You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 3, 2020

Employment in Myanmar during the COVID-19 Outbreak

Bangkok Post Human Resources Watch

Many Thai and international companies have expanded rapidly into Myanmar in recent years, in what had seemed to be an unstoppable expansion of cross-border trade resulting from the country’s emergence back onto the global stage. For those companies, the COVID-19 situation in Myanmar has been a cause for much concern and uncertainty—doubly so for those who had hired staff in the jurisdiction, as a lack of clarity regarding their obligations as employers was compounded by a lack of information on the situation on the ground.

While the outbreak in Myanmar looked like it was under control earlier this year, a resurgence—many times stronger than the first wave—has struck in recent months, and Myanmar’s recorded cases now number in the tens of thousands, with over 1,100 deaths.

For employers faced with this situation, staying up-to-date with the legal landscape is critical. Since the first reported case of COVID-19 in Myanmar, on March 23, 2020, the Myanmar government has been watching the situation closely and issuing notifications and preventive guidelines. Employers who understand what these guidelines mean for their employment relationships, as well as how to stay compliant with current employment-related legislation during these challenges, can decrease the risk of employment disputes or other problems that may arise.

General Employment Regulations

In Myanmar, there is no single regulation governing employment relationships. Rather, employment is governed by written legislation and practices of township labour offices and the Department of Labour (DOL) under the Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population of Myanmar.

For companies with more than five local employees, employment agreements must follow the employment contract form (ECF) prescribed by the DOL, while the employees themselves must be registered with their respective township labour office. The Social Security Law 2012 also requires employers (again, with more than five employees) to contribute to the state-run social security fund by withholding 2 percent of the employee’s total monthly wages and contributing an additional amount equal to 3 percent of the employee’s monthly wages (making a total contribution of 5 percent) to the social security fund. Moreover, the minimum wage for all businesses with ten or more employees, as announced by the National Minimum Wage Committee in 2018, is set at MMK 600 (THB 15) per hour, and MMK 4,800 (THB 120) for an eight-hour workday.

In regard to termination of employment, employers must follow the standard termination requirements set out in the ECF, which allows for termination either by mutual agreement with the employee or by providing the employee with at least one month’s prior notice and valid reasons for termination, in addition to the applicable severance payments. These payments vary depending on the length of the employee’s service and are forfeited if the employee has committed misconduct (a narrowly defined term that employers should be cautious in using).

Occupational Safety and Health

To combat the renewed threat of widespread COVID-19 transmission, the Ministry of Health and Sport made two announcements in late September requiring all employees of organisations and companies to work from home, except for employees of essential businesses such as financial services, food production, medical supplies, and so on.

During this time, employers also need to be especially mindful of the country’s Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019, which governs all aspects of health and safety and lays out employers’ duties and responsibilities. These include arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational ailment; providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities (and seeing that they make use of them); and distributing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines to raise employees’ awareness of health and safety measures.

Employers are also obligated to report any suspected outbreak of COVID-19 to the appropriate health officer, as Myanmar has defined COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995. In addition to instituting this reporting requirement for suspected occurrences of communicable diseases, the law also authorises health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo quarantine at home—violations of which may lead to fines and imprisonment.

Contingencies and Disputes

There is no change to the termination formalities for COVID-19-related contingencies (such as the measures to mitigate the financial impact of layoffs or workforce reductions seen in some other jurisdictions). The requirement of one month’s notice prior to termination still applies, and employers may not cite the crisis as justification for foregoing or reducing severance payments. However, it does appear that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be a valid reason for the termination itself.

In establishments with more than 30 employees, workplace coordinating committees must be established to promote good employer-employee relationships and coordinate with any labour organisation that may exist at the workplace. Each workplace coordinating committee consists of three individuals nominated by the labour organisations or employees, along with three people nominated by the employer. The committee hears individual disputes, oversees negotiations between parties, and conducts its own negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Although this requirement pre-dates the COVID-19 crisis, any disputes that arise as a result of it should still be referred to the relevant committee.

In employment disputes, including those arising as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the workplace coordinating committee will have the chance to reach a solution within five days, after which the matter will be escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three more days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement, which will reach a decision within seven days and will communicate this decision within a further two days. If a party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lockout or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

Staying Informed

Having a clear grasp of Myanmar labour law, along with an awareness of the steps that the Myanmar government has taken to deal with the crisis, can help employers make informed decisions about the best strategy for their business to navigate through the crisis and to thrive in what the management consulting firm McKinsey calls the “next normal.”  This can seem especially daunting in Myanmar, where ongoing legal reforms are continuing in tandem with the government’s crisis response. However, for those with a firm grounding in the latest labour-related laws and regulations and a legally compliant human resources plan, long-term success is within reach.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed on the Bangkok Post website.

For companies with more than five local employees, employment agreements must follow the employment contract form (ECF) prescribed by the DOL, while the employees themselves must be registered with their respective township labour office. The Social Security Law 2012 also requires employers (again, with more than five employees) to contribute to the state-run social security fund by withholding 2 percent of the employee’s total monthly wages and contributing an additional amount equal to 3 percent of the employee’s monthly wages (making a total contribution of 5 percent) to the social security fund. Moreover, the minimum wage for all businesses with ten or more employees, as announced by the National Minimum Wage Committee in 2018, is set at MMK 600 (THB 15) per hour, and MMK 4,800 (THB 120) for an eight-hour workday.

In regard to termination of employment, employers must follow the standard termination requirements set out in the ECF, which allows for termination either by mutual agreement with the employee or by providing the employee with at least one month’s prior notice and valid reasons for termination, in addition to the applicable severance payments. These payments vary depending on the length of the employee’s service and are forfeited if the employee has committed misconduct (a narrowly defined term that employers should be cautious in using).

Occupational Safety and Health

To combat the renewed threat of widespread COVID-19 transmission, the Ministry of Health and Sport made two announcements in late September requiring all employees of organisations and companies to work from home, except for employees of essential businesses such as financial services, food production, medical supplies, and so on.

During this time, employers also need to be especially mindful of the country’s Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019, which governs all aspects of health and safety and lays out employers’ duties and responsibilities. These include arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational ailment; providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities (and seeing that they make use of them); and distributing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines to raise employees’ awareness of health and safety measures.

Employers are also obligated to report any suspected outbreak of COVID-19 to the appropriate health officer, as Myanmar has defined COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995. In addition to instituting this reporting requirement for suspected occurrences of communicable diseases, the law also authorises health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo quarantine at home—violations of which may lead to fines and imprisonment.

Contingencies and Disputes

There is no change to the termination formalities for COVID-19-related contingencies (such as the measures to mitigate the financial impact of layoffs or workforce reductions seen in some other jurisdictions). The requirement of one month’s notice prior to termination still applies, and employers may not cite the crisis as justification for foregoing or reducing severance payments. However, it does appear that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be a valid reason for the termination itself.

In establishments with more than 30 employees, workplace coordinating committees must be established to promote good employer-employee relationships and coordinate with any labour organisation that may exist at the workplace. Each workplace coordinating committee consists of three individuals nominated by the labour organisations or employees, along with three people nominated by the employer. The committee hears individual disputes, oversees negotiations between parties, and conducts its own negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Although this requirement pre-dates the COVID-19 crisis, any disputes that arise as a result of it should still be referred to the relevant committee.

In employment disputes, including those arising as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the workplace coordinating committee will have the chance to reach a solution within five days, after which the matter will be escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three more days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement, which will reach a decision within seven days and will communicate this decision within a further two days. If a party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lockout or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

Staying Informed

Having a clear grasp of Myanmar labour law, along with an awareness of the steps that the Myanmar government has taken to deal with the crisis, can help employers make informed decisions about the best strategy for their business to navigate through the crisis and to thrive in what the management consulting firm McKinsey calls the “next normal.”  This can seem especially daunting in Myanmar, where ongoing legal reforms are continuing in tandem with the government’s crisis response. However, for those with a firm grounding in the latest labour-related laws and regulations and a legally compliant human resources plan, long-term success is within reach.

 

This article was originally published in the Bangkok Post and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed on the Bangkok Post website.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The