You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 26, 2016

Product Labeling in Laos: New Regulations Require Local Language on Packaging

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

The Lao government has recently stepped up its efforts to raise public awareness of health issues and the quality of products sold in the market. The impetus behind the government’s actions is largely attributable to one main factor—in Laos, most products still do not have labeling in the Lao language to provide consumers with information about the product, despite this being a requirement. In the past, the government generally turned a blind eye to this shortcoming in consumer protection, but this is now set to change.

Regulatory Framework

The Department of Internal Trade, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, recently issued Announcement 1285,  restating the requirement to include labels in the Lao language on products. The Announcement also granted all business operators involved in the manufacturing, importing, wholesaling, distributing, and retailing of goods an extension, until August 29, 2016, to bring their labeling in line with the requisite regulations.

The Announcement follows Ordinance 2501/MoIC DDT concerning Product Labeling in the Lao Language, which the Ministry of Industry and Commerce introduced on December 16, 2015. The Ordinance entered into force this year on January 8, followed on March 11 by the Department of Internal Trade issuing Recommendation 0281/MoIC, which restated much of the Ordinance and provided additional information on how it should be implemented by affected business operators.

The main reason for the Announcement and the Recommendation, which restate the Ordinance, is that almost no changes were made in practice after the Ordinance entered into force. Unfortunately, the duties and responsibilities of the administration were not adequately clarified under the Ordinance, meaning that it could not be properly implemented. The private sector was also largely unaware of the Ordinance, and even those who were aware had generally not yet taken action to adhere to the product labeling requirements.

Purpose of the Ordinance

The Ordinance aims to help consumers gain a better understanding of the benefits and qualities of products before purchasing and using them. This helps consumers  avoid purchasing low-quality or expired products, which could adversely affect their health, property, or the environment. In addition, under the Ordinance, domestic manufacturers and importers are encouraged to label their products in the Lao language prior to distribution. And the Ordinance also attempts to clarify the duties and responsibilities of the administration.

The Ordinance, rephrasing the Law on Consumer Protection 02/NA of 2010, also sets out the duties and responsibilities of local administrators in administering and monitoring product labels in the Lao language, and it includes product labeling obligations for manufacturers, importers, and distributors. It implores them to use product labels in the Lao language, particularly for products that could potentially endanger the life, health, and safety of consumers.

Product Labeling Requirements

Under the Ordinance,  product labels must comply with Article 19 of the Law on Consumer Protection, which requires information on product labels regarding the type of goods; trademark registered by the manufacturer and the trademark used in trade by the importer in Laos; location of manufacture, the importer’s trading address in Laos, and the country of origin of the manufacturer, when this is not Laos; and price, amount, quality, weight and net weight, components and component percentage, directions for use, warnings, date of manufacture, and the expiration date.

The Recommendation of March 11 leaves open the possibility of adding more information requirements in the future. In line with Article 19 of the Law on Consumer Protection, descriptive product information must be accurate, and it must not exaggerate any benefits or qualities.

Penalties

The Law on Consumer Protection stipulates that any business operator supplying goods that are not labeled or that contain incorrect information will have their business license suspended. The Ordinance, however, specifies that business operators who are found guilty of infringement for the first time will not have their business license suspended immediately.

The Ordinance provides different levels of sanctions for different types of operators, with retailers being subject to more lenient treatment than manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, or distributors. First-time violators receive a notification of the violation and a warning. When a violation is found, business operators have one month to bring their product labeling in line with the requisite regulations. A failure to do so can result in fines of LAK 500,000 to LAK 1 million (USD 62 to USD 124) for retailers, and LAK 5 million to LAK 7 million (USD 620 to USD 871) for manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, or distributors.

If business operators continue to fail to adhere to the labeling requirements after the first and second violations described above, retailers are liable to a fine of LAK 1 million to LAK 2 million (USD 124 to USD 248) and they risk having their unlabeled goods seized. Manufacturers, importers, wholesalers, and distributors that are found guilty of the same offense are liable to even more severe penalties ranging from LAK 7 million to LAK 9 million (USD 871 to USD 1120) and the possibility of having their business license suspended for as long as the infringement continues.

Products Exempted from the Ordinance

The Ordinance does not apply to certain types of goods, and it also takes into account the final purpose of goods. Therefore, certain products in the Ordinance are exempted from labeling requirements, including goods temporarily imported for subsequent export, goods temporarily imported for exhibition before being exported back to the original country, and goods in transit; gifts and souvenirs; fresh food and condiments without packaging directly sold to consumers; and raw materials without packaging imported for manufacturing in an industrial factory or for construction.

For products that are imported before August 29, the number of products without a Lao language label to be sold in the Lao market needs to be reported to the administration, to allow them to be “distributable” in the country.

Despite these limited exemptions, the Ordinance and its related regulations provide for far-reaching requirements for all businesses in the consumer goods sector. Businesses should take action immediately to comply with the new requirements, while closely monitoring the practical enforcement by local authorities.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 10, 2026
On June 17, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 on Nutritional Information on Processed Food Labels. The new regulation, which revokes three previous nutrition labeling regulations, introduces several notable changes affecting food and beverage manufacturers, importers, and distributors. These changes range from updated nutrient reference values and serving-size requirements to the introduction of the Nutri-Level front-of-pack labeling system for certain beverage products. Businesses operating in Indonesia should carefully review these developments and assess their products’ compliance with the new requirements during the transition period. Implementation of the Nutri-Level Labeling System To implement the recently issued decree on Nutri-Level labeling, BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 stipulates the requirements to implement the Nutri-Level labeling system on the front-of-pack. Under the new framework, ready-to-drink beverages, powdered beverages, and liquid or solid concentrates are required to display Nutri-Level labeling on the front label of their packaging. The Nutri-Level labeling system classifies products into color-coded levels A through D based on their sugar, sodium, and total fat content. The applicable Nutri-Level is determined based on the lowest level measured in the assessment of sugar, sodium, and total fat content. For products classified as level C or D, the Nutri-Level label must be accompanied by information on the relevant sugar, sodium, and total fat content per 100 ml of the ready-to-consume product. Products classified as level A or B may either display only the Nutri-Level designation or display the Nutri-Level together with the relevant nutritional information per 100 ml. Minimum Vitamin and Mineral Content Required for Declaration BPOM Regulation No. 10 of 2026 introduces a stricter threshold for the declaration of vitamins and minerals in the nutritional value information section (ING). Vitamins or minerals may only be declared if they are present at a
Read More
August 10, 2026
The drug registration process in Vietnam will be simplified, particularly for foreign applicants, following the recent issuance by Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) of a new circular that is expected to reduce administrative hurdles. Circular No. 32/2026/TT-BYT on the registration of drugs and medicinal ingredients (Circular 32) was issued on July 29, 2026, and will take effect on October 1, 2026, replacing Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT. Key provisions of the new circular are discussed below. Five-Year Data Exclusivity and Five-Month Public Disclosure Framework Circular 32 updates data protection guidelines by explicitly referencing Article 128 of the amended Intellectual Property Law, which sets out that new drugs supported by clinical trial data submitted for the first time will be granted a five-year data exclusivity period from the date of the initial marketing authorization (MA) approval. Subsequent applications that rely on the originator’s protected data will not be eligible for approval from the date of submission of the originator’s registration dossier until five years after the first MA is granted. Furthermore, in accordance with the new regulations, the regulatory authority must publicly disclose information on subsequent applications five months before the granting of MA, providing originator companies with an opportunity to exercise and enforce their intellectual property rights. Simplified Requirements for Foreign Legal Documents Circular 32 expands the circumstances under which legal documents issued by foreign authorities are exempt from consular legalization and authenticity verification requirements. Specifically, such documents may be exempt if the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) is able to verify their authenticity directly through official electronic means, including written confirmation or email correspondence sent directly to the MOH by the competent foreign authority, or publicly accessible English-language databases maintained by recognized foreign regulatory authorities. In addition, the new circular permits the submission of electronic notarized copies of legal documents
Read More
July 24, 2026
As food innovation continues to accelerate, manufacturers are increasingly introducing ingredients derived from new sources, produced using novel technologies, or lacking a significant history of human consumption. While these innovations create new opportunities for the food industry, they also raise important questions regarding consumer safety. For this reason, many jurisdictions, including Thailand, the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, Canada, and Singapore, require a premarket safety assessment for novel food ingredients before they can be placed on the market. The objective of this assessment is to ensure that each ingredient is safe for its intended use and level of consumption, does not present toxicological, allergenic, microbiological, or nutritional concerns, and will not mislead consumers. Scientific authorities typically evaluate the ingredient’s identity, manufacturing process, composition, specifications, anticipated dietary exposure, toxicological information, nutritional impact, and history of use before determining whether it can be marketed. Against this background, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently took an important step toward improving regulatory transparency by publishing, for the first time, a consolidated public list of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process, including substances determined to be novel foods and those determined not to fall within the novel food category. The list identifies the approved substances, the corresponding manufacturers or importers, approval dates, and the approved conditions of use. Although the publication does not change the existing legal framework governing novel food approvals, it provides businesses with greater visibility into the Thai FDA’s regulatory precedents and the types of substances that have previously been accepted through the safety assessment process. The full announcement is available on the Thai FDA’s website. As the list is now publicly available, it also provides useful insight into the types of substances that have successfully completed the Thai FDA’s safety assessment process.
Read More
July 24, 2026
For businesses in Thailand’s regulated industries, the problem of “too many licenses” is one of the most familiar hurdles to getting a product to market. Take a simple example: importing the materials necessary to sell teriyaki chicken skewers. To legally do this, a business may need approvals from several different agencies—separate permits for the chicken (Department of Livestock Development), the dipping sauce (Thai FDA), the wooden skewers (Department of Forestry), and other ingredients, each under a different authority. This kind of overlap is often cited to argue for a “regulatory guillotine”—a systematic review to cut outdated or duplicative rules that slow investment and business activity. The Facilitation of Licensing and Public Service Consideration Act B.E. 2569 (2026) (Licensing Facilitation Act 2026) is Thailand’s most significant response yet to that concern. This article looks at the Facilitation Act 2026 through a life sciences and regulatory affairs lens—what it may mean for the manufacturers, importers, and distributors of food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics, and similar products who routinely deal with several regulators to bring a single product to market. The Super License: One Approval Standing in for Many The reform with the clearest potential for regulated-product businesses is the law’s “super license” mechanism, referred to as a “main license” in the statute. Once a business obtains the main license for a regulated activity, it is automatically deemed to hold all related sublicenses issued by other agencies for that same activity, provided the activity has been designated as eligible in the Government Gazette. The Licensing Facilitation Act 2026 also creates a central application center, allowing applicants to submit a single application and pay all relevant fees at one point of contact, with the center routing the application to each agency through a shared information system. The potential benefits of this for businesses
Read More