You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 3, 2013

Creditors’ Rights over the Life Insurance of Debtors

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

A person’s debts do not come to an end just because he or she has died. After the debtor has passed away, the creditor is entitled to seek repayment of the debt from the debtor’s estate. Some debtors have life insurance under which the insurer will pay compensation to the beneficiaries stated in the policy, the debtor’s heirs where no beneficiaries are specified in the policy and, in certain cases, the debtor’s creditors.

Under the Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand, creditors are entitled to be repaid from insurance benefits in three specific circumstances, as detailed below.

Unspecified Beneficiary

In the first circumstance, the debtor’s life insurance policy states only that the insurance compensation shall be paid to the debtor’s heirs, but the debtor as the assured does not specify the beneficiary’s name. This life insurance policy is valid.

When the debtor dies, the insurer is obliged to pay the compensation to the heirs. Section 897 of the Civil and Commercial Code states that the insurance compensation is then considered part of the estate assets of the assured, and the creditor of the assured is therefore entitled to enforce the repayment from the insurance compensation.

Specified Beneficiary

Under the second circumstance, the debtor’s life insurance policy specifies the name of one or more beneficiaries, who may or may not be the debtor’s heirs. When the debtor dies, the beneficiary or beneficiaries will receive the insurance compensation as stated in the policy.

However, the second paragraph of Section 897 stipulates that if the insurance has been made in favor of a particular person, only the amount of the premiums paid by the assured shall be part of the assets of the estate available for the creditors. As a result, the creditor may enforce repayment of a debt only for that part of the benefits corresponding to the total premiums paid by the assured during his or her lifetime and cannot claim against any additional compensation paid to the beneficiary.

For example, Mr. Somchai purchases a life insurance policy with an insured amount of THB 500,000 and specifies in the policy that Ms. Onjira is to be his sole beneficiary. Mr. Somchai pays the first premium in the amount of THB 20,000 and then passes away. The insurer will then pay the total benefits of THB 500,000 to Ms. Onjira. Ms. Onjira will then have to transfer THB 20,000 baht, equal to Mr. Somchai’s insurance premium, to Mr. Somchai’s estate. Mr. Somchai’s creditors cannot claim for the insurance compensation at a total of THB 500,000, but they can claim against the THB 20,000 insurance premium, which becomes part of Mr. Somchai’s estate assets.

Debtor as Beneficiary

In the third scenario, a creditor may ask the debtor (while still alive) to specify the creditor as the beneficiary in the debtor’s life insurance policy. This is another solution allowing the creditor to secure repayment of a debt. Under this scenario, there are related legal provisions under the Civil and Commercial Code.

According to Section 1742 of the code, the creditor, as the beneficiary under the debtor’s life insurance policy, can claim for the total insurance benefits. Unlike other beneficiaries, the creditor is not required to return the insurance compensation equal to the total amount of paid insurance premium to the estate of the debtor.

In some cases, however, a debtor may have several creditors, and the other creditors may wish to demand that the creditor named as the beneficiary return the paid premium to the debtor’s estate. In making such a demand, the other creditors are required to prove two facts:

  • First, they must show that when specifying a creditor as the beneficiary, the debtor was aware such action would disadvantage the other creditors. Per Section 237 of the code, other creditors may request that the court revoke this juristic act.
  • Second, the creditors must prove the premiums paid were out of proportion to the income or station in life of the deceased or the debtor. For example, if the assured earned THB 20,000 per month but paid an insurance premium of THB 13,000 per month, this would be considered out of proportion to the income. This has to be considered on a case-by-case basis by assessing the living and economic conditions of the assured.

If the other creditors can prove both facts, the creditor named as beneficiary is required to return a proportion of the insurance benefits equal to the paid insurance premium to the debtor’s estate. If the two facts cannot be proved, the creditor as the beneficiary is not required to return any insurance compensation to the estate and remains entitled to full amount.

In any of these situations, a creditor who wishes to enforce repayment of a debt from a debtor’s estate must pursue the claim within one year from the date the creditor knew or ought to have known of the debtor’s death.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 30, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins’ insurance specialists in Bangkok provided Thomson Reuters’ latest country update on Thailand’s regulatory framework for the insurance industry. The country update, which is part of Thomson Reuters’ extensive Regulatory Intelligence offerings, contains information and guidance for insurers active in the Thai market. The guide covers the following topics in detail: Permission to operate; Legal and regulatory considerations for domestic and international insurers; Capital reserve requirements; Investment management and markets; The Office of Insurance Commission’s arbitration system for handling complaints; Creditor hierarchy; Rehabilitation of non-life insurance companies; and Personal data protection requirements for insurers. Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence is a service that provides with curated news, analysis, and data across jurisdictions to help legal, risk, and compliance professionals manage compliance and mitigate global risk. The full Thailand insurance country update is available by subscription to Regulatory Intelligence on the Thomson Reuters website.
June 30, 2026
Insurance specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins have provided an update to the Vietnam chapter of Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law guide to insurance and reinsurance. The guide is a Q&A-style overview of insurance and reinsurance law in jurisdictions worldwide. The Vietnam chapter provides a detailed overview of the legal framework for the insurance and reinsurance market in the country, covering the following issues: Regulatory framework for insurance and reinsurance Authorization for insurers, reinsurers, and insurance intermediaries Ownership restrictions Ongoing requirements Penalties for noncompliance Sales and marketing of insurance and reinsurance Transfer of risk Reinsurance contracts and risks Contracts and policies Claims Dispute resolution Insolvency Tax Practical Law, a legal reference resource from Thomson Reuters, publishes a range of guides for hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The insurance and reinsurance guide is a valuable resource for legal practitioners, covering numerous jurisdictions worldwide. To view the latest version of the guide, please visit the Practical Law website and enroll in the free Practical Law trial to gain full access.
June 5, 2026
Thailand’s Office of Insurance Commission (OIC) has opened a public hearing on proposed amendments to the OIC Notification on Criteria for Information Technology Risk Governance and Management for Life Insurance and Non-Life Insurance Companies B.E. 2563 (2020) via the centralized Law platform. The public consultation period runs from May 8, 2026, to June 9, 2026. The proposed amendments aim to elevate the IT risk governance and cybersecurity risk management framework to be more modern and aligned with international standards, with a focus on strengthening cyber resilience, enhancing the role of IT audits, and establishing data governance and data quality controls. The parties affected by these amendments include life insurance companies, non-life insurance companies, and external IT auditors. Key Changes Elevated Role of Board of Directors The proposed notification requires the company’s board of directors to oversee data governance, cybersecurity, and the responsible use of AI. Additionally, the board should include at least one director with IT knowledge or experience. Companies are also required to designate a head of security responsible for information security. The board’s duties are expanded to include oversight of data governance and AI usage, including establishing relevant policies and committees. Enhanced IT Security and Cybersecurity The revised notification consolidates the existing chapters on IT project management, IT security and cybersecurity to reduce redundancy, and introduces significant new measures. These include mandatory multi-factor authentication for material systems, enhanced data security measures such as data masking and data leakage prevention, security hardening requirements, web filtering, and mandatory vulnerability assessment and penetration testing at least annually. New requirements are also introduced for mobile application security, API security, and security measures for emerging technologies such as cloud computing and post quantum cryptography. The cybersecurity framework now encompasses identification, protection, detection, response, and recovery. The draft also introduces source code review
April 9, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has published two parallel sets of draft regulatory amendments for public hearing—one governing non-life insurance and the other governing life insurance. The proposed amendments would significantly revise the rules for issuing, offering, and selling insurance policies, as well as the conduct of agents, brokers, and banks. Stakeholders may submit comments until April 25, 2026. The key proposed changes are summarized below. Electronic Policy Delivery by Default Under both draft amendments, electronic delivery would become the default method for delivering insurance policies. A printed copy would be required only if the policyholder expressly opts out, and any such printed copy would be treated as a substitute for the electronic original. For life insurance, this requirement would also extend to coverage summaries and to exclusion documents. The OIC would also retain authority to approve alternative delivery methods for specific types of policies. Misuse of Licenses Both amendments would introduce an explicit prohibition against sales representatives using another person’s name or license, or allowing another person to use their name or license, in connection with the offering of insurance or in sales documentation and policies. Premium Collection Reforms Both amendments would introduce the premium collection reforms outlined below. Premium receipt accounts Insurers must ensure that sales representatives inform customers of the available payment channels, which are limited to channels that remit premiums into the insurer’s account. If a customer pays an insurance premium to an insurer’s employee, an insurance broker, or any other person, and the company acknowledges the payment by issuing an insurance policy or other documentary evidence of insurance coverage, the insurer would be deemed to have received the insurance premium. Written premium collection and refund guidelines Insurers would be required to prepare written internal guidelines covering premium collection and refund policies, risk