You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 23, 2017

The New Customs Act: Important Changes for Importers and Exporters

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

The Thai Customs Act was enacted in 1926, and has undergone several changes during the past nine decades of its existence. Despite the amendments, however, some provisions in the Act continued to pose problems for importers, exporters, and business operators.

In an effort to address these problems, the government has enacted a new Customs Act B.E. 2560 (2017). The Act was published in the Royal Gazette  on May 17, 2017, and will become effective 180 days from the publication date. This article describes some of the Act’s key points that will impact business operators, importers, and exporters.

Time Limits for Duty Evaluation

Customs officers are entitled to evaluate duty under the Act and the Customs tariff law within three years from the date of submission of an import or export entry clearance form. In situations where the customs officer cannot make an evaluation within the allotted time period, the Director-General of the Customs Department is entitled to extend the deadline by a maximum of two years. If the director has evidence to believe that the duty payer intended to avoid paying the duty, the customs officer has an additional five years to evaluate the duty.

The main reason for limiting the time frame for evaluation is that companies have experienced problems when customs officers evaluated duties too far back in time. In such cases, companies often did not possess required documents, as they had been either lost or destroyed. It is hoped that this problem will be resolved with the introduction of the new time limits.

Reduced Penalties

Under the Act, some offenses—such as importing or exporting goods with the intent to avoid paying duty—can result in a maximum imprisonment of 10 years, and a fine from one-half to four times the amount of the duty evaded, or both. The court is entitled to seize the goods even if there is no person to be punished under its judgment. These penalties under the new Act are generally lower than those under the old law.

Change of Presumed Liability

The old Act contained strict liability for directors and officers, unless they were able to prove that they were not involved in the offense, admitted to the offense, or acted reasonably to prevent the offense. The new Act changes this principle.

Under the new law, if the offender is a juristic person, and if the offense occurred due to the order or act of any director, manager, or person responsible for business operations, that person will face the same criminal penalties as the juristic person. Moreover, if the director, manager, or responsible person neglected their duty, which caused the juristic person to carry out an offense, the director or manager will also face the same criminal penalties as the juristic person.

Appeal Timelines

The Act states that the Board of Appeal, which is an internal appellate review panel within the Customs Department, has 180 days to perform its review, counting from the date on which the customs officer receives the appeal and a complete set of supporting documents. If the Board of Appeal does not finish reviewing the appeal within the specified deadline, the importer or exporter who submitted the appeal can submit a court claim.

In addition, if necessary, the Finance Minister is entitled to appoint an additional Board of Appeal or several Boards of Appeal.

Reduced Incentives and Rewards

A common complaint among business operators has been that the incentive and reward payments that customs officers were entitled to were too high under the old Act. This issue, companies argued, was an obstacle to doing business and served as a disincentive for imports and exports. The new Act seeks to address this concern by reducing incentive and reward amounts.

In addition, the Director-General of the Customs Department, with the Finance Minister’s approval, is entitled to deduct money from the sales price of seized goods, or deduct money from a fine if there are no seized goods or if the goods cannot be sold, and pay the deducted money as an incentive and a reward.

For some offenses, the deduction rate is 40 percent—20 percent as an incentive payment and 20 percent as a reward amount. More importantly, the new Act introduces a cap of THB 5 million on the incentive payment and a cap of THB 5 million on the reward payment.

Business operators should also be aware of changes to other important provisions in the new Act, including imposition of a clear deadline for return of duty guarantees. Lawmakers are hopeful that the new Customs Act will promote and facilitate import and export activities, and generally reduce obstacles when doing business in Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 15, 2026
On July 8, 2026, Thailand enacted a new law significantly expanding the framework for government service delivery and licensing facilitation. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Services Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Facilitation Act 2026) replaces and expands the framework of governmental services under the Facilitation of Official Licensing Consideration Act B.E. 2558 (2015) (Facilitation Act 2015) and broadens its scope to cover public services, administrative processes, and public benefits. The Facilitation Act 2026 aims to modernize government services by promoting e-filing, reducing administrative burdens and repeated document requests, and improving predictability. For businesses, this should ease compliance and shorten approval timelines, subject to implementing regulations and agency readiness. Public Services Facilitation Scope The Facilitation Act 2015 applied mainly to permissions, registrations, and notifications required before conducting activities that require licenses, certificates, permits, approvals, or registrations. The Facilitation Act 2026 broadens this framework to include public services and other benefits, such as welfare, subsidies, and grants, provided to Thai citizens, expanding government agencies’ responsibilities beyond licensing facilitation into a wider administrative-service framework. It also introduces a broader definition of “government agency” to include central, regional, and local government bodies, state enterprises, public organizations, and other state entities. Licensing Changes The Facilitation Act 2026 introduces a “super license” (termed a “main license” under the act) that exempts the holder from obtaining multiple related or ancillary licenses issued by different government agencies. Obtaining a super license deems the licensee to have automatically obtained the related “sublicenses” required to conduct the relevant activities. The cabinet will designate eligible activities by royal decree. The act also introduces an expedited licensing option, allowing applicants to pay an additional fee to fast-track their applications in urgent cases. Expedited processing must not interfere with standard application timelines. The criteria, procedures, conditions, and fees for expedited licensing
July 10, 2026
Vietnam has taken a significant step in regulating its e-commerce sector with the issuance of a new decree guiding the country’s recently enacted Law on E-Commerce. Decree No. 248/2026/ND-CP, issued on June 30, 2026, and taking effect the following day, addresses mandatory platform policies, registration requirements for offshore platforms, additional obligations on platform operators, and market access conditions for foreign investors. Mandatory Policy Contents The decree sets out detailed guidance on the required contents of various platform policies, covering pricing, payment, display priority, livestream sales, delivery, returns, method of service provision, and service termination and refunds. Clarification of Obligations for Platform Operators The decree provides clarification of the obligations applicable to platform operators. Notably, intermediary e-commerce platform operators with online ordering functions must: Collect specific information to implement electronic identity verification of sellers; Cooperate with regulators by reporting online through the state e-commerce management system and by blocking, suspending, or removing content upon request of a competent authority; Maintain a mechanism to store contract data, including price, product or service information, and parties’ information, for at least three years from the date of contract conclusion; and If qualifying as a “large digital platform” under consumer protection law, maintain an online system for receiving and handling complaints and requests, and comply with enhanced content-removal requirements. Registration Requirements for Offshore Platforms Offshore e-commerce platforms, whether direct-sales, intermediary, social-network-based, or integrated, that conduct e-commerce activity in Vietnam must register with the Ministry of Industry and Trade if the platform: Allows Vietnamese-language selection; Uses a “.vn” domain; or Reaches 100,000 or more transactions with Vietnam-based buyers within a calendar year. Notably, the registration requirement now captures not only traditional intermediary platforms, but also direct-sales platforms. Foreign Investment Conditions Foreign investors holding a controlling interest in an intermediary e-commerce platform, a social media platform
June 29, 2026
Thailand’s cabinet has approved the draft Act on Liability for Defective Goods, commonly called Thailand’s “Lemon Law.” The Draft Act is currently pending consideration by Parliament. The draft law aims to strengthen buyers’ position in pursuing cases against sellers. While the Civil and Commercial Code offers provisions governing liability for defective goods, it is difficult in practice for buyers to successfully make a claim against sellers, particularly where defects are latent and not discoverable at the time of sale or delivery. By introducing product-specific rules and clearer remedies, the new law is intended to modernize Thailand’s consumer protection framework and align it more closely with international standards, and to help relieve the buyer’s burden of proof against the seller in product liability cases. If enacted, the draft act will take effect 180 days after publication in the Government Gazette, giving businesses a transition period to assess their compliance obligations. This article provides an overview of the key provisions of the draft act and highlights some practical considerations for businesses operating in Thailand. Scope and Key Definitions The draft act applies to sellers—defined as persons who sell goods in the ordinary course of business—and protects buyers, a term defined broadly to include not just the original purchaser but also transferees and successors in title. This expands the class of people who can bring claims. The law does not apply to used goods, live animals, or goods exempted by future ministerial regulation. It also leaves intact any separate warranties, promises, advertisements, or other guarantees a seller has given; those remain enforceable alongside the new statutory rights. General Liability for Defective Goods Sellers are liable for defects that exist at the time of delivery, regardless of whether the seller knew about them. Liability arises where a defect reduces: The benefit intended under
June 23, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has significantly revised its post-approval compliance framework for projects that receive investment promotion incentives, replacing the previous semiannual reporting system for project progress with a new quarterly reporting regime. The initial report is due by July 30, 2026, covering the second-quarter reporting period of April to June 2026. The new requirements—implemented through BOI Announcement No. 8/2569 and Office of the BOI Notification No. Por. 8/2569, both of which became effective on March 30, 2026—apply both to newly promoted projects and to existing promoted projects that remain in the implementation stage. Background Under the previous reporting framework, BOI-promoted companies that had not yet commenced full operations were generally required to submit reports on project progress to the BOI twice a year (February and July) through the BOI’s e-Monitoring system. By adopting a quarterly reporting regime, the BOI seeks to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of investment progress and project implementation. Reporting Requirements Under the new regulations, BOI-promoted companies must submit project progress reports on a quarterly basis during the implementation phase of a promoted project. The reporting periods and submission deadlines are: Q1 (January–March): April 30 Q2 (April–June): July 30 Q3 (July–September): October 30 Q4 (October–December): January 30 of the following year The quarterly reporting obligation runs from the date the BOI promotion certificate is issued until the BOI grants approval for commencement of full operations. For newly promoted projects, no quarterly report is required for the quarter in which the BOI promotion certificate is issued—the first reporting obligation arises in the immediately following reporting period. All project progress reports must be submitted electronically through the BOI’s e-Monitoring system. The existing annual reporting requirement also remains in effect, requiring promoted companies to submit an annual operating results report through the e-Monitoring system by July 31 of