You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 6, 2022

How Franchise Businesses Should Respond to Thailand’s New Data Protection Law

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA) entered into force in full on June 1, 2022. The PDPA, which contains similarities to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) introduces obligations and restrictions relating to the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data in Thailand. While the new law applies to franchisors and franchisees in the same way that it applies to other businesses, there are a number of issues that are of specific importance in franchise businesses.

As franchisors and franchisees have the power and duty to make decisions concerning the collection, use, and disclosure of customers’ and employees’ personal data in the course of their operations, they are considered “data controllers” under the PDPA. The Trade Competition Commission of Thailand, via its Notification on the Guidelines for the Consideration of Unfair Trade Practices in Franchise Businesses issued under the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017), defines a franchise relationship as one which, among others, involves an element of control by the franchisor over the business operations of the franchisee. It follows then that in some situations, franchisees’ collection, use, and disclosure of personal data will be according to the instructions of their franchisors. In such circumstances, a franchisee will be considered a “data processor” under the PDPA.

Whether acting as data controllers or data processors, franchisors and franchisees must nonetheless comply with the requirements of the PDPA in the course of their operations. To ensure their activities are in compliance with the law, franchise businesses should consider five major actions:

1. Auditing existing data collection and retention practices

Whether operating online or via a brick and mortar shop, it is increasingly common for franchise businesses to store and process customers’ personal data. This may include the storage and transmission of credit card information for auto-billing systems, or the collection of customers’ names, addresses, birthdays, and shopping preferences for loyalty programs. From the use of facial recognition technology and other biometric identifiers to access coworking spaces, to the collection of health and genetic data by fitness centers, the collection and use of sensitive personal data is now commonplace as businesses strive to improve customer experiences through personalization.

Under the PDPA, the collection of such sensitive personal data requires explicit consent from the data subjects. Franchisors and franchisees must evaluate their existing data collection practices to identify compliance gaps. For example, apart from consent requirements, the PDPA requires the collection of personal data to be limited to the extent necessary in relation to the lawful purposes of the data controller. Data controllers are also required to ensure that any personal data collected remains accurate, up-to-date, and complete, and that it is not misleading.

The PDPA allows businesses to continue using personal data collected prior to June 1, 2022, for the original purposes of its collection. However, the businesses must also provide and publish a consent withdrawal method for data subjects to opt out from the data controller’s continued collection and use of their personal data.

2. Developing PDPA-compliant policies and systems

Compliance with the PDPA goes beyond appointment of data protection officers and use of privacy notices and consent forms. Apart from putting in place a PDPA-compliant privacy policy, it is also vital for franchisors and franchisees to review existing arrangements with third-party service providers in Thailand, including any outsourced service providers, suppliers, and advertising agencies. This serves to ensure that any data processing activities carried out by third parties that may collect, use, and disclose customers’ personal data pursuant to the franchisor’s or franchisee’s instructions are in compliance with the PDPA.

As data controllers, franchise businesses are required by the PDPA to establish proper internal systems to delete or destroy collected personal data upon the end of the retention period or when the personal data collected is no longer relevant or exceeds the scope of necessity, or when requested by the data subject. Franchise businesses must also establish a system to notify and handle data breach incidents. Under the PDPA, data controllers must notify the Personal Data Protection Committee of data breach incidents without delay, with a statutory notification window of 72 hours from the time of becoming aware of the incident. In the event of a data breach incident that has a high risk of affecting the personal rights and liberties of data subjects, a franchise business as a data controller must also notify affected customers of the incident and the remedial measures taken to address it.

The PDPA also requires data controllers and data processors to adopt appropriate security measures to prevent loss of and unauthorized or unlawful access to personal data. In this regard, franchise businesses may wish to consider investing in relevant software and technology to facilitate compliance with the PDPA. However, it is important that the use of any third party software and technology not conflict with restrictions in existing master franchise agreements.

3. Ensuring compliance by franchisors based overseas

Master franchisees often have a contractual duty to keep their franchisors informed of significant legal developments impacting the franchise business in the franchise territory. Master franchisees and their overseas franchisors should note that due to the extraterritorial application of the PDPA, overseas franchisors will similarly need to comply with the PDPA in their provision of goods or services to data subjects, and in their activities related to the monitoring of the behavior of data subjects based in Thailand.

Furthermore, the PDPA requires data controllers based outside of Thailand, such as overseas franchisors, to appoint and authorize a representative physically based in Thailand to act on their behalf in relation to all matters concerning the collection, use, and disclosure of personal data under the PDPA.

The PDPA also imposes restrictions on transfers of personal data outside of Thailand. When transferring personal data overseas, the PDPA requires the relevant destination country or organization that receives the personal data, such as of the foreign franchisor’s country of residence, to have sufficient personal data protection standards, and for the transfer to be conducted in accordance with any relevant rules that may be prescribed by the Personal Data Protection Committee established under the PDPA.

4. Updating franchise agreements and franchise operations manuals

Franchisors should also review and update their existing franchise agreements to account for compliance with the PDPA. In addition to standard clauses requiring a franchisee to ensure compliance with applicable personal data protection laws such as the PDPA, franchisors should consider including robust provisions on franchisees’ data processing obligations, security audit requirements, and compliance training obligations in their franchise agreements. Further, while it is already standard practice for franchisors to require their franchisees to obtain various types of insurance policies, such as general liability insurance, workers’ compensation insurance, and property insurance, with the increased risk in cybersecurity threats and the risks they pose to customers’ personal data, franchisors should also now consider requiring franchisees to obtain cybersecurity insurance.

Franchise operation manuals should also be updated so that they are aligned with the obligations imposed under the PDPA. For example, under the PDPA, data subjects, such as consumers and employees of franchise businesses, have various rights in relation to the collection, use, and disclosure of their personal data. This includes, among others, the right to access their personal data, the right to require their personal data to be provided in a commonly used electronic form or to be sent to another data controller (also known as the right to data portability), and the right to correct or delete their personal data.

5. Conducting compliance training for employees and other stakeholders within the organization

Compliance training is crucial to ensure that all relevant stakeholders in the franchisor’s and franchisee’s organizations understand the implications of the PDPA on the franchise business. This is also of particular importance for foreign franchisors that are subject to the GDPR, which requires data controllers to be able to demonstrate compliance with the accountability principle under the GDPR.

Franchisors and franchisees should conduct PDPA compliance training for their employees in Thailand so that the employees understand what they can and cannot do with customer information. For example, franchises operating in the education sector, such as preschools, day care centers and language schools, should train teachers and administrative staff on the handling of minors’ personal data. The PDPA imposes different obligations on data controllers in relation to consent requirements for collection of minors’ personal data. While parental consent is necessary for minors below 10 years old, parental consent may not be required for matters in which a minor between 10 and 20 years old is deemed competent to provide consent—in which case the minor’s consent alone is sufficient. The adoption of technology in provision of services, such as the use of CCTVs and parent-teacher communication applications where photographs and videos of children’s activities are shared and tracked, further elevates the importance of PDPA-compliant training among teaching faculty.

Noncompliance with the PDPA can expose franchise businesses to significant monetary and reputational risks. Under the PDPA, franchisors and franchisees acting in their capacity as data controllers are subject to administrative fines of up to THB 5 million (approximately USD 145,500), as well as criminal fines of up to THB 1 million (approximately USD 29,100). Thai courts are also empowered to award punitive damages, as well as impose imprisonment for up to one year. Similarly, franchisees acting as data processors can also be subject to administrative fines of up to THB 5 million  (approximately USD 145,500). Hence, franchisors and franchisees must be aware of their obligations under the PDPA and take steps to ensure that their data collection, use, and disclosure practices are aligned with the demands under the new law.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Intellectual Property

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 11, 2026
Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has published a new five-year master plan that will bring significant regulatory changes to the broadcasting and digital media sectors, including formal licensing requirements for internet-based audiovisual services. The Master Plan for Broadcasting and Television, 3rd Edition (B.E. 2569–2573/2026–2030) was published in the Government Gazette on September 1, 2026, and will affect OTT platforms, internet-based audiovisual service providers, and traditional broadcasters. Licensing Reform The NBTC will develop new licensing frameworks ahead of existing digital television license expirations, which are slated to occur between 2028 and 2030. This creates both uncertainty and opportunity for incumbents and new market entrants. New licensing criteria will also be developed for audiovisual services delivered over the internet, meaning previously unregulated internet-based providers may face licensing, fee, and content obligations for the first time. The plan also calls for a new law to govern converged communications services. OTT Regulation and Content Oversight The plan explicitly acknowledges and aims to lessen the regulatory asymmetry between traditional broadcasters—which are subject to licensing, fees, and content regulation—and internet-based services that currently face fewer obligations. The NBTC intends to develop regulatory frameworks to bring internet-based audiovisual services, including OTT platforms, streaming services, and user-generated content platforms, under content, consumer protection, and licensing requirements. Consumer Protection and Digital Rights The NBTC will strengthen its oversight of broadcasting, television, and telecommunications operators to ensure compliance with consumer protection and personal data protection requirements. This includes updating relevant notifications and orders and more strictly enforcing rules against practices that unfairly exploit consumers. These measures may layer NBTC-specific requirements on top of Thailand’s existing Personal Data Protection Act obligations. Stricter enforcement against practices that exploit consumers is a priority, with particular scrutiny on advertising practices. The NBTC will modernize complaint resolution processes, meaning service providers should
Read More
September 7, 2026
On September 4, 2026, Thailand’s prime minister convened the first meeting of the Data Center Business Policy Committee. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework for the data center industry and tasked four subcommittees with developing the standards that would sit beneath it, shifting away from fragmented, agency-by-agency approvals toward a unified national strategy aiming to maximize economic value while managing environmental and infrastructure concerns. Proposed Scope and Pillars of the National Data Center Policy Framework The proposed framework would cover all types of data centers, including internal or captive facilities operated within a company or its affiliates, rather than only commercial third-party providers. If adopted in this form, companies running private data centers purely for internal purposes would also become subject to regulatory oversight. Minimum safety and operational standards would be established, with uniform enforcement across all categories. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework with four key pillars: Industrial classification: Data centers exceeding 2 MW would be classified as industrial operations, which may require factory licenses and environmental impact assessments under the Factory Act. Resource pricing: Utility rates would be structured to reflect both direct and indirect costs, supporting green energy and green data center standards. Centralized screening: A centralized review would evaluate project suitability and resource allocation. Operators may be required to submit proposals through periodic “pitching” rounds, where projects are competitively assessed on their potential economic and strategic benefits to Thailand. Digital ecosystem: The framework would prioritize data sovereignty, tax incentives, and conditions promoting domestic digital businesses, AI, and cloud infrastructure. Multidimensional Evaluation Criteria and Subcommittees Four subcommittees will be established to develop standards responsible for the following dimensions: Economic: Criteria for assessing the economic viability of data center projects, for use in prioritizing data centers based on infrastructure readiness, demand type (including AI factories),
Read More
September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership
Read More
September 2, 2026
Thailand and China have a longstanding and significant trade relationship, which increasingly extends to e-commerce and digitally enabled supply chains. While these channels create new opportunities for businesses to reach consumers across borders, their growth also brings greater exposure to intellectual property (IP) infringement across jurisdictions and online platforms. Effective cooperation between the two countries’ enforcement authorities has therefore become increasingly important. To strengthen cooperation in this area, Thailand and China signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on IP enforcement in Beijing on July 20, 2026, during the Thai prime minister’s official visit to China. Officially titled “Memorandum of Understanding Between the State Administration for Market Regulation of the People’s Republic of China and the Ministry of Commerce of the Kingdom of Thailand on Cooperation in the Field of Intellectual Property Enforcement,” the MOU forms part of a broader bilateral agenda covering industrial and supply chains, participation by micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), cooperation associated with the ASEAN–China Free Trade Area 3.0, and progress on the registration of Thai geographical indications in China. The MOU establishes a bilateral framework for cooperation and coordination in five broad areas: Strengthening dialogue in IP enforcement; Enhancing information sharing; Facilitating the enforcement of IP rights in cases arising in the parties’ domestic markets and on online platforms, in accordance with their respective domestic laws; Promoting cooperation in IP enforcement training and human resource development; and Undertaking other cooperation activities agreed upon by both sides. The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) will serve as the principal coordinating agency for Thailand, while the Bureau of Law Enforcement and Inspection in China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) will serve in that role for China. The framework is particularly relevant to the growth of e-commerce, as it covers infringement in the domestic markets and on
Read More