You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 22, 2025

Vietnam’s Draft Amended Land Law Introduces Notable Reforms

Subscribe to Updates

On August 12, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Agriculture and Environment submitted a draft law amending several provisions of the Land Law 2024 (“Draft Amended Land Law” or “Draft”) for government consultation and public comment. The Draft primarily aims to address three controversial issues in Vietnam’s land regime concerning (i) land pricing, (ii) land clearance, and (iii) the allocation of land outside auctions, following policy set out by Resolution 18-NQ/TW and the newly adopted Resolution 69-NQ/TW on land governance modernization. Land pricing is potentially one of the most important areas among the proposed reforms.

The Draft, however, has notably not addressed a major concern recently raised by the public: When a project has been allocated or leased land, but the relevant authority has not yet issued the land-price decision, a “supplemental charge” continues to accrue for the entire waiting period. Under current rules, this charge is calculated at 5.4% per year on the ultimately determined land-use fee or land rent, materially shifting project economics and pricing risks to developers or end-buyers.

Core Reforms on Land Pricing

The Draft Amended Land Law sets out a number of reforms on land pricing, including the following:

  • Land price tables: The Draft maintains provincial land price tables but clarifies the scope of application: They are used to determine land-related financial obligations of land users and compensation when the state recovers land; the government will detail the adjustment coefficient regime, ratios for land-use fee calculation by land type/user/form, and deductible infrastructure costs. Provincial people’s committees will continue to issue land price tables every five years, effective from January 1 of the first year in the cycle, with authority to supplement within the cycle as necessary. In provinces with cadastral maps and digital land price databases, the tables may be established down to the land-parcel level, aiming to enhance accuracy and market alignment.
  • Annual adjustment coefficient: To enhance responsiveness, the Draft requires provincial people’s committees to promulgate a land price adjustment coefficient annually, effective from January 1 of each year. The committees may also adjust the coefficient within the year or apply it differently for specific areas when required. The Draft aligns cases where coefficients apply with those for the land price tables.
  • Valuation inputs and deductions: Valuation inputs used for preparing land price tables and adjustment coefficients must be based on market data formed within 24 months prior to the approval of the land price table or coefficient project. The Draft also allows deduction of infrastructure construction costs when calculating land use fees or rents, aiming to reduce distortions and more accurately reflect project economics.
  • Appraisal councils: The Draft establishes provincial appraisal councils for land price tables and adjustment coefficients, chaired by the chairperson or a vice chairperson of the provincial people’s committee; the head of the provincial finance authority is vice chair; members include heads of relevant provincial departments and the chairs of commune-level people’s committees where relevant. Councils may set up working groups and hire valuation organizations to advise on appraisals.
  • High-Consensus Mechanism (“75% Rule”): Two options are under consideration for projects assembling land by private agreement where negotiations stall, with the drafting agency proposing the selection of Option 2:
    • Option 1: If either more than 75% by land area, or more than 75% of affected land users by headcount, have agreed, the state may acquire the balance and allocate/lease it to the investor.
    • Option 2: If either more than 75% by land area, or more than 75% of affected land users by headcount, have agreed, and those agreeing account for more than 50% of the project land area, the state may acquire the balance and allocate/lease it to the investor.

Other Notable Reforms

  • Choice of rent-payment modality (transitional clarity): The Draft permits flexibility for projects leasing land to choose between one-off upfront rent or annual rent, with safeguards for public entities managing land used for public interests to lease land with the annual-rent option only. This safeguard aims to prevent leakage of the state’s land budget.
  • Issuance of Land Use Rights Certificates (“LURCs”): The Draft streamlines procedures by allowing simultaneous LURC issuance when the underlying state decision (e.g., conversion or extension) is made, reducing processing time. It also clarifies who has the authority to issue LURCs: in most cases, provincial land-administration offices will handle the process, while commune-level chairs can issue certificates in straightforward cases or in cases serving the public interest.
  • Commercial housing projects: The Draft removes the restriction under Article 127.1(b) of the Land Law 2024, which had confined developers to negotiating only for residential land when conducting site assembly for commercial housing projects. This amendment permits negotiations for other land types in line with planning and subject to land-use conversion procedures where required. Nevertheless, related provisions in Articles 127.3(b) and 127.6 remain unchanged, still referring to “residential land” as the eligible category, which may result in internal inconsistencies and practical uncertainty during implementation.
  • Commune-level planning: Two options are presented; Option 1 replaces district-level planning with commune-level planning and introduces five-year commune plans; Option 2 abolishes commune-level land-use planning altogether (retaining commune five-year plans). The drafting body has expressed a preference for Option 2, aiming to simplify planning layers.
  • Expanded cases of state land recovery: The Draft adds several socio‑economic development cases (e.g., urban renewal; mixed‑use/urban/tourism/service projects; logistics; free‑trade/commercial‑finance centers; “cultural industry” projects) where land may be recovered for the public interest, aiming to unlock stalled large‑scale projects. This sits alongside the 75% mechanism as a complementary path.
  • Early land revocation in special situations: By default, revocation of land follows approval of compensation/resettlement plans. However, for urgent public projects or where the majority has agreed (or on‑site resettlement is feasible), the Draft permits revocation before full completion of such compensation/resettlement plans, while requiring local policies on temporary accommodation.

Opportunities for Investors and Developers

If implemented as drafted, the reforms would be able to improve project timelines and overall predictability for financiers and investors. The availability of five-year tables of land prices, which can possibly be detailed to land-parcel level in provinces with digitalized cadastral systems, would provide better clarity for real estate valuation in Vietnam. The requirement for an annual adjustment factor, operative from January 1 each year and with intra-year revision, is intended to better align the state’s land prices with true market movements, reducing the disparity which traditionally makes the viability of land pricing in Vietnam problematic for many new investors.

In the housing real estate sector, removal of the “residential-only” negotiation constraint enables developers to assemble sites from a wider variety of land types, converting where required and within the law, thereby lessening structuring frictions that previously caused projects to be held up. The proposed “75%” mechanism for preemptive land recovery in high-pressure or high-consensus scenarios could also shake loose the site assembly logjams, shortening timelines on major projects. Finally, more open delegation of LURC-granting authority and more accommodating rent-payment terms (one-time or recurring) should streamline administrative procedures and improve financing possibilities, particularly where more predictable land-fee timetables are important to underwriting.

Challenges for Investors and Developers

Even with these reforms, there is one significant shortfall; The Draft does not address the regime under which projects that have been awarded or leased land, but are still pending a land-price determination, fall under a 5.4% per annum of overdue charges based on the ultimate fee payable for utilizing the land or rent. This overcharge, having built up over decades of administrative delay, remains one of the most important hot topics for both current and near-term transactions.

Moreover, the Draft retains broad provincial discretion over annual adjustment coefficients with the potential to further exacerbate interprovincial divergence in pricing. The functioning of appraisal councils, coupled with the application of market data for the past 24 months, will play a crucial role in informing valuation outcomes, but these tools may struggle to quickly accommodate evolving market conditions. Further, while new land-revocation techniques can accelerate project implementation, they raise risks of execution in compensation and resettlement sequencing and involve proper management of stakeholders.

Finally, transitional projects that lie between the 2024 regime and the new regime will require meticulous refinancing of financing covenants, price-adjustment terms, and land-fee accrual assumptions to cut legal and financial risks down to their barest minimum.

Outlook

The Draft Amended Land Law is scheduled to be submitted to the National Assembly for consideration in late 2025, with a proposed effective date of January 1, 2026. Investors and developers need to stay tuned on how the Draft is finalized in some essential areas. One such area is the scope of cases where land price tables and annual coefficients are to be used. Another is how the annual coefficient should be computed and to what extent its disclosure is transparent. The ultimate form of the “75%” land assembly mechanism also warrants close scrutiny since it may have a material impact on project timetables. The government’s procedures for LURC issuance and planning reform direction will determine whether or not administrative processes are simplified or compounded. Finally, transitional rules will affect current projects, which will need to make provisions for how they move from the current structure to the new regime. Overall, these factors will shape compliance requirements and investment outcome certainty in Vietnam’s land market in the future.

Related Professionals

Practices

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 27, 2026
On August 25, 2026, Thailand’s Ministry of Interior issued an urgent circular letter (No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 19097) to all provincial governors, introducing enhanced enforcement guidelines for the investigation and prosecution of suspected nominee landownership by foreign nationals. The circular letter builds upon a prior circular letter issued on April 19, 2023 (No. MorTor 0515.2/Wor 7665), which first established the framework for provincial-level investigation committees and interagency cooperation on this issue. Under Thailand’s Land Code, foreign nationals are generally prohibited from owning land. To circumvent this restriction, some foreign nationals have historically used Thai nominees, whether individuals or Thai-registered juristic persons, to hold land on their behalf. Various government enforcement measures have been progressively strengthened in recent years. The new circular letter introduces three key measures: Expanded investigation committees. Provincial authorities must add representatives from specialized investigative agencies (such as local police superintendents) to the existing Fact-Finding and Investigation Committees, giving them broader access to shareholding data, tax records, immigration information, financial records, and evidentiary materials. Proactive screening of juristic persons. Provincial Land Offices are now required to actively screen and flag juristic persons (companies, partnerships, etc.) that show risk indicators of acting as nominees for foreign land ownership. The screening results must be referred to the investigation committees, which will determine whether the entity qualifies as a “foreign national” under the Land Code or was set up to circumvent the law. Two-track enforcement actions. Based on the committee’s findings, enforcement may consist of one or both of the following: Land disposal: If a juristic person is classified as a foreign national under the law, the provincial governor sets a deadline for the entity to dispose of the land under the Land Code. Criminal prosecution: If the entity was established specifically to hold land on behalf of a foreign national in circumvention
Read More
August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More
August 11, 2026
Cambodia’s Ministry of Justice has launched a new platform on its official website to publish notices of forced sales issued by each municipal and provincial court of first instance. The platform’s stated purpose is to inform the public and facilitate greater participation in forced-sale auctions conducted in connection with court-ordered enforcement proceedings. How the Platform Works The platform publishes forced-sale notices from courts of first instance across Cambodia’s municipalities and provinces and includes a link where the public can view properties currently subject to forced sale. To participate in a forced-sale auction, individuals can download Khmer-language bidding application forms through links provided on the platform. The form typically requires the applicant’s name, sex, year of birth, identity card number and issue date, and address, together with details identifying the immovable property (including its ownership certificate number), the relevant enforcement case number and date, and the reference to the public auction or tender announcement issued by the court. Completed application forms must be submitted directly to the specific municipal or provincial court that issued the forced sale. For further inquiries about a particular forced sale, interested parties should likewise contact the relevant municipal or provincial court. Forced Sale of Immovable Property in Cambodia The publication of these notices relates to the forced sale procedure for immovable property under Cambodia’s Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). Unlike property seizure by a court, a forced sale is a compulsory execution proceeding—a subsequent enforcement step that arises only after an underlying dispute has been adjudicated and a debtor fails to pay the debt or outstanding amount due under a final and binding judgment or other enforceable title of execution. For the purposes of this procedure, the term “immovable property” under the CPC refers to land, registered buildings, jointly held shares of such property, registered
Read More
July 3, 2026
Thailand will keep its reduced government fees for property sale and mortgage registration in place for another year. Two Ministry of Interior notifications, issued following a cabinet resolution on June 30, 2026, and published in the Government Gazette on July 1, 2026, extend the previously reduced fee levels through June 30, 2027. The reduced registration fees apply to the sale and mortgage of the same property types covered in prior versions of the scheme: detached houses, semidetached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, land transferred together with such buildings, and condominium units. To be eligible for the reduced fees, the purchase price, the officially assessed value, and the mortgage amount must each not exceed THB 7 million, and the buyer must be a Thai individual. The reduced registration fees for eligible sales and mortgages are calculated as follows: Sale: 0.01% of the official assessed value (reduced from standard rate of 2%) Mortgage: 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from standard rate of 1%) The reduced mortgage registration fee applies only if the mortgage is registered at the same time as the sale of the property.
Read More