You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 3, 2020

Employment in Myanmar during the COVID-19 Outbreak

Bangkok Post Human Resources Watch

Many Thai and international companies have expanded rapidly into Myanmar in recent years, in what had seemed to be an unstoppable expansion of cross-border trade resulting from the country’s emergence back onto the global stage. For those companies, the COVID-19 situation in Myanmar has been a cause for much concern and uncertainty—doubly so for those who had hired staff in the jurisdiction, as a lack of clarity regarding their obligations as employers was compounded by a lack of information on the situation on the ground.

While the outbreak in Myanmar looked like it was under control earlier this year, a resurgence—many times stronger than the first wave—has struck in recent months, and Myanmar’s recorded cases now number in the tens of thousands, with over 1,100 deaths.

For employers faced with this situation, staying up-to-date with the legal landscape is critical. Since the first reported case of COVID-19 in Myanmar, on March 23, 2020, the Myanmar government has been watching the situation closely and issuing notifications and preventive guidelines. Employers who understand what these guidelines mean for their employment relationships, as well as how to stay compliant with current employment-related legislation during these challenges, can decrease the risk of employment disputes or other problems that may arise.

General Employment Regulations

In Myanmar, there is no single regulation governing employment relationships. Rather, employment is governed by written legislation and practices of township labour offices and the Department of Labour (DOL) under the Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population of Myanmar.

For companies with more than five local employees, employment agreements must follow the employment contract form (ECF) prescribed by the DOL, while the employees themselves must be registered with their respective township labour office. The Social Security Law 2012 also requires employers (again, with more than five employees) to contribute to the state-run social security fund by withholding 2 percent of the employee’s total monthly wages and contributing an additional amount equal to 3 percent of the employee’s monthly wages (making a total contribution of 5 percent) to the social security fund. Moreover, the minimum wage for all businesses with ten or more employees, as announced by the National Minimum Wage Committee in 2018, is set at MMK 600 (THB 15) per hour, and MMK 4,800 (THB 120) for an eight-hour workday.

In regard to termination of employment, employers must follow the standard termination requirements set out in the ECF, which allows for termination either by mutual agreement with the employee or by providing the employee with at least one month’s prior notice and valid reasons for termination, in addition to the applicable severance payments. These payments vary depending on the length of the employee’s service and are forfeited if the employee has committed misconduct (a narrowly defined term that employers should be cautious in using).

Occupational Safety and Health

To combat the renewed threat of widespread COVID-19 transmission, the Ministry of Health and Sport made two announcements in late September requiring all employees of organisations and companies to work from home, except for employees of essential businesses such as financial services, food production, medical supplies, and so on.

During this time, employers also need to be especially mindful of the country’s Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019, which governs all aspects of health and safety and lays out employers’ duties and responsibilities. These include arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational ailment; providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities (and seeing that they make use of them); and distributing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines to raise employees’ awareness of health and safety measures.

Employers are also obligated to report any suspected outbreak of COVID-19 to the appropriate health officer, as Myanmar has defined COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995. In addition to instituting this reporting requirement for suspected occurrences of communicable diseases, the law also authorises health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo quarantine at home—violations of which may lead to fines and imprisonment.

Contingencies and Disputes

There is no change to the termination formalities for COVID-19-related contingencies (such as the measures to mitigate the financial impact of layoffs or workforce reductions seen in some other jurisdictions). The requirement of one month’s notice prior to termination still applies, and employers may not cite the crisis as justification for foregoing or reducing severance payments. However, it does appear that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be a valid reason for the termination itself.

In establishments with more than 30 employees, workplace coordinating committees must be established to promote good employer-employee relationships and coordinate with any labour organisation that may exist at the workplace. Each workplace coordinating committee consists of three individuals nominated by the labour organisations or employees, along with three people nominated by the employer. The committee hears individual disputes, oversees negotiations between parties, and conducts its own negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Although this requirement pre-dates the COVID-19 crisis, any disputes that arise as a result of it should still be referred to the relevant committee.

In employment disputes, including those arising as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the workplace coordinating committee will have the chance to reach a solution within five days, after which the matter will be escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three more days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement, which will reach a decision within seven days and will communicate this decision within a further two days. If a party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lockout or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

Staying Informed

Having a clear grasp of Myanmar labour law, along with an awareness of the steps that the Myanmar government has taken to deal with the crisis, can help employers make informed decisions about the best strategy for their business to navigate through the crisis and to thrive in what the management consulting firm McKinsey calls the “next normal.”  This can seem especially daunting in Myanmar, where ongoing legal reforms are continuing in tandem with the government’s crisis response. However, for those with a firm grounding in the latest labour-related laws and regulations and a legally compliant human resources plan, long-term success is within reach.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed on the Bangkok Post website.

For companies with more than five local employees, employment agreements must follow the employment contract form (ECF) prescribed by the DOL, while the employees themselves must be registered with their respective township labour office. The Social Security Law 2012 also requires employers (again, with more than five employees) to contribute to the state-run social security fund by withholding 2 percent of the employee’s total monthly wages and contributing an additional amount equal to 3 percent of the employee’s monthly wages (making a total contribution of 5 percent) to the social security fund. Moreover, the minimum wage for all businesses with ten or more employees, as announced by the National Minimum Wage Committee in 2018, is set at MMK 600 (THB 15) per hour, and MMK 4,800 (THB 120) for an eight-hour workday.

In regard to termination of employment, employers must follow the standard termination requirements set out in the ECF, which allows for termination either by mutual agreement with the employee or by providing the employee with at least one month’s prior notice and valid reasons for termination, in addition to the applicable severance payments. These payments vary depending on the length of the employee’s service and are forfeited if the employee has committed misconduct (a narrowly defined term that employers should be cautious in using).

Occupational Safety and Health

To combat the renewed threat of widespread COVID-19 transmission, the Ministry of Health and Sport made two announcements in late September requiring all employees of organisations and companies to work from home, except for employees of essential businesses such as financial services, food production, medical supplies, and so on.

During this time, employers also need to be especially mindful of the country’s Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019, which governs all aspects of health and safety and lays out employers’ duties and responsibilities. These include arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational ailment; providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities (and seeing that they make use of them); and distributing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines to raise employees’ awareness of health and safety measures.

Employers are also obligated to report any suspected outbreak of COVID-19 to the appropriate health officer, as Myanmar has defined COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995. In addition to instituting this reporting requirement for suspected occurrences of communicable diseases, the law also authorises health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo quarantine at home—violations of which may lead to fines and imprisonment.

Contingencies and Disputes

There is no change to the termination formalities for COVID-19-related contingencies (such as the measures to mitigate the financial impact of layoffs or workforce reductions seen in some other jurisdictions). The requirement of one month’s notice prior to termination still applies, and employers may not cite the crisis as justification for foregoing or reducing severance payments. However, it does appear that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be a valid reason for the termination itself.

In establishments with more than 30 employees, workplace coordinating committees must be established to promote good employer-employee relationships and coordinate with any labour organisation that may exist at the workplace. Each workplace coordinating committee consists of three individuals nominated by the labour organisations or employees, along with three people nominated by the employer. The committee hears individual disputes, oversees negotiations between parties, and conducts its own negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Although this requirement pre-dates the COVID-19 crisis, any disputes that arise as a result of it should still be referred to the relevant committee.

In employment disputes, including those arising as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the workplace coordinating committee will have the chance to reach a solution within five days, after which the matter will be escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three more days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement, which will reach a decision within seven days and will communicate this decision within a further two days. If a party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lockout or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

Staying Informed

Having a clear grasp of Myanmar labour law, along with an awareness of the steps that the Myanmar government has taken to deal with the crisis, can help employers make informed decisions about the best strategy for their business to navigate through the crisis and to thrive in what the management consulting firm McKinsey calls the “next normal.”  This can seem especially daunting in Myanmar, where ongoing legal reforms are continuing in tandem with the government’s crisis response. However, for those with a firm grounding in the latest labour-related laws and regulations and a legally compliant human resources plan, long-term success is within reach.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed on the Bangkok Post website.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 28, 2026
On July 22, 2026, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 292/2026/ND-CP detailing the implementation of the Law on Foreign Trade Management (Decree 292). Decree 292 came into effect on September 5, 2026, replacing Decree No. 69/2018/NND-CP, and introduces several important changes to Vietnam’s foreign trade regime. Of particular relevance is the addition to the list of goods prohibited from importation of “products and goods extracted, produced, or manufactured wholly or partly through forced labor by enterprises, countries, or territories in accordance with relevant international treaties to which the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a party.” This new prohibition introduces forced-labor considerations into Vietnam’s import compliance framework and may have practical implications for how businesses manage related risks across their operations and supply chains. Implementation of the New Prohibition According to Decree 292, the minister or head of the relevant ministerial-level agency is responsible for publishing the detailed list and corresponding harmonized system (HS) codes for each category of goods prohibited from export or import under its purview. Goods involving forced labor fall under the purview of the Ministry of Home Affairs. However, as of the date of this article, no corresponding list has been published specifying the goods to which the forced-labor prohibition applies, leaving businesses without official guidance on how the prohibition will be applied or enforced in practice. Nevertheless, this absence does not suspend the prohibition’s application. As Decree 292 has already taken effect, goods involving forced labor remain subject to the general legal framework applicable to goods prohibited from importation. In particular, Decree 169/2026/ND-CP provides for administrative penalties for the importation or transportation of prohibited goods into Vietnam. Depending on the nature and circumstances of the violation, criminal liability may also arise under the Criminal Code. In practice, enforcement is likely to depend on the
September 23, 2026
Many multinational companies are familiar with the concept of “time off in lieu” (TOIL), under which employees receive compensatory time off instead of overtime pay for additional hours worked. While TOIL is common in many jurisdictions, employers in Thailand should be cautious, as Thai labor law does not expressly recognize TOIL as a substitute for statutory overtime-related compensation. Under the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998) (LPA), employees who work overtime or perform work on holidays are generally entitled to statutory overtime, holiday, or holiday overtime compensation, including: Overtime Pay: 1.5 times the employee’s normal wage rate for work performed beyond normal working hours on a regular working day. Holiday Pay: 1 or 2 times the employee’s normal wage rate for work performed during normal working hours on a holiday, depending on category of employee. Holiday Overtime Pay: 3 times the employee’s normal wage rate for overtime work performed on a holiday. Importantly, the LPA does not contain any provision expressly permitting employers to substitute overtime-related compensation with compensatory leave, as such compensation is treated as a payment obligation rather than additional time off. Why TOIL Can Be Risky in Thailand Thai labor law is protective in nature, and statutory entitlements to overtime, holiday, and holiday overtime pay are generally regarded as minimum employee rights. As a result, these rights cannot be waived, even with the employee’s consent. Therefore, an employer who grants TOIL instead of paying statutory overtime-related compensation may still be exposed to claims for unpaid amounts, notwithstanding that compensatory leave has already been provided. Thai courts have affirmed this principle, holding that employers remain liable for statutory payments for work performed beyond normal working hours even where substitute time off has been granted. Are There Any Exceptions? Certain categories of employees are exempt from overtime-related compensation,
September 9, 2026
On August 25, 2026, Thailand’s cabinet approved in principle a draft amendment that would extend mandatory social security coverage to three categories of workers currently excluded from Thailand’s compulsory social security system. The amendment, proposed by the Ministry of Labour, would modify the Royal Decree Prescribing Businesses and Employees Excluded from the Social Security Act B.E. 2560 (2017). Newly Covered Workers The cabinet-approved proposal would remove the exclusions for the following three categories of employees, bringing them within Thailand’s mandatory social security system: Workers in seasonal cultivation (pho pluk), forestry (pa mai), and livestock (liang sat) businesses that do not employ workers year-round and whose operations do not include other types of business activities. Notably, fishery (pramong) workers were excluded from this amendment following objections raised at a Social Security Board meeting on April 30, 2025, because employers and employees in the fishery sector can already agree to opt into social security coverage under fishery labor laws. Domestic workers and other employees of individual employers where the work performed is not part of a business operation (e.g., housekeepers, gardeners, drivers). This group has actively demanded inclusion in the social security system. Workers employed in street-stall businesses operating fixed street stalls (kan kha phaeng loi). The rationale for including street-stall workers is that their employers have fixed, identifiable places of business that can be inspected. Accordingly, workers engaged in itinerant street hawking (kan kha re) remain excluded. The expanded coverage would apply to both Thai and foreign employees who possess valid identity documents and work permits, including migrant workers who have been granted special permission to work in Thailand. The Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990) does not restrict social security registration based on nationality, allowing these workers to register as insured persons under section 33. Employer Obligations and Employee
September 4, 2026
Thailand’s cabinet has approved two draft amendments aimed at improving labor-related judicial proceedings. The proposed amendments to the Act on the Establishment of Labor Courts and Labor Case Procedure B.E. 2522 (1979) and the Act on Procedures for Human Trafficking Cases B.E. 2559 (2016) are intended to make the process more efficient, appropriate, and fair. Key elements of these proposed amendments are outlined below. Expansion of Labor Court Jurisdiction Under the current framework, labor courts generally hear labor disputes, while criminal offenses under labor laws are handled separately. Matters involving both labor and criminal issues may therefore require the parties to pursue proceedings before different courts. To address this, the proposed amendments would expand the jurisdiction of labor courts to cover certain criminal offenses under labor laws. The government states that the change is intended to allow related issues to be heard by judges with expertise in labor law and to reduce the need for parallel proceedings. The proposed amendments also set out the following rules for cases involving multiple offenses. Where a single act gives rise to multiple offenses and at least one of those offenses falls within the jurisdiction of the labor court, the labor court may hear the related offenses as part of the same case. Where multiple connected acts give rise to different offenses, the labor court may hear the matters together or transfer part of the case to the appropriate court, taking into account convenience and the interests of justice. Criminal Offenses Covered The proposed amendments would extend labor court jurisdiction to criminal offenses under 11 labor-related laws, including laws concerning: Home workers protection Labor protection Labor protection in fisheries work Employment and job-seeker protection Management of foreign workers Social security Occupational safety, health, and working environment Compensation Maritime labor State enterprise labor relations