailand.

The Thai insurance industry, as in other countries, is heavily-regulated by the government. As insurance businesses have a wide-scale public impact, without proper controls, and with bad governance, they would be unsustainable, and the industry would not be able to provide adequate risk management tools to cover losses, especially for losses on a catastrophic scale, such as tsunamis or the 2011 mega flooding in Thailand.

InsurTech businesses are not yet widespread in Thailand, as the new InsurTech business models do not easily fit in with the current regulatory environment. However, it is visible that current, modern types of regulatory bodies do not move at an old fashioned, slow pace. In 2017, we saw the launch of a regulatory sandbox; a significant amount of new legislation aimed at supervising and regulating the relatively new concept of online business, e-insurance, and the evolution of InsurTech. However, the regulatory changes may not come quickly enough to permit more sophisticated InsurTech businesses to appear in Thailand in the immediate future.

It is not realistic to expect regulatory requirements for the insurance industry to be fully lifted in the near future to freely allow new InsurTech startups to conduct insurance related business in Thailand without controls. However, the regulatory bodies should take the opportunity to use their supervisory authority to free up regulatory barriers in the focused businesses that fit with Thailand. The hope is that the regulatory sandbox will be utilized efficiently to intensively screen, and promote InsurTech companies with new innovations, which have a low disruptive impact, in order to enable them to enter the market quickly and the sandbox is also utilized to capture the anticipated high impact InsurTech players, so that their business models can be analyzed and fully assessed. This would, in turn, enable the market entry process to be formulated into stages, so that the industry can evolve at the right pace to be most beneficial to both customers and business players in the market.

Eventually, the Thai insurance industry will be transformed by the InsurTech revolution. When people start to execute all their transactions through online platforms, insurance transactions can no longer be undertaken in the traditional way. Whether insurers, intermediaries, or even customers are ready for the transformation or not, the InsurTech revolution will impact all of us. We are now entering a new era where technology companies are conducting insurance business too, instead of just the same group of old-style players. Inevitably in such an environment, those business players that are not prepared to develop with these changes will unavoidably be forced out of the market.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 10, 2026
Vietnam has taken a significant step in regulating its e-commerce sector with the issuance of a new decree guiding the country’s recently enacted Law on E-Commerce. Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP, issued on June 30, 2026, and taking effect the following day, addresses mandatory platform policies, registration requirements for offshore platforms, additional obligations on platform operators, and market access conditions for foreign investors. Mandatory Policy Contents The decree sets out detailed guidance on the required contents of various platform policies, covering pricing, payment, display priority, livestream sales, delivery, returns, method of service provision, and service termination and refunds. Clarification of Obligations for Platform Operators The decree provides clarification of the obligations applicable to platform operators. Notably, intermediary e-commerce platform operators with online ordering functions must: Collect specific information to implement electronic identity verification of sellers; Cooperate with regulators by reporting online through the state e-commerce management system and by blocking, suspending, or removing content upon request of a competent authority; Maintain a mechanism to store contract data, including price, product or service information, and parties’ information, for at least three years from the date of contract conclusion; and If qualifying as a “large digital platform” under consumer protection law, maintain an online system for receiving and handling complaints and requests, and comply with enhanced content-removal requirements. Registration Requirements for Offshore Platforms Offshore e-commerce platforms, whether direct-sales, intermediary, social-network-based, or integrated, that conduct e-commerce activity in Vietnam must register with the Ministry of Industry and Trade if the platform: Allows Vietnamese-language selection; Uses a “.vn” domain; or Reaches 100,000 or more transactions with Vietnam-based buyers within a calendar year. Notably, the registration requirement now captures not only traditional intermediary platforms, but also direct-sales platforms. Foreign Investment Conditions Foreign investors holding a controlling interest in an intermediary e-commerce platform, a social media platform
July 8, 2026
On July 7, 2026, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) issued a press release announcing the establishment of two new subcommittees designed to intensify oversight of digital platforms and modern trade businesses. The formation of the digital platform subcommittee marks a significant escalation in competition enforcement following the TCCT’s Guidelines on Multi-Sided Platforms and E-Commerce Businesses, which took effect on March 25, 2026. Platform operators, sellers, and related service providers should expect heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential investigations into practices already flagged under the March guidelines. Two Dedicated Enforcement Bodies The first new body is the digital platform subcommittee—formally the Subcommittee on Supervision, Monitoring, and Prevention of Trade Conduct in Digital Platform Business. It is tasked with driving intensive oversight of digital platform businesses. It will coordinate with government agencies, the private sector, business operators, and other relevant stakeholders to supervise and prevent trade conduct that may affect competition, and to promote free and fair competition in the digital platform sector. The subcommittee will be composed of TCCT members and representatives from the Department of Internal Trade. The second body—the Subcommittee on Determining Guidelines and Action Plans Concerning Competition Conditions in Modern Wholesale and Retail Business—will study, analyze, and monitor market structure in modern wholesale and retail businesses, compile databases to analyze retail business concentration, assess impacts on small-scale operators, and propose supervisory measures for the retail sector. TCCT members will serve on the subcommittee alongside experts from government and private organizations, including the Office of Industrial Economics, the Office of Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion, the Thai SME Federation, and the Thai SME Council. Operational Impact for Industry Participants These subcommittees provide the TCCT with a focused mechanism to investigate various trade practices deemed unfair, and the TCCT has authority under the Trade Competition Act to issue cease-and-desist
July 6, 2026
Vietnam has introduced an official list of high-risk AI systems, triggering more stringent compliance obligations for developers, suppliers, and deployers operating in the country. On June 30, 2026, the prime minister issued Decision No. 33/2026/QD-TTg (Decision 33), which establishes the List of High-Risk AI Systems under the Law on Artificial Intelligence (AI Law) and Decree No. 142/2026/ND-CP (Decree 142). Decision 33 takes effect on August 15, 2026. Decision 33 is significant because only AI systems included on the list will be subject to the heightened compliance obligations applicable to high-risk AI systems under the AI Law and Decree 142. These include, among others, local presence requirements for foreign providers, mandatory conformity assessment before deployment, comprehensive risk management and data quality documentation, and strict liability for damages even when the provider is fully compliant. Decision 33 also specifies the applicable conformity assessment pathway for each listed system, indicating whether the system must undergo mandatory third-party conformity certification before being placed into use, or whether the provider may self-assess conformity or voluntarily engage a registered or recognized conformity assessment body. Which AI Systems Are Covered? Decision 33 identifies high-risk AI systems across six sectors—the key attributes of which are summarized below. Education: AI systems used for automated assessment, learner ranking, behavioral monitoring, or generating educational content from uncontrolled data sources. Ethnic affairs and religion: AI systems used to automatically score, classify, or rank applications for government ethnic policies; approve or reject regulatory applications; suspend benefits on suspicion of fraud; allocate budgets; or infer and classify individuals by ethnicity or religion for administrative purposes. Healthcare: AI-assisted surgical systems and autonomous AI-powered surgical robots. Banking: AI systems that autonomously conduct electronic banking transactions or make credit approval decisions. Judicial proceedings: Certain large-scale biometric identification systems used in public-interest civil proceedings. Transport: Thirty-one categories
July 6, 2026
Indonesia’s regulation on reporting online intellectual property (IP) infringement provides comprehensive procedural guidance for IP rights holders and their licensees in reporting online infringement complaints. Issued in December 2025 by the Ministry of Law as Regulation No. 47 of 2025 regarding Handling of Intellectual Property Infringement Reports in Electronic Systems, this regulation covers all types of IP rights. It also specifies documentation when reporting infringement, and lays out the procedures for examination, verification, and enforcement actions. Submission of Complaints Complainants may submit reports through the online system of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) or in person at the DGIP office. Complaints may also be filed through an authorized proxy. Under the regulation, complainants are required to provide the following information and documents: Personal details of the complainant; Brief description of the protected work or subject matter (i.e., type of IP and name or address of the infringing website, portal, account, or application, or a link to the location of the infringing content); Complete description of the alleged infringement; Certificate of registration or recordal of the relevant IP; Recordal of IP license agreement, if any; and Other supporting evidence. Verification and Examination Process Upon receiving a complaint, the responsible formality officer may request clarification or additional supporting documents. In the latter case, the complainant must then submit the necessary administrative documents within 14 days of the notification date. Once the documentation is deemed complete and sufficient, the case will be formally registered. Subsequently, the DGIP will establish a verification team to handle online IP violations, which will include the Civil Servant Investigator (PPNS), the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs, experts with relevant expertise in IP, and representatives from related associations such as AVISI (Indonesian Video Streaming Association). After examining the report, the team will prepare the Minutes