You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 30, 2019

Decree 169: New Regulations on Medical Devices in Vietnam

On December 31, 2018, the Vietnamese government promulgated Decree No. 169/2018/ND-CP (Decree 169), amending Decree No. 36/2017/ND-CP (Decree 36) on medical device management. Decree 169 took immediate effect upon its issuance. The new regulations will have a great impact on the circulation of medical devices, especially foreign products, in Vietnam. Some of the major changes are set out below.

Classification of Medical Devices

Medical devices in Vietnam are classified and managed based on their potential risks, as determined by qualified entities. Under the previous regulation (Decree 36), risk classification results from qualified foreign entities could be recognized in Vietnam without conducting a separate local classification. This was beneficial to foreign manufacturers who sell their products in many countries, as it required no further time and expense for the local classification procedure in Vietnam and ensured a single classification result across multiple markets.

However, from January 1, 2019, foreign classification results are no longer accepted in Vietnam. Instead, the results must come from qualified local entities. It is worth noting that some local entities, despite being considered qualified by the Ministry of Health (MOH), still do not have appropriate capacity to conduct medical device classifications and, in practice, have issued classification results that were not accurate.

The classification rules under Decree 169 are generally stricter than under Decree36. For example, the final classification results will use the highest risk classification, regardless of whether the product has many use purposes or is combined with other medical devices with different risk classifications.

If an incorrect local classification result is submitted to the authority for product registration purposes, the authority will refuse to grant a product registration number if the number is not yet issued or revoke a registration number that has been granted, and may recall any circulating products.

Transitional Regulations

Decree 169 sets out the transition mechanisms as below.

  • Foreign classification results submitted to the authorities prior to December 31, 2018, will continue to be used for the registration procedure.
  • Local classification results issued before December 31, 2018, will be published on the MOH’s online system (http://dmec.moh.gov.vn) before April 1, 2019. MA license/import license holders are then required to review the relevant classification results in light of the classification rules under Decree 169 and report any incorrect classification to the MOH prior to July 1, 2019.

Registration of Medical Devices

Class A Medical Devices

A major change for Class A (lowest risk) medical devices is that the certificate of free sale (CFS) – not previously required – must now be included in any registration dossier submitted after December 31, 2018. This change may cause some difficulties for foreign manufacturers in terms of cost and time, and in some cases it may be impossible to obtain the CFS because some products that are considered Class A medical devices in Vietnam are not considered medical devices in other countries.

Previously, the granted registration of a Class A medical device could not be amended. If any change arose, a new registration procedure was required. However, Decree 169 stipulates a more flexible mechanism, in which the following changes can be made to the registration during the circulation of Class A medical devices.

  • Address of product owner or license holder.
  • Name of license holder.
  • Either name or address of product manufacturer.
  • Product packaging for in vitro medical devices.
  • Warranty establishments.
  • Labels and instructions for use, but the indication of the product cannot be changed.

Class B, C and D Medical Devices

A positive development for medical device companies is that Decree 169 allows a newly added form of registration, namely, “quick registration.” This will reduce the statutory time required to obtain a registration number from 60 days to 30 days, but is only applicable to the following situations:

  • The product has been circulated in at least two of the following countries: Japan, Canada, Australia, United States, or EU member country.
  • The product was circulated in Vietnam prior to December 31, 2018, and satisfies both of the following conditions: (i) The product was circulated for at least three years within the period of five years before the submission date, and (ii) there have been no warnings about the quality or safety of the product.

Additionally, from July 1, 2020, it will be required to include the ASEAN Common Submission Dossier Template (CSDT) in the submitted registration dossier for Class B, C and D medical devices. At that time, it will no longer be necessary to submit the technical document, instructions for use, and labels. It is expected that the MOH will issue further guidance on CSDT soon.

Decree 169 helps to simplify the customs clearance procedure by emphasizing that medical devices will be allowed to be imported into Vietnam without a written confirmation from the MOH that defines the imported product as a medical device when conducting customs clearance.

Transitional Regulations

In the transition time, it is worth noting the following regulations:

  • Class A medical devices are only allowed to be imported if they are registered.
  • A marketing authorization (MA) license for Class B, C, and D medical devices will only be required from January 1, 2020, onwards, instead of January 1, 2018, as set forth under Decree 36.
  • It is required to have a valid import license to import Class B, C, and D medical devices which are specifically listed out in Circular 30/2015/TT-BYT on Import of Medical Devices (Circular 30). Import licenses issued in 2018 (expiring on December 31, 2018) or 2019 will be valid until December 31, 2019.
  • Class B, C and D medical devices that are not specifically listed out in Circular 30 can continue to be freely imported into Vietnam without any import license, provided that their certificates of classification results are published on the MOH website http://dmec.moh.gov.vn.
  • For IVD biologicals (e.g., microbiology reagents, histology reagents, etc.), Decree 169 sets out specific regulations under which such IVD biologicals can still be treated as drugs under the Pharma Law.
  • For chemicals, insecticides and germicides for household and medical use, with only one indication of disinfecting medical devices, which have been granted MA licenses which expire after July 1, 2016 and before January 1, 2019, their MA licenses will be used until December 31, 2019.
Related Professionals

RELATED INSIGHTS​

July 24, 2024
Experts from Tilleke & Gibbins’ intellectual property team have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam to Thomson Reuters Practical Law, a high-level comparative overview of  laws and regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Intellectual Property Transactions focuses on business-related aspects of intellectual property, such as the value of intellectual assets in M&A transactions, and the licensing of IP portfolios. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations. IP audits. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence, warranties/indemnities, and transfer of IPRs. Employee and consultant agreements. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Vietnam overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Intellectual property specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins in Thailand have contributed an updated Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview for Thomson Reuters Practical Law, an online publication that provides comprehensive legal guides for jurisdictions worldwide. The Thailand overview was authored by Darani Vachanavuttivong, managing partner of Tilleke & Gibbins and managing director of the firm’s regional IP practice; Titikaan Ungbhakorn, senior associate and patent agent; and San Chaithiraphant, senior associate. The chapter delivers a high-level examination of critical aspects of IP law, including IP assignment and licensing, research and development collaborations, IP in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), securing loans with intellectual property rights, settlement agreements, employee-related IP issues, competition law, taxation, and non-tariff trade barriers. Key topics covered in the chapter include: IP assignment: Basis and formalities for assignments of patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, trade secrets, confidential information, and domain names. IP licensing: Scope and formalities for licensing patents, utility models, trademarks, copyright, design rights, and trade secrets. Research and development collaborations: Management of improvements, derivatives, and joint ownership of IP. IP aspects of M&A: Due diligence and critical considerations during mergers and acquisitions. Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The Intellectual Property Transactions Global Guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the Intellectual Property Transactions in Thailand overview, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
July 24, 2024
Acted as lead counsel for Nordic Transport Group A/S (NTG), an international freight forwarding company based in Denmark, in its acquisition of a stake in Asia-based Freightzen Logistics Ltd., Inc. through a newly established subsidiary, NTG APAC Holding Pte. Ltd.
July 23, 2024
In the Who’s Who Legal (WWL) Southeast Asia guide for 2024, a total of 12 Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers have been distinguished as market leaders in various legal practice areas. The firm’s 12 recognized lawyers, singled out for their commitment to delivering exceptional legal services to Tilleke & Gibbins’ clients, are grouped into seven practice areas: Asset Recovery: Thawat Damsa-ard Data: Alan Adcock, Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh Franchise: Alan Adcock, Jay Cohen Intellectual Property: Alan Adcock (Patents, Trademarks), Darani Vachanavuttivong (Patents, Trademarks), Kasama Sriwatanakul (Trademarks), Linh Thi Mai Nguyen (Trademarks), Somboon Earterasarun (Trademarks), Wongrat Ratanaprayul (Patents) Investigations: John Frangos and Thawat Damsa-ard Labor, Employment, and Benefits: Pimvimol (June) Vipamaneerut Life Sciences: Alan Adcock, Loc Xuan Le The annual WWL Southeast Asia rankings guide, published by the London-based group Law Business Research, aims to identify the foremost legal practitioners across a range of business law practice areas. The rankings are largely based on feedback and nominations received from other WWL-ranked and nominated attorneys around the world. These peer-driven recognitions highlight Tilleke & Gibbins’ dedication to maintaining the highest standards of legal service and helping clients achieve success. To read more about the WWL Southeast Asia guide, or to browse the full results, please visit the WWL website.