You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 8, 2025

New Draft Regulatory Framework for Food Product Declaration and Registration in Vietnam

Subscribe to Updates

In response to persistent challenges in food safety management and recent high-profile incidents involving counterfeit supplemented foods, infant formula, and health supplements, the Ministry of Health of Vietnam is initiating comprehensive regulatory reforms. These reforms include proposed amendments to the Law on Food Safety and its implementing Decree No. 15/2018/ND-CP (Decree 15), introducing significant changes to the registration procedures for food products, especially supplemented food products and health supplements.

While awaiting public consultation and approval of the amended Law on Food Safety, the Ministry of Health is developing an interim mechanism, which includes a draft decree to replace Decree 15 and a draft resolution to address urgent issues until the amended law becomes effective, expected in July 2026.

To align with the new Law on Quality of Products and Goods, the draft resolution stipulates that the declaration and registration of food products will follow the following procedures:

  • Declaration of applied standards for food products, which is currently known as the “self-declaration” procedure, applies to processed packaged foods, food additives, food processing aids, containers or utensils that come into direct contact with food, packaging materials in direct contact with food, and micronutrients.
  • Granting of circulation numbers, which is the current “registration of product declaration” procedure, applies to specific categories of food including health supplements, medical nutrition foods, special dietary foods, nutritional products for children up to 36 months, and, especially, supplemented foods, which are currently subject to self-declaration but will be shifted to this registration procedure.

In addition, the following new procedure is introduced in the draft decree:

  • Registration of declaration of conformity, which applies to the same product category as in “declaration of applied standards” above, but is for products that are already subject to technical regulations covering both safety indicators and quality indicators.

Changes to the Food Product Declaration and Registration Procedures

Details of the procedures for declaration of applied standards and granting of circulation numbers are stipulated in the draft resolution, while details of the procedure for registration of declaration of conformity are stipulated in the draft decree. These procedures will see some key changes compared to the current regulations, as highlighted below:

  • Letter of authorization: A letter of authorization (LOA) from the manufacturer or product owner to the entity conducting the declaration of applied standard or registration is a new requirement applicable to both procedures. Information that must be included in the LOA is detailed in the draft resolution.
  • Quality criteria: It is newly required to test quality criteria in a Certificate of Analysis (COA), in addition to safety criteria, for both procedures. The COA will need to follow the format set out in the draft resolution.
  • Declaration of conformity with internal standards: In addition to the declaration of compliance with food safety requirements, both product declaration and registration procedures have a new requirement that the declaring or registering entity must confirm that the product complies with its internal standards. This conformity is substantiated by submitting the in-house specification along with a dossier detailing the development of the specification.
  • Timeline for declaration of applied standards: The draft resolution introduces a defined principal evaluation timeline of 21 days from the date of submission—an element not specified under current regulations. It also clarifies that entities may begin manufacturing and trading declared products once the declaration, including the entity name and product name, is published on the authority’s official website.
  • Required documents: The required documents applicable to products subject to the registration of product declaration procedure are much more stringent than in current practice. The registration dossier will cover two parts: (i) administrative and (ii) technical. More technical documents will be required for the technical part, such as a manufacturer’s certificate (GMP, HACCP, etc.), report on product research and development process, documentation on quality and safety standards, documentation of manufacturing process, long-term stability report, and other technical explanation (if necessary).
  • Timeline for registration of product declaration: The estimated principal approval timeline is specifically set as 90 days from the date of submission. Compared to the current regulation, the timeline for submitting a supplemental dossier will be reduced from 90 working days to 60 working days from the date of receiving an official notice of deficiency. Notably, instead of an unlimited number of revisions, the draft resolution only permits a one-time revision.
  • Exclusion of certain products from the registration of product declaration procedure: Certain food additives—including blended food additives with new functions, those not on the Ministry of Health’s permitted list, or those used for incorrect purposes—are no longer subject to the registration of product declaration procedure under the draft resolution. Neither the draft resolution nor the draft decree specify how these products should be registered, suggesting that future regulations on food additive management may address this gap.

Suspension of Product Declaration Registration

The draft resolution introduces a new provision allowing competent authorities to temporarily suspend the receipt and processing of product declaration dossiers from entities who have violated food safety regulations. Processing will resume once the violations are fully remedied and a compliance report is submitted.

Transitional Provision

Under the draft decree, for food products that are registered or self-declared before the effective date of the decree, product owners must complete the procedures for re-registering or re-declaring product standards in accordance with the draft resolution (after it is enacted), within the following timeframes:

  • 18 months from the effective date of the decree for products that already have a Certificate of Receipt for Product Declaration.
  • 6 months from the effective date of the decree for products that are self-declared.

After these deadlines, any previous product declaration documents or certificates will no longer be valid for production or importation. However, products with a certificate that were produced within 18 months of the decree’s effective date and products that were self-declared and produced within 6 months of the decree’s effective date may continue to be circulated until their expiration date, and the product owner remains fully responsible for those products.

The draft decree does not specify a transitional period for the supplemented food products that will be shifted from the self-declaration procedure to the registration of product declaration procedure.

The draft resolution and draft decree will be discussed and approved under the fast-track procedure. However, no expected effective date has been provided. It remains possible that further revisions to the draft decree may be introduced.

Impact for Businesses and Next Steps

Businesses will be required to prepare additional documentation for declaration and registration processes to comply with the new regulations once they are enacted. Stricter documentation will be required for products subject to registration of declaration procedure, especially for supplemented foods, which are shifted from self-declaration procedure to registration of product declaration procedure.

Businesses should review their product portfolios to determine applicable registration pathways, develop plans to update the declaration and registration dossiers, and monitor for further amendment, official issuance, and implementation guidance.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Practices

Regulatory Affairs

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 9, 2026
On August 5, 2026, the Consumer Case Division of Thailand’s Civil Court rendered a judgment in a case involving a beauty clinic that advertised acne scar treatments using claims that the clinic was operated by a specialist physician and that the treatment, allegedly involving stem cell technology, could permanently remove acne scars. The plaintiff brought a claim against both the physician-owner and the clinic company, alleging that the advertisements were false and induced her to purchase the treatment. The court found that the clinic was liable for the false representations and that the physician-owner, as both the authorized director of the company and the medical practitioner who provided treatment, was jointly responsible. Although the plaintiff could not fully prove all damages claimed, the court awarded compensation of THB 20,000, together with interest. While the judgment arose from a consumer protection dispute, it serves as a valuable reminder that medical facility advertisements in Thailand are regulated and may expose clinics and healthcare providers not only to regulatory enforcement but also to civil liability from patients who rely on misleading promotional claims. Regulatory Framework Governing Medical Facility Advertisements Medical facility advertising in Thailand is governed by the Medical Facility Act B.E. 2541 (1998), as amended by the Medical Facility Act (No. 4) B.E. 2559 (2016). The principal secondary legislation is the Department of Health Service Support (DoHSS) Notification Re: Rules, Procedures, Conditions, and Fees for an Advertisement or Publication Concerning a Medical Facility, which came into force on November 25, 2019. Under this notification, “advertising” includes any act, by any means, that causes members of the public to see, hear, or otherwise become aware of a message, sound, or image for the commercial benefit of a medical facility. This broad definition covers not only traditional media but also clinic websites, social
Read More
September 9, 2026
On June 30, 2026, Indonesia’s National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) issued BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 on Food Packaging, which expands the list of approved food-contact substances and recognizes a broader range of permissible functions for those substances. The new regulation, which revokes BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, reflects developments in packaging technology and materials science. Although the new regulation provides more advantages to business actors by adding more food contact substances to the approved list for use in food packaging, there are more stringent rules and restrictions for testing. One of the most significant changes is a comprehensive migration-testing framework that sets out requirements for packaging materials, testing conditions, food simulants, and specific migration limits. Overall and Specific Migration Under BPOM Regulation No. 20 of 2019, migration requirements were primarily set out within the lists of approved food-contact substances and packaging materials. BPOM Regulation No. 11 of 2026 instead expressly requires packaging materials that come into direct contact with food to meet both overall and specific migration limits. These are defined as follows: Overall migration: The total quantity of all substances that migrate from the packaging, regardless of whether the substances are hazardous or nonhazardous to health. Specific migration: The quantity of a particular identified substance known to be hazardous to health that migrates from the packaging. Stricter Limits on Heavy Metals The overall migration limit for plastic packaging remains unchanged under both regulations at 60 mg/kg or 10 mg/dm². However, the new regulation introduces significant changes to the regulation of heavy metals. Under the 2019 regulation, four heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium VI, and mercury—were subject to a single combined limit of 1 mg/kg. The 2026 regulation, however, requires each heavy metal to meet its own individual specific migration limit, adds arsenic as
Read More
September 7, 2026
Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) has reinstated a key provision limiting pharmaceutical patent protection, signaling a renewed commitment to balancing patent rights with public access to medicines. In its ruling to Case No. 255/PUU-XXIII/2025, the court partially granted a petition for judicial review of Law No. 65 of 2024, which had amended the country’s Patent Law, and ordered the restoration of a provision that had excluded certain pharmaceutical inventions from patentability. The decision took effect immediately upon its pronouncement at the court’s plenary session on August 28, 2026. Background The petition challenged the removal of article 4(f) from Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents (Patent Law), as amended by Law No. 65 of 2024. Article 4(f) had excluded from patentability certain inventions relating to new uses of known substances. The petitioners argued that removing this provision would open the door to patent protection for second medical use inventions and facilitate patent evergreening—practices that can extend exclusivity periods, delay generic market entry, and reduce public access to affordable medicines. The petitioners included several patient advocacy and public-interest organizations: the Indonesian Dialysis Patients Community Association, the Indonesian Association of Drug Abuse Victims (PKNI), the Indonesian Pulmonary Hypertension Foundation (YHPI), the Rekat Peduli Indonesia Foundation, and the Indonesian Positive Women’s Association (IPPI), along with the Indonesia for Global Justice Association and four individual petitioners. The petitioners also challenged the constitutionality of the phrase “interested party” in article 70(1) of the Patent Law, arguing that it should be construed expressly to clarify who has standing to appeal a decision to grant a patent before the Board of Patent Appeal, and to allow a broader range of parties—such as patent holders, licensees, consumer organizations, prosecutors, aggrieved third parties, and others who may suffer direct or indirect harm from the grant of a patent—to
Read More
September 4, 2026
Blind boxes and collectibles have become increasingly popular, driven by the excitement of not knowing which character or design will be revealed until the package is opened. While most visible in the art toy market, the same concept is also used in the food industry. Confectionery, snacks, and other food products are sometimes sold with toys, character figures, cards, or other collectibles. A package might, for example, contain one of ten possible characters, with consumers knowing that an item is included but not which one they will receive. Some collections may also feature rare or “secret” items. For food businesses, however, adding a randomized toy or collectible involves more than a marketing decision. The food, the nonfood item, and the randomized mechanism may each raise different regulatory considerations in Thailand. Thai FDA Requirements for Nonfood Objects Packaged with Food The main food regulatory consideration is Ministry of Public Health Notification No. 310 B.E. 2551 (2008), which regulates food packaged together with things or objects that are not food. Under Notification No. 310, certain nonfood objects may be packaged together with food where they fall within specified exceptions, including objects that serve the following purposes: Maintaining the quality or standard of the food, such as a desiccant or oxygen absorber; Serving as a seasoning or as part of food preparation, such as chili powder sachets or seasoning sachets contained in instant noodle packages; or Functioning as an eating or food-preparation utensil, such as a spoon or fork included with instant noodles. Other nonfood objects that do not fall within these categories generally should not be placed inside the food container together with the food. Where a toy, collectible, or other nonfood object is intended to be sold together with a food product, businesses should therefore carefully consider the nature of
Read More