You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 25, 2023

New Competition Regulations for Thailand’s Energy Sector

Thailand’s Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has issued four new regulations under the Energy Business Act B.E. 2550 (2007) setting forth competition regimes to control both anticompetitive conduct and market structure in the energy business sector. The regulations were published in the Government Gazette on December 19, 2022, and took effect the following day.

The key provisions of these ERC competition regulations largely mirror those articulated in the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) and its subordinate legislation. The most significant features of these competition regulations are summarized below.

Market Definition Regulation

The ERC’s market definition regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Market Definition and Relevant Market of Related Energy Services B.E. 2565) outlines the general framework for defining relevant markets in the energy sector. The factors to be taken into consideration include types of energy licenses, geographical areas, competition conditions, and interchangeability of energy services. In the annex to this regulation, the ERC has classified the relevant energy service markets as follows:

  • Power business activities include power generation, power transmission system services, power distribution system services, power distribution services, and power system control services.
  • Natural gas business activities include natural gas transmission through pipelines via natural gas transmission systems, natural gas procurement and wholesale via natural gas distribution systems, natural gas retail via natural gas distribution systems, and storage and regasification of liquefied natural gas.

The ERC will review its market definitions and relevant energy service markets from time to time, taking into account changes in technology and competition conditions as well as feedback from public hearings.

Market Dominance Regulation

Under the ERC’s market dominance regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Criteria on Business Operator having a Market Dominance B.E. 2565), the ERC is empowered to proactively determine and declare which license-holding energy business operators have a dominant position or significantly dominant position under its criteria, subject to public hearing and objections from the business operators concerned. The ERC can also request market data from business operators for these purposes. In addition, the ERC assumes authority to impose measures on business operators to prevent potential harm to competition or eliminate competition concerns.

Anticompetitive Conduct Regulation

The ERC’s anticompetitive conduct regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Rules and Measures on Monopoly, Reduction and Restriction on Competition in Energy Businesses B.E. 2565) aims to prevent license-holding energy business operators from unilaterally or jointly undertaking actions that may cause monopolization of—or reduction or restriction of competition in—energy service markets. However, the anticompetitive conduct regulation does not clarify or list examples of anticompetitive conduct; rather, the ERC will investigate and decide on a case-by-case basis regarding the conduct’s potential harm to competition and its effects in each relevant energy service market.

All energy business operators must notify the ERC immediately in the following cases:

  • They are aware of any conduct that may lead to monopolization or to reduction or restriction of competition;
  • They are harmed by anticompetitive conduct by other license holders; or
  • A license holder gains or may gain a dominant position in an energy service market.

An investigation and inquiry can be initiated with either a complaint from a license holder or by the ERC itself. The ERC has authority to impose specific remedies to suppress anticompetitive conduct, including cease-and-desist orders, administrative fines, orders to separate certain businesses’ accounting systems, obligation to disclose information to or notify the ERC, ERC determination of service prices or fees, and obligation to provide services to other license holders.

Merger and Cross-Shareholding Regulation

The ERC’s merger and cross-shareholding regulation (officially the ERC Regulation re: Rules and Procedures on Merger and Cross-Shareholding in Energy Businesses, B.E. 2565) repeals the previous merger control regulation for energy businesses and sets forth a new set of regimes to control mergers and acquisitions between two or more license holders in the energy industry. Under this regulation, “mergers” include mergers, amalgamation and acquisitions of assets, and direct and indirect acquisitions of shares as defined by the regulation. Cross-shareholding between license holders is also subject to control by the ERC.

  • Preapproval requirement: License holders that wish to proceed with a merger or cross-shareholding transaction must seek approval from the ERC at least 60 days in advance. Supporting documents that the concerned parties must submit include objectives and plan, market analysis, and an impact assessment report. In approving the merger, the ERC will reflect on potential harm to competition, the effect on the license holders’ contractual parties, and impact on stability of energy and public interests, as well as whether it is a merger with a failing company.
  • Pretransaction reporting requirement: Energy license holders only need to submit a premerger report (instead of a preapproval application) to the ERC if the license holder can prove that after the merger is completed, the total assets, revenue, or value of assets acquired from other license holders will not exceed the threshold prescribed by the regulation.

These requirements also apply to a merger by a license holder’s controlling entity, parent entity, subsidiary, or affiliate.

Implications

The announcement of these four new competition regulations by the ERC signals its intention to combat anticompetitive behaviors and market concentration. This also presages more stringent enforcement by the ERC to relieve competition concerns and ensure free and fair competition in the energy industry. License holders and business operators active in the relevant energy business markets should be prepared for stricter controls and more stringent duties to seek approval from, notify, or report to the ERC as a result of the triggering events prescribed in these ERC regulations.

For more information on internal competition compliance, or any aspect of the regulatory regime for energy businesses in Thailand, please contact Kobkit Thienpreecha at [email protected], Supasit Boonsanong at [email protected], Nutavit Sirikan at [email protected], or Kobchai Nitungkorn at [email protected].

Related Professionals

RELATED INSIGHTS​

July 24, 2024
Experts from Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property team have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam to Thomson Reuters Practical Law, a high-level comparative overview of  laws and regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Intellectual Property Transactions focuses on business-related aspects of intellectual property, such as the value of intellectual assets in M&A transactions, and the licensing of IP portfolios. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations. IP audits. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence, warranties/indemnities, and transfer of IPRs. Employee and consultant agreements. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Intellectual property specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Thailand have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview for Thomson Reuters Practical Law, an online publication that provides comprehensive legal guides for jurisdictions worldwide. The Thailand overview was authored by Darani Vachanavuttivong, managing partner of Tilleke & Gibbins and managing director of the firm’s regional IP practice; Titikaan Ungbhakorn, senior associate and patent agent; and San Chaithiraphant, senior associate. The chapter delivers a high-level examination of critical aspects of IP law, including IP assignment and licensing, research and development collaborations, IP in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), securing loans with intellectual property rights, settlement agreements, employee-related IP issues, competition law, taxation, and non-tariff trade barriers. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations: Management of improvements, derivatives, and joint ownership of IP. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence and critical considerations during mergers and acquisitions. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Acted as lead counsel for Nordic Transport Group A/S (NTG), an international freight forwarding company based in Denmark, in its acquisition of a stake in Asia-based Freightzen Logistics Ltd., Inc. through a newly established subsidiary, NTG APAC Holding Pte. Ltd.
July 23, 2024
In the Who’s Who Legal (WWL) Southeast Asia guide for 2024, a total of 12 Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers have been distinguished as market leaders in various legal practice areas. The firm’s 12 recognized lawyers, singled out for their commitment to delivering exceptional legal services to Tilleke & Gibbins’ clients, are grouped into seven practice areas: Asset Recovery: Thawat Damsa-ard Data: Alan Adcock, Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh Franchise: Alan Adcock, Jay Cohen Intellectual Property: Alan Adcock (Patents, Trademarks), Darani Vachanavuttivong (Patents, Trademarks), Kasama Sriwatanakul (Trademarks), Linh Thi Mai Nguyen (Trademarks), Somboon Earterasarun (Trademarks), Wongrat Ratanaprayul (Patents) Investigations: John Frangos and Thawat Damsa-ard Labor, Employment, and Benefits: Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut Life Sciences: Alan Adcock, Loc Xuan Le The annual WWL Southeast Asia rankings guide, published by the London-based group Law Business Research, aims to identify the foremost legal practitioners across a range of business law practice areas. The rankings are largely based on feedback and nominations received from other WWL-ranked and nominated attorneys around the world. These peer-driven recognitions highlight Tilleke & Gibbins’ dedication to maintaining the highest standards of legal service and helping clients achieve success. To read more about the WWL Southeast Asia guide, or to browse the full results, please visit the WWL website.